RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, pharyngeal anesthesia such as nebulizer or lidocaine pump spray is the risk of droplet transmission to health care workers from coughing due to spraying anesthesia. Absence of pharyngeal anesthesia may induce coughing and reduce patient and operator satisfaction, but the efficacy of pharyngeal anesthesia under sedation is still limited. Therefore we evaluated a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial to evaluate efficacy of pharyngeal anesthesia in patients receiving sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized comparison of pharyngeal anesthesia with or without bronchoalveolar lavage in patients undergoing bronchoscopy at our hospital between March and October 2022. Pharyngeal anesthesia was performed using 8ï¼ lidocaine spray and the operators were blinded to eliminate bias. Two hundred patients were entered into the study and divided into two groups: those who received pharyngeal anesthesia(control group) and did not receive pharyngeal anesthesia(test group). The primary endpoint was the operator's satisfaction with the procedure. The secondary endpoints were the patient's cough during the examination as perceived by the operator, cough and discomfort experienced by the patient and the dose of analgesic/sedative/lidocaine administered. These scales were scored from 0 to 100. RESULT: In primary endpoint, there was no significant difference in the operator-rated procedure satisfaction between the 2 groups. The median for the discomfort score for patients in the control group was tendency higher than in the test group. There were no significant differences in other secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Pharyngeal anesthesia may not be recommended for flexible bronchoscopy performed under combined sedation and analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: UMIN000046975Date of registration: 2022/03/07.
Assuntos
Lavagem Broncoalveolar , Broncoscopia , Tosse , Lidocaína , Faringe , Humanos , Broncoscopia/métodos , Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Tosse/etiologia , Método Simples-Cego , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Lavagem Broncoalveolar/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a diagnostic procedure with adequate performance; however, its ability to provide specimens of sufficient quality and quantity for treatment decision-making in advanced-stage lung cancer may be limited, primarily due to blood contamination. The use of a 0.96-mm miniforceps biopsy (MFB) permits true histological sampling, but the resulting small specimens are unsuitable for the intended applications. Therefore, we introduced a 1.9-mm standard-sized forceps biopsy (SFB) and compared its utility to that of MFB. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients from three institutions who presented with hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy and suspected advanced-stage lung cancer, or those who were already diagnosed but required additional tissue specimens for biomarker analysis. Each patient underwent MFB followed by SFB three or four times through the tract created by TBNA using a 22-gauge needle on the same lymph node (LN). Two pathologists assessed the quality and size of each specimen using a virtual slide system, and diagnostic performance was compared between the MFB and SFB groups. RESULTS: Among the 60 enrolled patients, 70.0% were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. The most frequently targeted sites were the lower paratracheal LNs, followed by the interlobar LNs. The diagnostic yields of TBNA, MFB and SFB were 91.7%, 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively. The sampling rate of high-quality specimens was significantly higher in the SFB group. Moreover, the mean specimen size for SFB was three times larger than for MFB. CONCLUSION: SFB is useful for obtaining sufficient qualitative and quantitative specimens.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Linfadenopatia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Broncoscopia/métodos , Mediastino/patologia , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfadenopatia/patologia , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
This case reports rare findings on computed tomography of a manifestation of malignant lymphoma, in which diffuse lung shadows appeared as miliary nodules distributed throughout the lungs bilaterally. The patient had a history of surgical treatment of rectal cancer and had received chemotherapy for suspicious liver metastasis. At her current presentation for evaluation suspected miliary tuberculosis on chest radiography, subsequent liver biopsy revealed a mass infiltration of atypical lymphocytes, which was diagnosed as follicular lymphoma. The miliary tuberculosis was suspected more than neoplastic lesions, such as metastatic rectal cancer or malignant lymphoma. Despite repeated bacteriologic tests of various samples, including sputum, urine, bronchial secretion, peripheral blood, bone marrow aspiration, and gastric lavage, all results were negative for mycobacterium tuberculosis. Finally, multiple, small, mass lesions of lymphocytes were demonstrated in the lung obtained from video-assisted thoracic surgery, and a diagnosis of follicular lymphoma was given. The final interpretations of liver mass and military lung lesions were tumor involvement by the follicular lymphoma. This radiologic findings of multiple miliary opacities throughout the whole lungs confused definite diagnosis because these images were remarkably similar with miliary tuberculous. This case reminds us to consider a wide variety of differential diagnoses even we assumed to be familiar with radiographic imaging at first glance.
RESUMO
We herein report the case of a 74-year-old woman with a lung tumor. She presented with complaints of blurred and rapid, progressively impaired vision. A visual field examination revealed bilateral concentric contraction of the visual field and a ring scotoma in the right eye. She was diagnosed with cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) combined with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung via a visual field examination and underwent thoracoscopic surgery. CAR has been mostly associated with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Combined LCNEC is relatively rare and accounts for 10.6% of all LCNECs. This is the first case report of CAR-combined LCNEC.