Comparison of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, conventional echocardiography, exercise parameters, and dyssynchrony measurements in Fontan patients.

INTRODUCTION: Little data are available concerning the methods used in the long-term follow-up of Fontan patients. We analyzed the association between serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, conventional echocardiography findings, exercise parameters, and dyssynchrony measurements in patients who underwent Fontan surgery. METHODS: This study included 28 patients who underwent Fontan surgery (mean age 12.8 ± 4.36 years) and 27 healthy controls (mean age 12.5 ± 3.76 years). Echocardiography examinations and exercise tests were performed in both groups. The systemic ventricle was examined via echocardiography, dyssynchrony measurement was performed, the systemic ventricular myocardial performance index was calculated, and serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels were measured for all subjects. RESULTS: Lower cardiac output, stroke volume, maximal work, chronotropic index, maximal oxygen uptake, and higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels were observed in the Fontan group than in the control group (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between physical exercise parameters and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and dyssynchrony measurements. CONCLUSION: Measurements of exercise capacity, serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and dyssynchrony measurement were more valuable than conventional methods for assessing patients' clinical and functional status. Dyssynchrony measurements provided better information about ventricular status than did conventional echocardiography studies. While patients' systolic function determined by conventional echocardiography was normal, dyssynchrony measurements showed the opposite result. The negative relationship between serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, dyssynchrony measurements, and exercise capacity suggests that these parameters should be investigated further in Fontan patients.

Understanding the Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Airway Resistance in Patients with Severe COPD: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Purpose: We investigated the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on airway resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with severe airway obstruction and hyperinflation. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with data from severe COPD cases with those who underwent an 8-week PR program. Main inclusion criteria were having severe airflow obstruction (defined as a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <50%) and plethysmographic evaluation findings being compatible with hyperinflation supporting the diagnosis of emphysema (presence of hyperinflation defined as functional residual capacity ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) >120%). Primary outcomes were airway resistance (Raw) and airway conductance (Gaw) which were measured by body plethysmography, and other measurements were performed, including 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and COPD assessment test (CAT). Results: Twenty-six severe and very severe COPD patients (FEV1, 35.0 ± 13.1%; RV/TLC, 163.5 ± 29.4) were included in the analyses, mean age 62.6 ± 5.8 years and 88.5% males. Following rehabilitation, significant improvements in total specific airway resistance percentage (sRawtot%, p = 0.040) and total specific airway conductance percentage (sGawtot%; p = 0.010) were observed. The post-rehabilitation mMRC scores and CAT values were significantly decreased compared to baseline results (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Although there were significant improvements in 6-MWT value (p < 0.001), exercise desaturation (ΔSaO2, p = 0.026), the changes in measured lung capacity and volume values were not significant. Conclusion: We concluded that PR may have a positive effect on airway resistance and airway conductance in COPD patients with severe airflow obstruction.

Clinical Features of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients Undergoing Solid-Organ Transplant: Baskent University Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical features and treatment approaches, outcomes, and mortality predictors of COVID-19 in solid-organ transplant recipients have not been well defined. This study investigated the clinical features of COVID-19 infection in solid-organ transplant recipients at our center in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 23 solidorgan transplant recipients and 336 nontransplant individuals (143 previously healthy and 193 patients with at least 1 comorbidity) who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 disease in our hospital between March 2020 and January 2021. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of patients were compared. We used SPSS version 20.0 for statistical analysis. All groups were compared using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. P <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean age of solid-organ transplant recipients was 49.8 ± 13.7 years (78.3% men, 21.7% women). Among the 23 recipients, 17 (73.9%) were kidney and 6 (26.1%) were liver transplant recipients. Among nontransplant individuals, 88.7% (n = 298) had mild/moderate disease and 11.3% (n = 38) had severe disease. Among transplant recipients, 78.3% (n = 18) had mild/moderate disease and 21.7% (n = 5) had severe disease (P = .224). Transplant recipients had greater requirements for nasal oxygen (P = .005) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation (P = .003) and had longer length of intensive care unit stay (P = .030) than nontransplant individuals. No difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of mortality (P = .439). However, a subgroup analysis showed increased mortality in transplant recipients versus previously healthy patients with COVID-19 (P <.05). Secondary infections were major causes of mortality in transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 infection resulted in higher mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients versus that shown in healthy patients. More attention on secondary infections is needed in transplant recipients to reduce mortality.

Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?

Introduction: Pulmonary function tests are used in the evaluation of the respiratory system. Maneuvers during spirometry can create aerosols and spread viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Measures due to the pandemic can negatively affect both the number and the quality of the spirometry tests. There are no comparative studies on this subject. Materials and Methods: The tests conducted in the spirometry laboratory between November 2019 and November 2021 were evaluated. Result: Four hundred forty patients were included in the study. 50.5% of the patients were male and the mean age was 61.8 ± 16.5 years. The age, gender, height, and weight of the patients were similar. 75.2% (331) of the tests were evaluated as successful. The most common errors in tests were early termination (84.1%), uncooperative patients (29%), and poor effort (22.4%). The types of errors were not different between the two periods. The median number of tests performed for each patient was six. The total number of spirometry tests performed were 262 and 178 for 2019 and 2021 (p= 0.011), but test success remained unchanged over the years (p= 0.513). There was no significant difference between the three operators and the test success (p= 0.909), which was similar for both periods. However, the number of tests performed until the successful maneuver varied significantly (p= 0.009), and fewer maneuvers were required before the pandemic. Conclusions: According to this study, the measures taken during the pandemic did not affect the quality of spirometry, but they did lead to more tests being done up until the successful maneuver was performed.

Cross-sectional analysis of tobacco addiction in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has become an important health issue with consequences for special populations since 2019. Tobacco use is an important public health issue and tobacco users are a risk group for lung infections. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study is to obtain information about disease prevalence and severity, laboratory parameters, and changes in radiological findings between smokers and non-smokers who were hospitalized, followed up, and treated for COVID-19, and to find answers to critical questions regarding the response to antiviral and supportive therapy. Two hundred eighty-six patients who were hospitalized and treated between March 2020-February 2021 in the COVID-19 Isolation Ward of Baskent University Hospital were included in the study. The patients were grouped as current smokers, non-smokers, and ex-smokers. The groups were compared in terms of symptoms, laboratory findings, radiological findings, and treatment response. Result: The median age of the patients included in the study was 59 (IQR= 32). Of the patients, 40.6% were female and 59.4% were male. In our study, we discovered that there were fewer female smokers (p<0.001). When the current smokers (n= 56), non-smokers (n= 159), and ex-smokers (n= 71) were compared based on their findings, it was found that dyspnea was more common in current smokers (p= 0.009). Lung involvement was found to be more common (p= 0.002) and multifocal in the current smokers group (p= 0.038). The levels of oxygen saturation at the times of admission and discharge were lower in current smokers (p= 0.002 and p= 0.038). The need for nasal oxygen and noninvasive mechanical ventilation was also found to be higher in current smokers (p= 0.008 and p= 0.039). Systemic steroid requirement was higher in current smokers (p= 0.013). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality between current smokers, ex-smokers, and non-smokers (p= 0.662). Conclusions: The analysis of the findings of the patients hospitalized in the COVID-19 isolation ward indicated that COVID-19 leads to a more serious course in patients with a history of smoking.

Effect of Asbestos Exposure on the Frequency of EGFR Mutations and ALK/ROS1 Rearrangements in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicentric Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of asbestos exposure on cancer-driver mutations. METHODS: Between January 2014 and September 2018, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), and c-ros oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ROS1) alterations, demographic characteristics, asbestos exposure, and asbestos-related radiological findings of 1904 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were recorded. RESULTS: The frequencies of EGFR mutations, ALK, and ROS1 rearrangements were 14.5%, 3.7%, and 0.9%, respectively. The rates of EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements were more frequent in asbestos exposed non-smokers (48.7% and 9%, respectively). EGFR mutation rate was correlated to female gender and not-smoking, ALK rearrangement rate was correlated to younger age, not-smoking, and a history of asbestos exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The higher rate of ALK rearrangements in asbestos-exposed lung adenocarcinoma cases shows that asbestos exposure may most likely cause genetic alterations that drive pulmonary adenocarcinogenesis.

