EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with antegrade stent placement in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a rescue procedure when ERCP fails. Peritonitis and recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) are adverse events (AEs) associated with EUS-HGS. Antegrade stent placement across a malignant distal biliary obstruction (DBO) followed by EUS-HGS (EUS-HGAS) creates 2 biliary drainage routes, potentially reducing peritonitis and prolonging time to RBO (TRBO). We compared the outcomes of the 2 techniques. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with malignant DBO who underwent attempted EUS-HGS or EUS-HGAS across 5 institutions from January 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A matched cohort of patients was obtained using 1-to-1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was TRBO, and secondary outcomes were AEs except for RBO and overall survival. RESULTS: Among 360 patients, 283 (176 and 107 in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively) were eligible. The matched cohorts included 81 patients in each group. AEs developed in 10 (12.3%) and 15 (18.5%) patients (P = .38) in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively. RBO occurred in 18 and 2 patients in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively (P < .001). TRBO was significantly longer in the HGAS group (median, 194 days vs 716 days; hazard ratio, .050; 95% confidence interval, .0066-.37; P < .01). However, no significant differences occurred in overall survival between the groups (median, 97 days vs 112 days; hazard ratio, .97; 95% confidence interval, .66-1.4; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HGAS extended TRBO compared with EUS-HGS, whereas AEs, except for RBO and overall survival, did not differ. The longer TRBO of EUS-HGAS could benefit patients with longer life expectancy.

Transluminal antegrade drill dilation technique for hepaticojejunostomy stricture with cholangioscopic evaluation (with video).

Background and study aims Balloon dilation and plastic stent deployment have been performed as hepaticojejunostomy stricture (HJS) treatment techniques under endoscopic ultrasound guidance (EUS). Although these techniques have shown favorable clinical results, the treatment period can be long because stent deployment is required. In addition, HJS may recur even after treatment because the scar tissue itself remains. To overcome these challenges, we developed an EUS-guided antegrade drill dilation technique for treating HJS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of this technique in terms of the pre- and post-cholangioscopic findings. Patients and methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients whose conditions were complicated with symptomatic HJS between November 2022 and February 2023. Transluminal antegrade drill dilation (TAD) using a novel drill dilator was attempted within 14 days after EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS). HJS was diagnosed with cholangioscopy before TAD, and resolution was evaluated after TAD using cholangioscopy. Results TAD was attempted at approximately 11 days after EUS-HGS. The cholangioscope was inserted successfully in all patients after this procedure. Cholangioscopy revealed stricture without evidence of malignancy in 19 patients. In the remaining three patients, stricture was not observed and these patients underwent stent exchange rather than TAD. Among the 19 patients, passage of the guidewire across the HJS into the intestine was unsuccessful in four patients, and the technical success rate for this procedure was 78.9%. TAD was successful in all 15 patients in whom passage of the guidewire was achieved. Conclusions In conclusion, TAD appears to be technically feasible and safe.

Evaluation of exclusive internal endoscopic drainage for complex biloma with transluminal and transpapillary stenting.

Background and study aims Biloma is treated endoscopically with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) or endoscopi ultrasound-guided transluminal biloma drainage (EUS-TBD). However, almost all previous studies have used both internal and external drainage. External drainage has the disadvantages of poor cosmetic appearance and self-tube removal. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the internal endoscopic drainage for complex biloma after hepatobiliary surgery with an ERCP- or EUS-guided approach, without external drainage. Patients and methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had bilomas. A 7F plastic stent was deployed from the biloma to the duodenum in the ERCP group and the metal stent was deployed from the biloma to the stomach in the EUS-TBD group. Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The technical success rate was similar between the groups (ERCP 94% vs EUS-TBD 100%, P =0.371); however, mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the EUS-TBD group (16.9 minutes) than in the ERCP group (26.6 minutes) ( P =0.009). The clinical success rate was 87% (25 of 32 patients) in the ERCP group and 84% (11 of 13 patients) in the EUS-TBD group ( P =0.482). The duration of median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-TBD group (22 days) than in the ERCP group (46 days) ( P =0.038). There was no significant difference in procedure-associated adverse events between the groups. Conclusions In conclusion, ERCP and EUS-TBD are complementary techniques, each with its own merits in specific clinical scenarios. If both techniques can be performed, EUS-TBD should be considered because of the short times for the procedure, hospital stay. and biloma resolution.

