Significantly smaller lateral extrusion was observed within 24 weeks after all-inside suture repairs of radial tear in the middle segment of lateral meniscus compared to inside-out repairs.

Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative meniscal extrusion between all-inside suture (AIS) and trans-capsular suture (TCS) repair techniques. Methods: Thirteen patients (mean age, 19.4 years) underwent AIS repairs using only sutures (AIS group) for radial tears in the middle segment of the lateral meniscus (RTMLM), and seven patients (mean age, 20.3 years) underwent inside-out repairs among TCS (TCS group). For all cases, lateral (LE), anterior (AE) and posterior (PE) meniscal extrusions of the lateral meniscus were measured during preoperative and 3-, 12- and 24-week postoperative MRIs. Then, the change of each extrusion from preoperative to each postoperative period was calculated as ∆LE, ∆AE and ∆PE. Results: There was no significant difference between the AIS and TCS groups in the preoperative extrusions. As for postoperative extrusions, only ∆LEs in the AIS group was significantly smaller than those in the TCS group at all postoperative periods (-1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mm at 3-week, -0.9 ± 0.9 vs. 0.4 ± 0.9 mm at 12-week and -0.3 ± 1.0 vs. 0.6 ± 1.1 mm at 24-week postoperation). In ∆AEs and ∆PEs, at all three postoperative periods, there were no significant differences. Conclusion: Postoperative LE, AE and PE on MRIs after AIS and TCS repairs for RTMLM were investigated. Significantly smaller lateral extrusion was observed within 24 weeks after AIS repairs of RTMLM compared to TCS repairs, which could lead to stabilization of the repair site and prevent degenerative changes. Level of Evidence: Case-control study, retrospective comparative study, Level Ⅲ.

All-inside suture meniscal repair using suture passer.

In recent years, to save the meniscus and prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis, the indications for meniscus repair have been expanding instead of partial menisectomy. Accordingly, various repair techniques for meniscus tears have been developed. The conventional inside-out and outside-in meniscus repair techniques and all-inside repair technique with an implant/anchor can be classified as trans-capsular (TC) repair from the perspective of suture with penetrating capsule. Recently, new suture passers for all-inside meniscus repair have been developed. To distinguish from conventional all-inside repair with implant/anchors, all-inside repair with only suture using these suture passers was described as all-inside suture (AIS) repair. This AIS repair could achieve meniscus-to-meniscus suture across the tear without interposition of soft tissues including the capsule between suture and meniscus, leading direct gap closing of torn edges. In this respect, AIS repair is considered to be "anatomical meniscus repair". Actually, some reports showed biomechanical and clinical advantages of AIS repair. However, there is still limited evidence in clinical practice. Moreover, there are some disadvantages for AIS repair. Not only further studies but also development of new devices and surgical techniques for AIS should be required. This review describes the current status of AIS repair for each type of tear.

Goal Orientation and Desire for Approval Were Associated With Sports Injuries Among Young Japanese Athletes.

Introduction: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between psychological factors (goal orientation and desire for approval from others) and the severity of sports injuries experienced by young Japanese athletes. Methods: A total of 560 young Japanese athletes (328 males and 232 females) aged 18-24 years completed an online survey in 2022-2023. A web questionnaire was used to investigate participants' task and ego orientations, desire for approval from others (e.g., coaches and friends/families), and history of injury. The samples were then split into 3 groups on the basis of the rest duration due to the injury: noninjury group (0 days), mild-to-moderate injury group (1-27 days), and severe injury group (>28 days). Spearman's test examined a correlation between task and ego orientation scores among all samples. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the scores between the severe injury and noninjury groups. Result: A significant positive correlation was found between task and ego orientation scores from all samples (ρ=0.27, p<0.001). The severe injury group had significantly higher task orientation scores and desire for approval scores than the noninjury group (ρ=0.001, p<0.001). Conclusions: Japanese young athletes with high task orientation and approval desire may be at risk of severe sports injuries requiring >4 weeks to return to sports. The goal orientation profiles should be interpreted with caution. Future research should examine contextual effects such as the perceived motivational climate, in addition to the goal orientation profiles.