Nowadays COVID underestimates the other suspects.

The whole world has been facing the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 infection and every day we still find out new knowledge regarding the disease. COVID-19 which is the name given to the clinical syndrome related to this infection has been shown to own a wide diversity of clinical presentations which challenges the healthcare workers and makes difficult the diagnosis and management of patients. Pulmonary embolism is also an entity that accompanies this type of infection and sometimes it is difficult to differentiate between the two. Here we present a patient who was admitted inward with typical lesions on chest tomography for COVID-19, but that turned out to be a submassive pulmonary embolism case without any infection. This case is remarkable because it shows that patients suspected for COVID-19 should be carefully examined and that pulmonary embolism can per se mimick the parenchymal lesions caused by viral infections.

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Kidney and Liver Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The novel 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) was first described in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and subsequently announced as a pandemic on March 12, 2020. In several studies, solid-organ transplant recipients were reported to have higher risk for COVID-19. Here, we aimed to determine the frequency of COVID-19 in our kidney and liver transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 583 transplant patients who were admitted to our outpatient transplant clinics and emergency departments between March 1 and May 1, 2020. Seventy-four of them were liver transplant recipients (46 male, 28 female, of which 14 were pediatric and 60 were adult patients) and 509 of them were kidney transplant recipients (347 male, 162 female, of which 16 were pediatric and 493 were adult patients). We retrospectively evaluated demographic characteristics, currently used immunosuppressant treatment, present complaints, treatment and diagnosis of comorbid diseases, and results of COVID-19 tests. RESULTS: Of 583 transplant recipients, 538 were seen in our outpatient transplant clinics and 45 were seen in our emergency departments. Of these, 18 patients who had had cough and fever were evaluated by respiratory clinic doctors, and nasopharyngeal swab samples were taken. One kidney transplant recipient had a positive COVID-19 test; he was followed with home isolation. He received treatment with hydroxychloroquine (400 mg/day). The other 17 patients had negative tests. There were no mortalities due to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients also got affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the data of our centers, this effect is not much more different from the normal population. We recommend that transplant recipients should be warned in terms of personal hygiene and should be closely monitored by organ transplant centers. If there is an indication for hospitalization, they should be followed in an isolated unit, with no aggressive changes made to immunosuppressive doses unless necessary.

Turkish Thoracic Society Experts Consensus Report: Recommendations for Pulmonary Function Tests During and After COVID 19 Pandemic.

The recommendation of conducting pulmonary function tests (PFTs) from different societies during and after the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was rated by the experts of the Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) and presented as the TTS experts consensus report. Information about the topic has been provided.Globally, as of mid-May 2020, there have been over 4.4 million confirmed cases of COVID-19. There are two main routes of transmission of COVID-19: respiratory droplets and contact transmission. PFTs are non-invasive tests that are commonly performed in routine assessment and follow-up of patients in the pulmonology units. However, PFTs may generate aerosols and require sharing common surfaces. With regard to the high prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the community, PFTs should not be performed routinely in confirmed or suspected patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic. Because of the risk of human-to-human transmission of COVID-19, PFTs should be restricted to a small patient population with selected indications. Triage for COVID-19 should be performed prior to testing. Only essential PFTs such as spirometry, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), arterial blood gas analysis, or pulse oximetry should be performed in the selected cases. Tests should be scheduled to allow sufficient time for donning and doffing of the technical personnel with the full personal protective equipment (PPE) (gown, a filtering respirator mask, goggles or full-face shield, and disposable gloves), ventilation of the room, and application of post-test cleaning and disinfection procedures of the equipment and the testing room.

