RESUMO
BACKGROUND: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of patients on a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant and prioritize sicker people in anticipation of a heart graft. We aimed to assess the impact of patient age in the new allocation policy on mortality following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the effect of age ≥70 on post-transplant events, including stroke, dialysis, pacemaker, and rejection requiring treatment. METHODS: The UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent heart transplants alone in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups according to their age (over 70 and under 70 years old). RESULTS: Patients aged over 70 were more likely to require dialysis during follow-up, but less likely to experience rejection requiring treatment, compared with patients aged <70. Age ≥70 in the new allocation system was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.05-1.91; p = .024), but its effect on 5-year mortality was not significant after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted HR: 1.27; 95% CI:.97-1.66; p = .077). Undergoing transplantation under the new allocation policy vs the old allocation policy was not a significant predictor of mortality in patients over 70 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Age ≥70 is a significant predictor of 1-year mortality following heart transplantation, but not at 5 and 10 years; however, the new allocation does not seem to have changed the outcomes for this group of patients.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Marca-Passo Artificial , Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sistema de Registros , Diálise RenalRESUMO
Diabetes-associated atherosclerosis involves excessive immune cell recruitment and plaque formation. However, the mechanisms remain poorly understood. Transcriptomic analysis of the aortic intima in Ldlr-/- mice on a high-fat, high-sucrose-containing (HFSC) diet identifies a macrophage-enriched nuclear long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), MERRICAL (macrophage-enriched lncRNA regulates inflammation, chemotaxis, and atherosclerosis). MERRICAL expression increases by 249% in intimal lesions during progression. lncRNA-mRNA pair genomic mapping reveals that MERRICAL positively correlates with the chemokines Ccl3 and Ccl4. MERRICAL-deficient macrophages exhibit lower Ccl3 and Ccl4 expression, chemotaxis, and inflammatory responses. Mechanistically, MERRICAL guides the WDR5-MLL1 complex to activate CCL3 and CCL4 transcription via H3K4me3 modification. MERRICAL deficiency in HFSC diet-fed Ldlr-/- mice reduces lesion formation by 74% in the aortic sinus and 86% in the descending aorta by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the aortic wall and pro-inflammatory responses. These findings unveil a regulatory mechanism whereby a macrophage-enriched lncRNA potently inhibits chemotactic responses, alleviating lesion progression in diabetes.
Assuntos
Doenças da Aorta , Aterosclerose , Diabetes Mellitus , Placa Aterosclerótica , RNA Longo não Codificante , Animais , Camundongos , RNA Longo não Codificante/genética , RNA Longo não Codificante/metabolismo , Quimiotaxia , Doenças da Aorta/genética , Doenças da Aorta/metabolismo , Doenças da Aorta/patologia , Aterosclerose/metabolismo , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Camundongos Knockout , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Receptores de LDL , Placa Aterosclerótica/metabolismoRESUMO
(1) Background: Heart failure is an extremely impactful health issue from both a social and quality-of-life point of view and the rate of patients with this condition is destined to rise in the next few years. Transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment for end-stage heart failure, but a shortage of organs represents a significant problem that prolongs time spent on the waiting list. In view of this, the selection of donor and recipient must be extremely meticulous, considering all factors that could predispose to organ failure. One of the main considerations regarding heart transplants is the risk of graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression therapy to mitigate that risk. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics of patients who need immunosuppression treatment for rejection within one year of heart transplantation and its impact on mid-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried to identify patients who solely underwent a heart transplant in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for anti-rejection treatment within one year of heart transplantation. Patients' characteristics in the two groups were assessed, and 1 year and 10 year mortality rates were compared. (3) Results: A total of 43,763 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation in the study period, and 9946 (22.7%) needed anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Patients who required treatment for rejection within one year after transplant were more frequently younger (49 ± 14 vs. 52 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), women (31% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and had a higher CPRA value (14 ± 26 vs. 11 ± 23, p < 0.001). Also, the rate of prior cardiac surgery was more than double in this group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), while prior LVAD (12% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and IABP (10% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients who did not receive anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Finally, pre-transplantation creatinine was significantly higher in patients who did not need treatment for rejection in the first year (1.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.01). Most patients who did not require anti-rejection treatment underwent heart transplantation during the new allocation era, while less than half of the patients who required treatment underwent transplantation after the new allocation policy implementation (65% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Patients who needed rejection treatment in the first year had a higher risk of unadjusted 1 year (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.88-2.70; p < 0.001), 5 year (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.60-1.79; p < 0.001), and 10 year (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41-1.54, p < 0.001) mortality, and this was confirmed at the adjusted analysis at all three time-points. (4) Conclusions: Medical treatment of acute rejection was associated with significantly increased 1 year mortality compared to patients who did not require anti-rejection therapy. The higher risk of mortality was confirmed at a 10 year follow-up. Further studies and newer follow-up data are required to investigate the role of anti-rejection therapy in the heart transplant population.