Clinical outcomes after repair of an isolated radial tear in the middle segment of the lateral meniscus - All-inside suture repair vs trans-capsular suture repair.

Background/objective: For radial tears, all-inside suture (AIS) repair was clearly biomechanically superior, compared to conventional trans-capsular suture (TCS) repairs. However, clinical comparative studies of these two repairs techniques have not to be performed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes after AIS repair and TCS repairs for isolated radial tear at middle segment of lateral meniscus (RTMLM) in stable knees of young athletes. Methods: Twenty-six athletes (mean age, 19.1 years) underwent AIS repair with the double horizontal suture technique, using SutureLasso™ (Arthrex, Naples, FL) for isolated RTMLM (AIS group), and 20 athletes (mean age, 19.0 years) underwent inside-out repair, one of TCS repairs, with tie-grip suture technique (TCS group). All athletes were assessed for preoperative and two-year postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). At six-month after repair, the lateral meniscal extrusion on mid-coronal plane on MRI and healing status on second-look arthroscopy were also evaluated in all patients. Results: In both groups, KOOS improved to either good or excellent postoperatively, while complete healing was found in only 23 and 25% at second-look arthroscopy. We identified no group-dependent differences in KOOS or healing status on arthroscopy. However, a close examination of failure rates revealed significant lower rates in AIS group relative to that of TCS group (p = 0.048). Moreover, the change from preoperative to postoperative lateral meniscal extrusion in AIS group was significantly smaller than that in TCS group (p = 0.038). Conclusions: AIS and TCS repairs for RTMLM were comparable in providing satisfactory clinical results with low rates of complete healing on arthroscopy. However, AIS repair could have lower failure rate of healing on arthroscopy and minimize postoperative lateral meniscal extrusion more effectively than TCS repair on MRI.

Glenoid defect size increases but the bone fragment rarely resorbs in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability.

Background: With recurrent anterior instability the bone fragment of a bony Bankart lesion is often small compared to the glenoid defect. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the changes to both the bone fragment and glenoid defect over time in a single subject. Methods: Participants were patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) at least twice after an instability event between 2004 and 2021 and had a fragment-type glenoid at first CT. The glenoid rim width (A), glenoid defect width (B), and bone fragment width (C) were measured in millimeters. If B or C increased by 1 mm or more from the first to final CT, the change was judged as "enlarged," and if B or C decreased by 1 mm or more, it was judged as "reduced"; all other cases were judged as "similar." Then, glenoid defect size and bone fragment size were calculated as B/A×100% and C/A×100%, respectively, and the changes from the first to final CT were compared. Results: From the first to final CT, the glenoid defect was enlarged in 30 shoulders, similar in 13 shoulders, and reduced in 4 shoulders, and the bone fragment was enlarged in 18 shoulders, similar in 24 shoulders, and reduced in 5 shoulders. The mean glenoid defect size significantly increased from 10.9% to 15.3% (P < .001), and the mean bone fragment size increased from 6.4% to 7.8%, respectively (P = .005). At the final CT, in 6 shoulders a new glenoid fracture was observed at a different site from the original fracture. When they were excluded from the analyses, the mean glenoid defect size still significantly increased (from 11.2% to 15.2%; P < .001), but the mean bone fragment size did not (6.5% vs. 7.3%, respectively; P = .088). Conclusions: In shoulders with recurrent anterior instability, glenoid defect size appears to increase significantly over time, whereas the bone fragment size remains unchanged or increases only slightly. Bone fragment resorption is quite rare, and a bone fragment appears to be small because of an enlarged glenoid defect.