Propensity score matching analysis for clinical impact of braided-type versus laser-cut-type covered self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

BACKGROUND: To prevent stent migration during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), intra-scope channel release technique is important, but is unfamiliar to non-expert hands. The self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is an additional factor to prevent stent migration. However, no comparative studies of laser-cut-type and braided-type during EUS-HGS have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the distance between the intrahepatic bile duct and stomach wall after EUS-HGS among laser-cut-type and braided-type SEMS. METHODS: To evaluate stent anchoring function, we measured the distance between the hepatic parenchyma and stomach wall before EUS-HGS, one day after EUS-HGS, and 7 days after EUS-HGS. Also, propensity score matching was performed to create a propensity score for using laser-cut-type group and braided-type group. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 24 patients underwent EUS-HGS using a laser-cut-type SEMS, and 118 patients underwent EUS-HGS using a braided-type SEMS. EUS-HGS using the laser-cut-type SEMS was mainly performed by non-expert endoscopists (n = 21); EUS-HGS using braided-type SEMS was mainly performed by expert endoscopists (n = 98). The distance after 1 day was significantly shorter in the laser-cut-type group than that in the braided-type group [2.00 (1.70-3.75) vs. 6.90 (3.72-11.70) mm, P < 0.001]. In addition, this distance remained significantly shorter in the laser-cut-type group after 7 days. Although these results were similar after propensity score matching analysis, the distance between hepatic parenchyma and stomach after 7 days was increased by 4 mm compared with the distance after 1 day in the braided-type group. On the other hand, in the laser-cut-type group, the distance after 1 day and 7 days was almost the same. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HGS using a laser-cut-type SEMS may be safe to prevent stent migration, even in non-expert hands.

Moving scope technique improves technical success rate of device insertion during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video).

Background: Technical tips for device insertion during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) have not been reported. To improve the technical success rate of device insertion without unnecessary tract dilation, the pushing force should be transmitted directly from the channel of the echoendoscope to the intrahepatic bile duct. Objectives: We developed a novel technique, termed the 'moving scope technique', the feasibility of which during EUS-HGS is described. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: The primary outcome of this study was the technical success rate of dilation device insertion without electrocautery dilation after the moving scope technique. The initial technical success rate of dilation device insertion was defined as successful insertion into the biliary tract. If dilation device insertion failed, the moving scope technique was attempted. Results: A total of 143 patients were enrolled in this study. The initial technical success rate for device insertion was 80.4% (115/143). The moving scope technique was therefore attempted in 28 patients. The mean angle between the intrahepatic bile duct and the guidewire was improved to 141.0° and resulted in a technical success rate of 100% (28/28). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.88, and 120° predicted successful dilation device insertion with sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 78.8%. Bile peritonitis (n = 8) and cholangitis (n = 2) were observed as adverse events, but were not severe. Conclusion: In conclusion, the moving scope technique may be helpful during EUS-HGS to achieve successful insertion of the dilation device into the biliary tract. These results should be evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Liver impaction technique improves technical success rate of guidewire insertion during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video).

Background: If the guidewire becomes kinked by the needle, guidewire manipulation may be difficult, and can cause complications such as guidewire shearing or injury during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS). To overcome this matter, we have previously described a technical tip for preventing guidewire injury, termed 'liver impaction technique'. However, its technical feasibility has been not reported in the setting of a large patient cohort. Objectives: The aim of study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the liver impaction technique during EUS-HGS. Design: Retrospective, single-center study. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2018 and September 2022. The primary outcome of this study was the technical success rate of guidewire insertion using the liver impaction technique. Results: A total of 166 patients were enrolled in this study. Initial successful guidewire insertion without using liver impaction technique was obtained in 108 patients (65.1%). Among 58 patients in whom guidewire insertion failed initially, guidewire advancement into the periphery of the bile duct was observed in 32 patients (55.2%) and into a non-interest bile duct branch was observed in 26 patients (44.8%). Liver impaction technique contributed to increasing the technical success rate of guidewire insertion from 65.1% to 95.8%. Overall, adverse events were observed in 12 patients (7.2%; bile peritonitis n = 9, cholangitis n = 3), and these adverse events were Grade I. Among patients who underwent liver impaction technique (n = 58), adverse events were observed in two patients (3.4%; bile peritonitis). Also, guidewire sharing was not observed in any patients during liver impaction technique. Conclusions: In conclusion, the liver impaction technique may be helpful during EUS-HGS to obtain successful guidewire insertion into the biliary tract of interest.