Value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory and cardiac functions in association with skeletal and neurophysiologic systems can be evaluated with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Compared to treadmill exercise test, CPET provides more comprehensive data about the hemodynamic response to exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We aimed to evaluate the relationship with CPET findings and coronary lesions identified on angiography in patients with angina pectoris who underwent teradmill exercise, CPET and coronary angiography (CAG). By this way we sought to examine the CPET parameters that might be predictive for coronary artery disease (CAD) before diagnostic exercise test results and ischemia symptoms develop. Thirty patients in whom CAG was planned because of symptoms and exercise test results were enrolled in the study. Oxygen consumption (VO2), carbondioxide production (VCO2), minute ventilation (VE), maximum work rate (WR), DVO2/DWR and O2 pulse (VO2/HR) values were calculated. Significant CAD was defined as ≥ 50% narrowing in at least one of the coronary arteries. RESULT: The mean age was 60.4 ± 8.9 years ve 21 (65.6%) of subjects were male. On CAG, CAD was detected in 19 (59.4%) patients. Maximum heart rate, heart rate reserve (HRR), VE/VCO2 measured at anaerobic threshold (AT) and VO2(mL/kg/min) were significantly differed in patients with CAD than those without (p= 0.031; p= 0.041; p= 0.028; p= 0.03 respectively). Peak VO2, VO2/WR and O2 pulse values were higher in patients with normal angiographic results than those with CAD but the difference did not reach to statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study indicate that among CPET parameters AT VE/VCO2, ATVO2 (mL/kg/dk) and HRR can have predictive value in the diagnosis of CAD. We think that these parameters might be used in the evaluation of patients with angina and dyspnea suspected of CAD. In conclusion parameters obtained during the test that are not influenced by patient's effort might increase the value of CPET in the diagnosis CAD.

The methods other than spirometry in the early diagnosis of COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. The diagnosis od COPD is based on the presence of clinical symptoms and the fact that the ratio of post-bronhodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced expiratory vital capacity(FEV1/FVC) is less than 0.70. Persistent limitation of airflow which is a characteristics of COPD is reproducible and most common lung function test that is why it is usually measured by spirometry. The small airway diseases and the parenchymal destruction play a role in the pathogenesis of COPD at different rates over time resulting in chronic airflow limitation. These pathologies are not always together at the same time and the contribution of those to the development of COPD differ from one individual to another. The pathophysiological involvement of small airways in COPD has been confirmed. When the obstruction of the small airways occur either by mucus, smooth muscle hypertrophy, inflammatory infiltration or air wall thickening; then the consequence is the increased resistance and ventilation impairment. The parenchymal destruction can be estimated via scanning and at the initial assessment of a COPD patient, it gives information about the concomitant pulmonary diseases and/or differential diagnosis. There is an increasing interest on symptomatic individuals whose whose COPD diagnosis has not been confirmed yet with spirometry but diagnosis is based on alternative methods and approaches. Although these methods nowadays are commonly used for the clinical research, they will offer an opportunity to the clinician to find out the COPD patients at an early stage. Herein we will discuss the available methods other than spirometry in the early diagnosis of COPD before the overt disease is confirmed.

Turkish Thoracic Society Consensus Report: Interpretation of Spirometry.

ÖZET: Günümüzde spirometre ölçümlerinin uygulama ve yorumlama nitelik güvencesi "American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society" standartlari ile belirlenmistir. Dünyada oldugu gibi ülkemizde de birçok laboratuvar bu standartlari kullanmaktadir. Buna karsin, farkli laboratuvarlardan farkli degerlendirme sonuçlari görebilmek mümkündür. Bu rapor, ülkemizdeki solunum fonksiyon testi laboratuvarlarinda yapilan degerlendirmelerin standardizasyonunu saglamak amaci ile hazirlanmistir.