New bone formation after arthroscopic Bankart repair for unstable shoulders with an erosion-type glenoid defect.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate new bone formation after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the influence of new bone formation on recurrence in shoulders with an erosion-type glenoid defect. METHODS: We analyzed data on shoulders with an erosion-type glenoid defect. Participants were patients who underwent computed tomography to evaluate new bone formation after ABR performed from 2004 to 2021 and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. We investigated the factors influencing new bone formation, in particular the presence of an intraoperative bone fragment, and the influence of new bone formation and its size on postoperative recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 100 shoulders were included. The mean glenoid defect size was 10.1% ± 6.3% (range, 1.2%-31.5%). New bone formed postoperatively in 15 shoulders (15.0%) and was seen in significantly more shoulders with an intraoperative bone fragment (11 of 18, 61.1%) than in those without a fragment (4 of 82, 4.9%; P < .001). Recurrence occurred in 22 shoulders (22.0%), and the rate of recurrence was not different between shoulders with new bone formation (3 of 15, 20.0%) and without new bone formation (19 of 85, 22.4%; P = .999). Among the 15 shoulders with new bone formation, the size of the new bone fragments relative to glenoid width was <5% in 2 shoulders, 5%-<7.5% in 8 shoulders, 7.5%-<10% in 3 shoulders, and ≥10% in 2 shoulders; in all 3 shoulders with postoperative recurrence, the relative size was <7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Even in shoulders with an erosion-type glenoid defect, new bone may form after ABR, especially in shoulders with an intraoperative bone fragment. However, new bone formation does not decrease the rate of postoperative recurrence.

Rectangular bone-patellar tendon bone grafts reduce early graft failure in chronic ACL-Deficient knees.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess early graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction according to chronicity of ACL deficiency (ACLD) and clarify predisposing factors. METHODS: A total of 731 patients who underwent anatomic ACL reconstruction were divided into 3 groups based on chronicity of ACLD: <6 months (Group 1), 6 months to 2 years (Group 2), and >2 years (Group 3). Types of ACL grafts used included single-bundle hamstring tendon (HT), multiple-bundle HT, and rectangular bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts. Preoperatively and immediately postoperatively, lateral radiographs in full extension were taken to examine anterior tibial subluxation (ATS). All ACL grafts were evaluated by MRI at 6 months to identify graft failure. The group with the highest failure rate was further examined to compare possible risk factors between the intact and failure subgroups, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predisposing factors. RESULTS: Early graft failure on MRI without any episode of postoperative trauma was observed in 7 (1.4%), 2 (1.8%), and 11 (9.2%) patients in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with a significantly higher rate in Group 3 (P < 0.001). Of the 119 patients in Group 3, significant differences were observed between intact and failure subgroups with regard to surgical procedure (P = 0.03), chondral lesions (P < 0.01), and preoperative ATS (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that surgical procedures (odds ratio, 3.8; 95%CI, 1.16-12.59) and preoperative ATS (odd ratio, 2.4; 95%CI, 1.26-4.38) were predisposing factors of early graft failure. CONCLUSION: Patients with ACLD for >2 years experienced early graft failure with an incidence rate of 9.2%. Predisposing factors of early graft failure in these patients included the use of single-bundle HT grafts and preoperative ATS. The use of rectangular BTB grafts resulted in a lower graft failure rate. STUDY DESIGN: Case Series.

Knot location in arthroscopic inside-out meniscal repair: Cadaveric evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The inside-out repair technique is the gold standard for treatment of meniscal tears, while some soft tissues can be hung as the sutures are tied outside the capsule. The purpose was to clarify the association between the suture site and knot location in the arthroscopic inside-out technique. METHODS: Inside-out meniscal suture was arthroscopically performed on medial and lateral menisci in twenty-three cadaveric knees, on the assumption that longitudinal tear existed. A retractor was inserted above the semi-membranous tendon and anterior to the gastrocnemius for the medial side, while the retractor was placed in the anterior space of the gastrocnemius for the lateral side. After identifying three segments (anterior, middle and posterior segments), eight sutures were inserted into the following eight areas in each knee: anterior (M1, L1) and posterior (M2, L2) areas of the middle segment, and anterior (M3, L3) and posterior (M4, L4) areas of the posterior segment. Twelve knees underwent meniscal repair on femoral side and eleven passed sutures on the tibial side, while knots were tied outside of the joint. Attentive dissection was performed to assess the relation between knot locations and the principal structures around the knee joint. RESULTS: In medial meniscal suture, most sutures for the middle portion (M1, 2) bound medial collateral ligament (MCL), while a few cases included the semi-membranous tendon for the M4 area. In lateral meniscal suture, sutures for the L1 area tied some fibers of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) in high frequency, while popliteal muscles/tendons were tied over at the L3 area. CONCLUSIONS: Most suture knots were located on MCL or capsule in medial meniscus suture, while more than half sutures passed through LCL or popliteal tendon/muscle in lateral meniscus suture. An assistant should retract LCL under direct observation and the surgeon must confirm the direction of needle for lateral meniscal repair.