Clinical evaluation of a novel drill dilator as the first-line tract dilation technique during EUS-guided biliary drainage by nonexpert hands (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In cases in which tract dilation fails using the initially selected dilation device during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), dilation should be re-attempted using another device. However, switching from one device to another during the procedure is often associated with prolonged procedure time and deviation from the correct axis. Therefore, it is highly desired that the initial tract dilation succeeds on the first attempt. Recently, a novel drill dilator has become available in Japan. Because there have been no previous studies comparing this novel device versus others as an initial dilation device, this article reports on the technical feasibility of this novel device for use during EUS-HGS and compares it with a balloon catheter. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent EUS-HGS using a self-expandable metal stent between October 2021 and October 2022. Excluded from the study were patients who underwent EUS-HGS using a plastic stent or stent deployment without tract dilation. The primary outcome in this study was the technical success rate of initial tract dilation using the drill dilator. This dilator has been available at our hospital since June 2022. Thus, EUS-HGS was performed using this device as the primary dilation device from June 2022 to October 2022. As the control group, we corrected patients who underwent EUS-HGS using a 4-mm balloon catheter as the primary dilation device from October 2021 to May 2022. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included: 19 underwent EUS-HGS using the drill dilator and 30 underwent EUS-HGS using a balloon catheter. EUS-HGS using the drill dilator initially was performed mainly by nonexpert hands (n = 19), whereas only some procedures in the balloon catheter group were performed by nonexpert hands (n = 2). Although the initial tract dilation was successful in all patients in the drill dilator group (19 of 19 [100%]) and in 29 (97%) of 30 in the balloon catheter group, additional tract dilation was needed in 73.7% (14 of 19) of the drill dilator group upon insertion of the 8.5F stent delivery system. In contrast, the stent delivery system insertion was successful without additional tract dilation in all patients in the balloon catheter group. CONCLUSIONS: The novel drill dilator might be useful as a dilation device; however, the balloon dilation technique should be selected first upon deploying a dedicated metal stent with an 8.5F stent delivery system.

Gastrojejunostomy versus endoscopic duodenal stent placement for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatments for patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) due to unresectable pancreatic cancers (URPC) include gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and endoscopic duodenal stent placement (EDSP). This study compared the efficacy and safety of GJJ and EDSP in patients with GOO due to URPC. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with GOO due to URPC who underwent GJJ or EDSP between April 2016 and March 2020. The efficacy and safety of GJJ and EDSP were compared with propensity score analysis. Subgroup analyses of overall survival (OS) were compared after propensity matching. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 54 patients who underwent GJJ and from 73 who underwent EDSP at five tertiary care hospitals. After propensity matching, OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent GJJ than EDSP (110 vs. 63 days, respectively; p = 0.019). Evaluation of long-term adverse events showed that the frequency of cholangitis and obstructive jaundice was significantly lower in the matched GJJ than in the matched EDSP group (p = 0.012). Subgroup analyses showed that OS in patients with good performance status (PS; p = 0.041), biliary obstruction (p = 0.007), and duodenal obstruction near the papilla (p = 0.027), and those receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.010), was significantly longer in the matched GJJ group than in matched EDSP group. CONCLUSION: GJJ provides longer OS than EDSP for patients with GOO caused by URPC, especially for patients with good PS, biliary obstruction, and duodenal obstruction near the papilla, and those receiving chemotherapy.