Causes of Hemoptysis in Renal Transplant Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Hemoptysis is a symptom that can be caused by airway disease, pulmonary parenchymal disease, or pulmonary vascular disease, or it can be idiopathic. Infection is the most common cause of hemoptysis, accounting for 60% to 70% of cases. Hemoptysis is also an initial symptom of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome, although it may be absent at presentation in one-third of patients. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage is characterized by disruption of the alveolar-capillary basement membranes because of either injury or inflammation of the arterioles, venules, or capillaries, resulting in bleeding in alveolar spaces. To date, no study in the literature has investigated the cause of hemoptysis in renal transplant patients. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the causes of hemoptysis in renal recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data included in this study were obtained from 352 renal transplant patients who were consulted by the pulmonology department regarding hemoptysis between 2011 and 2017 at Baskent University. Patient medical records were reviewed for demographic, clinical, radiographic, bronchoscopic features, and microbiology data. Immunosuppressive drugs and clinical outcome data were also noted. RESULTS: This study included 352 renal transplant patients (139 male patients with mean age of 34.9 ± 7 years and 113 female patients with mean age of 31.1 ± 5 years). Hemoptysis was detected in 17 patients (4.8%),with 3 (0.85%) having massive hemoptysis as a result of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome. Fourteen of our patient group (4%) had pneumonia, and Aspergillus species was detected in 5 patients (1.4%). The only reason for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage was immunosuppressive agents, including sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSIONS: Hemoptysis is an important respiratory symptom in renal transplant patients. Although community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia may result in hemoptysis, drug-induced diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and Aspergillus infection should be considered for causes in renal transplant patients.

Utility of Mean Platelet Volume to Diagnose Pneumonia in Patients With Solid-Organ Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Despite improved success with solid-organ transplant procedures, recipients remain at risk for infections, including pneumonia, due to their immunosuppressive regimens. In solid-organ transplant patients, clinical findings of pneumonia can be nonspecific, and diagnosis of pneumonia may be difficult as several conditions (drug lung, hypervolemia, infections, hemorrhage) can led to pulmonary infiltrates, mimicking pneumonia in these patients. The role of mean platelet volume, a predictor of inflammatory disease, with elevated values inversely correlated with inflammatory problems, in the diagnosis of pneumonia has not yet been investigated in solid-organ transplant patients. Here, we retrospectively investigated mean platelet volume in diagnosis of pneumonia in transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of solid-organ transplant patients from 2011 to 2016 were reviewed for demographic, clinical, radiographic, laboratory, and microbiology data. Transplant type, immunosuppressive drugs, and clinical outcomes were noted. Pneumonia diagnosis was based on clinical respiratory symptoms and signs, imaging findings, positive microbiological tests, pathologic findings, laboratory findings, or effective clinical treatment trials. RESULTS: Our study included 70 patients (47 male/23 female; mean age of 46 ± 14 years), comprising 26 liver and 44 renal transplant recipients. Pneumonia was diagnosed radiologically in 30 patients (42.9%), with procalcitonin positive in 11 patients (36.7%), C-reactive protein elevated in 29 patients (96.7%), and leukocytes increased in 6 patients (20%). When laboratory measurements were compared with mean platelet volume, mean platelet volume values were significantly lower in patients with pneumonia who had elevated procalcitonin levels (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: We found that mean platelet volume for diagnosis of pneumonia in solid-organ transplant patients was not a promising tool. Considering the difficulties in caring for transplant patients with pulmonary infiltrates, clinical decisions should be based on clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and radiologic findings.

[Turkish Thoracic Society national spirometry and laboratory standards]. / Türk Toraks Dernegi ulusal spirometri ve laboratuvar standartlari.