Unrecognized glenoid fracture in opposite shoulders with symptomatic anterior instability.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of unrecognized glenoid fracture in opposite shoulders with symptomatic anterior instability. METHODS: Participants were 38 patients, who had complaints of instability on only one side (symptomatic shoulder) and had no complaints despite of a glenoid fracture on the other shoulder (asymptomatic shoulder) from 2011 to 2020. Factors that could influence the onset of symptoms including glenoid rim morphology were retrospectively investigated. RESULTS: Among the asymptomatic shoulders, 16 had a single traumatic event and 22 had no history of trauma. The glenoid morphology was normal in 6, erosion in 12 and bony Bankart in 20 on the symptomatic side, whereas the respective shoulders were 0, 16 and 22 on the asymptomatic side. Bone union of bony Bankart was complete in 9, partial in 3 and non-union in 8 on the symptomatic side, whereas the respective shoulders were 18, 3 and 1 on the asymptomatic side. The mean glenoid defect size was 10.4% and 7.8%, and the mean bone fragment size was 5.0% and 4.5%, respectively. The mean medial displacement of bone fragments was 2.6 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). A larger glenoid defect (≥10%) was recognized in 19 symptomatic shoulders and 10 asymptomatic shoulders. Among them, erosion was solely recognized in 5 symptomatic shoulders. In shoulders with bony Bankart, all 10 asymptomatic shoulders had a completely or partially united fragment with less than 2 mm displacement. On the other hand, among 14 symptomatic shoulders, united fragment was solely recognized in 8 shoulders, in which medial displacement was less than 2 mm in 3 shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: Even if a glenoid fracture occurred, symptom such as instability or pain was not always recognized by all patients. Regardless of glenoid defect size, shoulders with a completely or partially united bone fragment and with less than 2 mm displacement were found to be asymptomatic.

The process of bone union after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in younger athletes with a subcritical glenoid defect: An advantage of remained large bone fragment.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the bone union process after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair (ABBR) in shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect of 13.5% or larger. METHODS: Bone union process after ABBR performed from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively investigated in 47 athletes younger than 30 years with a subcritical glenoid defect, who underwent CT at least twice postoperatively. The change of bone union between first CT within 6 months and final CT later than 6 months was investigated, especially noticing bone fragment size (≥7.5% versus <7.5%). RESULTS: The mean period at first CT and at final CT was 4.1 ± 0.6 months (3-6 months) and 16.8 ± 11.6 months (7-71 months), respectively. From the first to final CT, among 15 shoulders with a small bone fragment (<7.5%), complete union increased from 4 shoulders (26.7%) to 8 shoulders (53.3%), while among 32 shoulders with a large bone fragment (≥7.5%), complete union increased from 15 shoulders (46.9%) to 25 shoulders (78.1%). On the other hand, while non-union or disappeared bone fragment was recognized in 8 shoulders (53.3%) with a small fragment and in 2 shoulders (6.3%) with a large fragment at first CT, it was solely recognized in 4 shoulders (26.7%) with a small fragment and in no shoulders with a large fragment at final CT. While postoperative glenoid fracture at the site of bone union was recognized in 7 shoulders, complete union was finally obtained after conservative treatment in 5 shoulders. So, final complete union was obtained in 9 (60%) of 15 shoulders with a small fragment and in 29 (90.6%) of 32 shoulders with a large fragment (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect, when a large bone fragment (≥7.5%) was repaired, complete union rate was higher and complete union could be obtained earlier.

Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques.