Prospective registration study of diagnostic yield and sample size in forceps biopsy using a novel device under digital cholangioscopy guidance with macroscopic on-site evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although the SpyGlass Direct Visualization System can be clinically useful for diagnosing indeterminate biliary stricture, it employs SpyBite forceps, which typically obtain only a small amount of tissue and have a low sampling rate. An improved forceps biopsy device for SpyGlass DS has recently been released (SpyBite MAX). The aim of this prospective registration study was to assess the diagnostic yield and efficacy of histological biopsy tissue obtained with SpyBite MAX forceps compared with SpyBite forceps in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture. METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy specimens obtained by SpyBite MAX forceps. The secondary outcomes were tissue size, number of forceps biopsies, rate of obtaining adequate tissue, and adverse events in the SpyBite MAX forceps group compared with the SpyBite group. RESULTS: Forceps biopsies using SpyBite MAX (n = 47) and SpyBite (n = 50) were performed successfully in all patients. The number of biopsies performed before visible core tissue was obtained was significantly lower in the SpyBite (mean, 1.5 ± 0.7) than in the SpyBite forceps group (mean, 2.3 ± 1.1 mm; P < .001). Tissue sample size was larger in the SpyBite MAX group (mean, 1.8 ± 1.6 mm2 ) than in the SpyBite group (mean, 1.0 ± 0.9 mm2 ; P = .004) but there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: Improvements in dedicated forceps for biopsy in SpyGlass DS may contribute to improving the rates of adequate tissue and tissue sample size obtained, and to reducing the number of forceps biopsies required.

Endoscopic bilateral revision after metal stent deployment for hepatic hilar obstruction using molting technique (with videos).

Background: After multiple uncovered self-expandable metal stent (UCSEMS) deployments, endoscopic revision becomes complex and potentially challenging. A novel stent delivery system with a dilation function has recently been developed in Japan. This study evaluated the technical feasibility of this device for patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO) after multiple UCSEMS deployments. Method: Participants comprised consecutive patients with unresectable MHO who had undergone multiple UCSEMS deployments and required endoscopic revision for the right or left hepatic bile ducts, as decided by cholangiography under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance. Results: A total of 14 patients requiring endoscopic revision of right and left hepatic bile ducts were enrolled in this study. Among these 14 patients, guidewire insertion through the mesh of previously placed stents failed in 2 patients. As a result, these two patients underwent only unilateral UCSEMS deployment. Because clinical success was not obtained, transmural placement of the UCSEMS under Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guidance to the segment of the liver not being drained was performed in those patients. The molting technique was attempted in 12 patients, proving successful in all patients. The technical success rate was therefore 92.8% (12/14). Mean procedure time was 23.2 min. Conclusion: This novel stent delivery system with a dilation function may be useful in endoscopic revision techniques for bilateral UCSEMS deployment.

Prospective comparison study between 19-gauge needle with .025-inch guidewire and 22-gauge needle with novel .018-inch guidewire during EUS-guided transhepatic biliary drainage (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: If the diameter of the intrahepatic bile duct is much less dilated, bile duct puncture with a 19-gauge needle can be challenging during EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). These characteristics can decrease the difficulty of bile duct puncture, but use of a 22-gauge needle is less feasible because of poor visibility, maneuverability, and stiffness of the conventional .018-inch guidewire. A novel, improved .018-inch guidewire has recently become available. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of EUS-BD in patients with insufficient bile duct dilatation using a 22-gauge needle and the new .018-inch guidewire. METHODS: A 22-gauge needle was used as the puncture needle for intrahepatic bile ducts of diameters <1.5 mm, and a 19-gauge needle was selected for diameters ≥1.5 mm. As the primary endpoint of the study, the technical success rate of EUS-BD using a 22-gauge needle with the novel .018-inch guidewire was evaluated in patients with insufficient dilation of the intrahepatic bile duct. RESULTS: Forty-one patients who required EUS-BD were enrolled (22-gauge needle group, n = 18; 19-gauge needle group, n = 23). Technical success was obtained in all patients in the 19-gauge needle group. In the 22-gauge needle group, technical failure occurred in 2 patients because of nonidentification of the intrahepatic bile duct on EUS (technical success rate, 88.9%), and puncture of the bile duct itself was not performed in these patients. Mean procedure time was similar between the groups. Adverse events were observed in 16.7% of patients (3/16) in the 22-gauge needle group and in 34.8% of patients (8/23) in the 19-gauge needle group. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of using a 22-gauge needle with a novel .018-inch guidewire were comparable with a 19-gauge needle with a .025-inch guidewire, even in the case of insufficient intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. These results require verification in a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 19-gauge needles with a larger sample size. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000044441.).