The application quality of pulmonary function tests (PFT) carries high importance since it affects the quality of health services. "Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors in Turkey Study," which was published in 2013 showed that only 22.6% of PFTs performed in the secondary care institutions in our country were compatible with the standards. This finding reveals the standardization problem in spirometry applications in our country. Currently, the criteria for the application and evaluation of spirometer measurements were defined by American and European Respiratory Societies standards. Several laboratories use these standards in our country as in the world. But, national laboratory standards that are suitable for the conditions in our country have not been defined yet. This report was prepared to ensure the application of spirometry in optimal conditions, to minimize intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory differences and mistakes, and to standardize in our country. In this report, we focused on the standards concerning laboratory conditions, equipment, and technician specifications, test application, evaluation of test quality, infection control, and reference values.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification Versus ARISCAT Risk Index: Predicting Pulmonary Complications Following Renal Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic renal failure are prone to pulmonary complications. Renal transplant recipients should undergo complete preoperative evaluation to determine risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia risk index correlate well with incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Here, we compared their accuracy in predicting pulmonary complications following renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of renal transplant recipients between years 2004 and 2015. We collected patient data on Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia risk index, including demographics, smoking history, comorbidities, preoperative pulmonary risk score, laboratory results, surgery information, history of lower respiratory tract infection 1 month pretransplant, urgency of surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and pulmonary complications within 1 month posttransplant. RESULTS: Of 172 patients (123 males; mean age 38.82 y), 22 (12.8%) developed pulmonary complication during the first month posttransplant, including effusion (9 patients), pneumonia (10 patients), respiratory inefficiency (2 patients), and pulmonary embolism (1 patient). Atelectasis was observed in 95.4% of patients with complications. A positive correlation was observed between age and development of complications (r = 0.171; P = .025). Regarding risk score, 75% of patients at high risk and 19.5% at intermediate risk developed pulmonary complications. Patients with low-risk scores had significantly lower complications than intermediate- and high-risk groups (P < .001). A positive correlation was observed between preoperative risk score and complications (r = 0.34; P < .001). There was no association between the American Society of Anesthesiologists scores and postoperative complications (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was found to be a weaker modality to predict pulmonary complications after renal transplant; as it relates to the general health status, than the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia risk index.

Culture-Positive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Infection: Clinical and Laboratory Features of Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Aspergillosis is a common fungal infection among solid-organ transplant recipients. Even after awareness of this infection occurs, there are still gaps in nonculture diagnostic tests, which can delay treatment initiation. Here, we aimed to define the common traits of pulmonary aspergillosis infection among solid-organ transplant recipients, thus shedding light on prevention and early diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a database search of patients at Baskent University who had a positive aspergillosis culture between January 2010 and March 2016. Among 20 patients identified, 15 (mean age of 50.93 ± 11.17 y, 2 female and 13 male patients) with solid-organ transplant were included in the study. RESULTS: Of the 15 study patients, 7 were heart transplant, 6 were kidney transplant, and 2 were liver transplant recipients. Three patients had positive aspergillosis cultures from extrapulmonary specimens (1 brain biopsy and 2 wound swap cultures). Other patients with positive cultures were from bronchoalveolar lavage (6 patients), sputum (4 patients), both bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum (1 patient), and deep tracheal aspiration specimen (1 patient). Aspergillus fumigatus was the most common species. Mean hospitalization duration was 31.53 days (range, 2-135 d). Although all patients had positive culture results, 7 patients (46.7%) had negative galactomannan test results at the time of culture specimen collection. Positive galactomannan test results were statistically higher in 6 heart transplant patients (P = .045). All patients had fever at presentation, and 13 patients had been referred to the pulmonary disease department before positive culture results were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for pulmonary aspergillosis and its clinical presentation in solid-organ transplant recipients are still unclear. Although the expected time for aspergillosis infection in solid-organ transplant recipients is 6 months after transplant, clinicians must remember the nonspecific presentation of infections in these patients and be aware of the reliability of diagnostic tools.

Peripheral Muscle Strength Indicates Respiratory Function Testing in Renal Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Muscle wasting occurs in renal recipients due to decreased physical performance, and decreased respiratory muscle strength may occur due to changes in structure and function. Data are scarce regarding the roles of sarcopenia and nutritional status on respiratory muscle function in these patients. Here, we evaluated interactions among peripheral muscle strength, sarcopenia, nutritional parameters, and respiratory muscle function in renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine patients were prospectively enrolled between September and April 2016 at Baskent University. Forced vital capacity values (via pulmonary function tests), respiratory muscle strength (via maximal static inspiratory and expiratory pressures), and peripheral muscle strength (via hand grip strength test) were recorded. Nutritional parameters, fat weight, arm circumference, waist circumference, and C-reactive protein levels were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 99 patients, 68 were renal transplant recipients (43 men, mean age: 39.09 ± 10.70 y) and 31 were healthy participants (14 men, mean age: 34.94 ± 10.95 y). Forced vital capacity (P < .001, r = 0.65), maximal inspiratory (P = .002, r = 0.39) and expiratory (P < .001, r = 0.4) pressure, and hand grip strength showed significant relations in transplant recipients. Positive correlations were found between serum albumin levels and both hand grip strength (P = .16, r = 0.347) and forced vital capacity (P = .03, r = 0.436). Forced vital capacity was statistically different between renal recipients and healthy participants (P = .013), whereas maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures were not (P > .05). No statistically significant relation was observed between biochemical parameters and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (P ? .05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory function and peripheral muscle strength were significantly related in renal transplant recipients, with significantly lower peripheral muscle strength suggesting the presence of inadequate respiratory function. Peripheral and respiratory muscle training and nutritional replacement strategies could help to improve postoperative respiratory function.