Purpose: Tensioning technique at graft fixation is one of key factors for successful outcomes in ACL reconstruction. The tensioning boot, which had two tensioners and was fixed to the tibia with a bandage, was developed for precise graft tensioning. The purpose was to compare the anterior knee laxity between the manual tensioning and the tensioning boot techniques immediately after ACL reconstruction under anesthesia in order to elucidate the effectiveness of using the tensioning boot. Methods: 33 patients had anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon graft. After grafts were fixed with EndoButton-CL on lateral femoral cortex, grafts were tied to Double Spike Plate (DSP). Each graft was pre-tensioning with 20 N (totally 40 N) at 20 degree of flexion for 3 minutes using manually-held tensioner in 11 patients and using tensioner installed to tensioning boot in the remaining 22 patients before graft fixation, and were then fixed in the same manner. Tibial displacement under 67 and 89 N of tibial anterior load was measured by KT-2000 Knee Arthrometer under anesthesia before and immediately after operation. Results: The anterior knee laxity in the operated knee was 4.5 ± 1.0 mm in the manual tensioning group and 2.9 ± 0.9 mm in the tensioning boot group at 89 N of anterior load, showing a significant difference. (P < .0001) The side-to-side difference in the manual tensioning group was significantly less than that in the tensioning boot group. (P = .002). Conclusions: Anterior laxity of the operated knees as well as KT side-to-side difference immediately after ACL reconstruction was larger in the tensioning boot technique than the manual tensioning technique, when the graft was fixed in the same manner. Thus, the initial tension at graft fixation with the tensioning boot can be smaller than 40 N.

Remaining Large Bone Fragment of a Bony Bankart Lesion in Shoulders With a Subcritical Glenoid Defect: Association With Recurrent Anterior Instability.

BACKGROUND: A preoperative glenoid defect of 13.5% or larger is recognized as a subcritical glenoid defect at arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for collision/contact athletes or military personnel. PURPOSE: To clarify the prevalence and size of remaining bone fragments in shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect at recurrent anterior instability and to investigate the influence on postoperative recurrence after ABR for younger competitive athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The study included 96 shoulders with recurrent instability that underwent ABR between July 2011 and March 2018 for shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the glenoid defect size (13.5%-<20%, medium; ≥20%, large). The bone fragment size in each defect group was retrospectively investigated and classified into 4 groups (no, 0%; small, >0%-<5%; medium, 5%-<10%; large, ≥10%). The postoperative recurrence rate for each combination of glenoid defect size and bone fragment size was investigated for competitive athletes aged <30 years. The fragments, when present, were repaired to the glenoid. RESULTS: The glenoid defect size was 13.5%-<20% in 60 shoulders (medium defect group) and ≥20% in 36 shoulders (large defect group). The mean bone fragment size was 6.7% ± 5.1% and 8.9% ± 4.9%, respectively (P = .042). In the medium defect group, there were 15 shoulders (25%) without a bone fragment, 6 shoulders (10%) with a small fragment, 23 shoulders (38.3%) with a medium fragment, and 16 shoulders (26.7%) with a large fragment. In the large defect group, the respective numbers were 2 shoulders (5.6%), 6 shoulders (16.7%), 14 shoulders (38.9%), and 14 shoulders (38.9%). A medium or large bone fragment was more common in the large defect group (P = .252). Among 64 younger competitive athletes who underwent ABR with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, postoperative recurrence was recognized in 7 of 38 (18.4%) athletes in the medium defect group, but it was not recognized in any of the 26 athletes in the large defect group (P = .036). Postoperative recurrence was recognized in 4 of 12 (33.3%) athletes with a small fragment or no fragment and in 3 of 52 (5.8%) athletes with a medium or large fragment (P = .019). CONCLUSION: A larger bone fragment frequently remained in shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect at recurrent instability. The postoperative recurrence rate after ABR for younger competitive athletes was low when a remaining larger bone fragment was repaired.

Anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides excellent clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes following anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft using an adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device with enough patients and a high follow-up rate. METHODS: This study included 125 patients who underwent anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. A BTB TightRope® was used for femoral graft fixation. Clinical evaluations were performed more than 2 years after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form. Patients interviewed by telephone were only subjectively evaluated. The side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at a manual maximum force was measured using the KT-2000 Arthrometer®. RESULTS: Among the 125 patients, 99 were ultimately included and 26 were lost to follow-up (follow-up rate: 79%). Eight patients had re-tear (re-tear rate: 8%) and six patients had ACL injuries to the contralateral knee. Three patients did not follow our rehabilitation programme. One patient suffered septic arthritis. These 18 patients were considered ineligible for clinical evaluations. Therefore, clinical evaluations were performed in 81 of the 99 patients (64 were available for direct follow-up and 17 were available for a telephone interview). The follow-up period was 30 ± 10 months (range 24-68 months). According to the IKDC subjective assessment, 48 (59%) and 33 (41%) knees were graded as normal and nearly normal, respectively. A loss of extension (3°-5°) was observed in five patients (8%), whereas one patient (2%) exhibited a loss of flexion (3°-5°). The Lachman test was negative in 63 patients (98%). The pivot shift test was negative in 59 patients (92%). The side-to-side difference in KT value was 0.4 ± 0.7 mm (range - 1-4 mm). CONCLUSION: Anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft using an adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device provided excellent clinical outcomes both subjectively and objectively more than 2 years after surgery, whereas 8 of the 99 patients had re-tear of the graft. The adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device could be safely used in anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The lateral meniscal extrusion after repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years.

BACKGROUND: A meniscal repair is often performed on radial/flap or longitudinal tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it is unknown if meniscal extrusion changes over time after repair. This study evaluated whether meniscal extrusion of the LM is maintained after repair or progresses with time using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Among 574 patients who underwent primary anatomic ACLR, 123 patients followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Forty patients with concomitant radial/flap tears of the LM (group R), 43 with longitudinal LM tears (group L), and 40 with intact LM (group C, matched-control group) were included. Clinical findings (pain, range of motion, swelling, and anterior laxity), lateral joint space on radiograph, and meniscal extrusion on MRI were assessed. Lateral/posterior meniscal extrusions were examined preoperatively, within 3 weeks after surgery, and at the final follow-up, and the absolute values and relative values (the preoperative values as baseline) were assessed respectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical and roentgenographic findings among the groups. No difference was observed in the relative values within 3 weeks after surgery among three groups, although the absolute values were larger in the repaired groups than in group C. At the final follow-up, however, the lateral extrusion in group L had progressed significantly, compared with that in group C (P = 0.033), while no significant difference was detected in the lateral extrusion between groups R and C (P = 0.177). The posterior extrusion in groups R and L had progressed significantly compared with that in group C (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LM extrusion could not be improved even immediately after meniscal repair, and it progressed laterally and posteriorly for more than 2 years after surgery.

A Glenoid Defect of 13.5% or Larger Is Not Always Critical in Male Competitive Rugby and American Football Players Undergoing Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair: Contribution of Resultant Large Bone Fragment.

PURPOSE: To investigate bone union and postoperative recurrence after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair (ABBR) in male competitive rugby and American football players with a subcritical glenoid defect of ≥13.5% and to compare findings with those in players with a glenoid defect of <13.5%. METHODS: Participants were male competitive rugby or American football players with a glenoid defect and bone fragment who underwent ABBR from July 2011 to December 2018 and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. We investigated the influence of glenoid defect and bone fragment size on bone union and postoperative recurrence after ABBR. RESULTS: We included 45 rugby players and 35 American football players. A total of 38 shoulders were assigned to the small defect group (<13.5%) and 42 to the large defect group (≥13.5%). The complete bone union rate was 47.4% in the small defect group and 71.4% in the large defect group (P = .040), and postoperative recurrence was seen in 13 (34.2%) and 5 shoulders (11.9%), respectively (P = .030). In the small defect group, the bone fragment size was <7.5% in 30 shoulders and ≥7.5% in 8 shoulders; in comparison, the respective numbers were 12 and 30 shoulders in the large defect group, and large fragments (>7.5%) were significantly more common in this group (P < .001). The complete union rate was significantly higher in shoulders with a large fragment (≥7.5%) than in those with a small fragment (<7.5%; 78.9% versus 42.9%, respectively; P = .001). The recurrence rate was 33.3% in shoulders with a small fragment (<7.5%) and 10.5% in shoulders with a large fragment (≥7.5%; P = .017) and was significantly lower in shoulders with a complete union than in those without a complete union (6.3% versus 46.9%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The postoperative recurrence rate after ABBR was lower in male competitive rugby and American football players with a large glenoid defect (≥13.5%) than in those with a small glenoid defect (<13.5%) and might be associated with a higher rate of complete bone union of the resultant large bone fragment (≥7.5%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

On-the-Edge Anchor Placement May Be Protective Against Glenoid Rim Erosion After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared to On-the-Face Anchor Placement.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to compare the effects of 2 different anchoring placements on glenoid rim erosion after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). METHODS: Shoulders that underwent ABR from January 2013 to July 2020 were divided into 2 groups according to anchor placement (on-the-face, group F; on-the-edge, group E). We retrospectively calculated the percent change of glenoid width (Δ) on the first postoperative computed tomography scan (CT; performed within 6 months) and second postoperative CT (performed at 6 to 12 months) relative to the width on the preoperative CT and compared percent changes between the 2 groups. Also, we investigated the influence of preoperative glenoid structures (normal, erosion, bony Bankart) and the postoperative recurrence rate. RESULTS: We examined 225 shoulders in 214 patients (group F, n = 151; group E, n = 74). At first CT, anchoring placement was significantly associated with postoperative decrease of glenoid width (group F, -7.6% ± 7.9%; group E, -0.1% ± 9.7%; P < .0001). The difference between groups F and E was significant in shoulders with a preoperative glenoid defect (bony Bankart, -6.6% ± 8.8% vs 2.5% ± 11.2%, respectively; P < .0001; erosion, -6.6% ± 6.2% vs -2.6% ± 5.3%, respectively; P = .03). In 112 shoulders, CT was performed twice; Δ was -6.9% ± 7.3% in group F (n = 64) and -1.7% ± 10.1% in group E (n = 48; P = .005) at the first CT and -3.2% ± 10.0% and 1.0% ± 10.6% (P = .10), respectively, at the second CT, indicating recovery of glenoid width in both groups. The postoperative recurrence rate in patients with at least 2 years' follow-up was 14.7% in group F and 14.6% in group E. CONCLUSIONS: In the early stage after ABR, on-the-edge glenoid anchor placement was associated with less glenoid rim erosion than on-the-face anchor placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Isolated peripheral longitudinal tears in the anterior-middle segment of medial meniscus among young soccer players: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: There was little information about the isolated medial meniscal tears in the anterior-middle segment. This study aimed to report the infrequent cases of the isolated medial meniscal tears in the anterior-middle segment related to kicking motion among young soccer players with a short-term postoperative outcome. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In the retrospective review of the surgical records from 2000 to 2018, there were 15 cases with the corresponding tear. They were all young male soccer players with a mean age of 16.7 years (range: 10-23 years). The cause of injury was kicking motion during playing soccer in all the patients. The most frequent symptom was locking in 80% of the cases. In the arthroscopic evaluation, all the cases presented with a longitudinal (bucket-handle) tear in the anterior-middle segment in the peripheral zone with a length of 25 to 30 mm, while the posterior segment and the cruciate ligaments were intact. Meniscal repair was performed for all the cases. At one year, all the patients could return to play soccer with a pre-injury level without any symptoms. In the second-look arthroscopy at six months among four cases, all meniscal tears healed completely. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of isolated peripheral longitudinal tear in the anterior-middle segment of the medial meniscus, which is related to the kicking motion among young soccer players and mainly causes locking.

Bipolar Bone Defects in Shoulders With Primary Instability: Dislocation Versus Subluxation.