Evaluation of nephrotoxicity and prognosis in patients treated with colistin due to hospital-acquired pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Colistimethate sodium (CMS) is frequently used in the treatment of nosocomial multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections. Nephrotoxicity is the most important side effect. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of colistin on nephrotoxicity and to assess prognosis in patients treated with CMS due to hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with CMS for HAP due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii were included in this cohort study. RESULT: We evaluated 281 patients treated with two different brands of CMS whose administration dose is different: imported (n= 58, low dose/kg) and domestic (n= 223, high dose/kg). Nephrotoxicity developed in 175 patients (62.3%). The median age (73 vs. 66 years, p= 0.004) and mortality rates were higher (66.9% vs. 52.8%, p= 0.022) in patients having nephrotoxicity. The patients receiving high dose/kg had higher nephrotoxicity rate (67.7% vs. 41.4%, p< 0.001). The clinical, bacteriological response and mortality rates of the whole group were 52.0%, 61.0%, 61.6%, respectively. The clinical and bacteriological response rates were similar in the different dose groups. Multivariate analysis showed that nephrotoxicity was associated with domestic brand depending on use of high dose (OR= 3.97), advanced age (ß= 0.29, p= 0.008), male gender (OR= 2.60), hypertension (OR= 2.50), red blood cells transfusion (OR= 2.54), absence of acute kidney injury (OR= 10.19), risk stage of RIFLE (OR= 11.9). CONCLUSIONS: Nephrotoxicity is associated with the use of high dose colistin, age, gender, hypertension, red blood cells replacement and RIFLE stage. The mortality rate is higher in patients developing nephrotoxicity.

Association Between Preoperative Pulmonary Risk Scores and Postoperative Complications in Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Patients who are being considered for renal transplant must undergo thorough preoperative pulmonary evaluation to determine risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between the preoperative pulmonary risk factor score and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent renal transplant at our institution between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, smoking history, comorbidities, and preoperative pulmonary risk factors (age, oxygen saturation, hemoglobin level, type of incision, duration of surgery, history of lower respiratory tract infection 1 month before surgery, urgency of surgery), and type of pulmonary complications within 1 month after transplant were recorded. RESULTS: Our study included 131 patients (94 male patients; mean age of 38.25 ± 12.96 y). Of total patients, 21(16%) developed complications during the first month after transplant, with 10 of the 21 (7.6% overall) developing pulmonary complications. These complications were pleural effusion (2 patients), pneumonia (3 patients), respiratory failure (2 patients), and pulmonary embolism (1 patient). There were no deaths directly attributed to the pulmonary complications. A significant correlation was observed between the preoperative pulmonary risk factor score and postoperative pulmonary complications in renal transplant recipients (P = .003). A positive correlation between the preoperative pulmonary scores and postoperative pulmonary complications existed among life-long nonsmokers (r = 0.371; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplant is an established modality in treatment of chronic renal failure. Prevention of pulmonary complications is essential for successful outcomes following transplant. Health care professionals involved with renal transplant and transplant centers should be aware of preoperative pulmonary risk factors. Patients should be observed so that these risk factors can be reduced before planned transplant. Moreover, we also suggest that smoking history should be considered as a preoperative pulmonary risk factor as it was found to be a factor leading to postoperative pulmonary complications in our study.