BACKGROUND: In shoulders with traumatic anterior instability, a bipolar bone defect has been recognized as an important indicator of the prognosis. PURPOSE: To investigate bipolar bone defects at primary instability and compare the difference between dislocation and subluxation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: There were 156 shoulders (156 patients) including 91 shoulders with dislocation and 65 shoulders with subluxation. Glenoid defects and Hill-Sachs lesions were classified into 5 size categories on 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans and were allocated scores ranging from 0 (no defect) to 4 points (very large defect). To assess the combined size of the glenoid defect and Hill-Sachs lesion, the scores for both lesions were summed (range, 0-8 points). Patients in the dislocation and subluxation groups were compared regarding the prevalence of a glenoid defect, a bone fragment of bony Bankart lesion, a Hill-Sachs lesion, a bipolar bone defect, and an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion. Then, the combined size of the bipolar bone defects was compared between the dislocation and subluxation groups and among patients stratified by age at the time of CT scanning (<20, 20-29, and ≥30 years). RESULTS: Hill-Sachs lesions were observed more frequently in the dislocation group (75.8%) compared with the subluxation group (27.7%; P < .001), whereas the prevalence of glenoid defects was not significantly different between groups (36.3% vs 29.2%, respectively; P = .393). The combined defect size was significantly larger in the dislocation versus subluxation group (mean ± SD combined defect score, 2.1 ± 1.6 vs 0.8 ± 0.9 points, respectively; P < .001) due to a larger Hill-Sachs lesion at dislocation than subluxation (glenoid defect score, 0.5 ± 0.9 vs 0.3 ± 0.6 points [P = .112]; Hill-Sachs lesion score, 1.6 ± 1.2 vs 0.4 ± 0.7 points [P < .001]). Combined defect size was larger in older patients than younger patients in the setting of dislocation (combined defect score, <20 years, 1.6 ± 1.2 points; 20-29 years, 1.9 ± 1.5 points; ≥30 years, 3.4 ± 1.6 points; P < .001) but was not different in the setting of subluxation (0.8 ± 1.0, 0.7 ± 0.9, and 0.8 ± 0.8 points, respectively; P = .885). An off-track Hill-Sachs lesion was observed in 2 older patients with dislocation but was not observed in shoulders with subluxation. CONCLUSION: The bipolar bone defect was significantly more frequent, and the combined size was greater in shoulders with primary dislocation and in older patients (≥30 years).

Anatomical Triple Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Hamstring Tendon Autografts: Tunnel Locations and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To anatomically clarify the location of the tunnel apertures created using the bony landmark strategy and to elucidate clinical outcomes after anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with unilateral ACL injury who had consented to undergo computed tomography (CT) at 3 weeks, as well as 2-year follow-up evaluation, were enrolled. At the time of surgery, remnant tissues were thoroughly cleared to create 2 femoral and 3 tibial tunnels inside the ACL attachment areas bordered by the bony landmarks. Two double-looped semitendinosus tendon autografts were prepared and fixed on the femur with two EndoButton-CLs and secured to the tibia with pullout sutures and plates with 10-20N of tension. The location of the tunnel aperture areas was assessed using 3-dimensional CT images, and 2-year postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The CT evaluation showed 100% of the femoral tunnel aperture area and at least 79% of the tibial tunnel aperture area were located inside the anatomic attachment areas. Thirty patients were available for clinical evaluation. The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective assessment showed all of the patients were classified as "normal" or "nearly normal." Lachman and pivot-shift tests were negative in 100% and 93%, respectively. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior laxity at the maximum manual force with a KT-1000 Knee Arthrometer was 0.7 ± 0.7 mm, ranging from 0 to 2 mm. CONCLUSION: In ATB ACL reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts, the tunnels can be created in proper locations using the arthroscopically-identifiable bony landmarks. Moreover, ATB ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon grafts via the proper tunnels result in consistently satisfactory clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Biological Augmentation of ACL Repair and Reconstruction: Current Status and Future Perspective.

Historically, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair mostly resulted in failure because of intra-articular hypovascularity and poor intrinsic healing capacity of ACL. ACL reconstruction was therefore deemed the gold standard with a high success rate because of more evolved surgical technique. There are, however, clinical and subclinical disadvantages of reconstruction; low rate in full recovery to sports, donor harvest morbidity, tunnel enlargement, and incomplete microscopic healing of the graft. Recent experimental and clinical studies on biological augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, or the other biologic agents with scaffold suggested potential feasibility of positive effects by such bio-therapies for both ACL repair and reconstruction. Biological augmentation of ACL surgery is still in the exploratory stages and more evidence from preclinical and clinical studies is required for implementation in clinical practice.