Social Needs Assessment and Linkage to Community Health Workers in a Large Urban Hospital System.

OBJECTIVES: Identifying social needs is a growing priority in primary care, but there is significant variation in how patients access services to meet such needs. This study identifies predictors of successful linkage with a community health worker (CHW) among patients with social needs seen in an outpatient setting. METHODS: This study uses a cross-sectional analysis of social needs assessments administered in an urban health system between April 2018 and December 2019. Social needs included: food insecurity, housing quality, housing instability, healthcare cost, healthcare related transportation, utilities, care for dependents, legal assistance, safety, and getting along with household members. Patients with at least 1 social need and accepting help were included in the analysis. On contact with a CHW, patients were entered into a separate database. The primary outcome was successful "linkage," defined by having a positive social needs assessment in the medical record and a corresponding record in the CHW database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of linkage. RESULTS: Among patients with at least 1 social need accepting help, 25% (758/3064) were linked to a CHW. Positive predictors included female gender (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63]), Spanish language preference compared to English (1.51 [1.14-1.03]), and having a food related need (1.35 [1.03-1.79]). Negative predictors included age 18 to 65 (0.34 [0.17-0.71] for age 18-24) and 0 to 5 (0.45 [0.24-0.78]) compared to over 65, non-Hispanic White race compared to Hispanic race (0.39 [0.18-0.84]), and having needs of getting along with household members (0.52 [0.38-0.71]) and safety (0.64 [0.42-0.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-five percent of patients who had at least 1 social need and were accepting help had a successful CHW linkage. Predictors of linkage suggest areas of further system-level improvements to screening and referral interventions to target at risk patients and communities.

Missing the mark: ongoing missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis at an urban medical center despite universal screening recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Despite established recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to scale up testing efforts in the USA, this study shows full scale implementation of these recommendations may still be lacking. We hypothesize that patients experience ongoing missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of HIV, despite frequent encounters to Montefiore Medical Center (MMC), an integrated hospital system in the Bronx, NY. METHODS: Retrospective chart review via electronic medical records of patients newly diagnosed with HIV in 2012 and 2013 at varied MMC clinical sites. Missed opportunities were defined as > 1 prior health care encounter at MMC within three calendar years of diagnosis, in which HIV testing was not offered for those who had a prior negative test or no prior test. RESULTS: There were 218 patients newly diagnosed with HIV at MMC during the study period; 31% presented with a CD4 <200 cells/mm3; 22% were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Patients (56%) without a prior HIV test had an average 4.72 clinical encounters at MMC within the 3 years prior to their HIV diagnosis. Over 95% of visits prior to diagnosis occurred in emergency departments (EDs) or primary care outpatient department (OPDs) and accounted for the vast majority of missed opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: HIV infected patients continue to present late to care, with low CD4 and commonly utilize OPDs and EDs, where missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis are common. Practices that address augmentation of current HIV testing strategies are needed, especially in outpatient and first-contact acute care settings.

Comparable sustained virologic suppression between community- and academic-based HIV care settings.

PURPOSE: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic in the United States is evolving because of factors such as aging and geographic diffusion. Provider shortages are also driving the restructuring of HIV care delivery away from specialized settings, and family medicine providers may play a larger role in the future. We attempted to compare the effectiveness of HIV treatment delivered at community versus hospital care settings. METHODS: The outcome of interest was sustained virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements ≤400 copies/mL within 1 year after antiretroviral initiation. We used data from the multistate HIV Research Network cohort to compare sustained virologic suppression outcomes among 15,047 HIV-infected adults followed from 2000 to 2008 at 5 community- and 8 academic hospital-based ambulatory care sites. Community-based sites were mostly staffed by family medicine and general internal medicine physicians with HIV expertise, whereas hospital sites were primarily staffed by infectious disease subspecialists. Multivariate mixed effects logistic regression controlling for potential confounding variables was applied to account for clustering effects of study sites. RESULTS: In an unadjusted analysis the rate of sustained virologic suppression was significantly higher among subjects treated in community-based care settings: 1,646 of 2,314 (71.1%) versus 8,416 of 12,733 (66.1%) (P < .01). In the adjusted multivariate model with potential confounding variables, the rate was higher, although not statistically significant, in the community-based settings (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.16). CONCLUSION: Antiretroviral therapy can be delivered effectively through community-based treatment settings. This finding is potentially important for new program development, shifting HIV care into community-based settings as the landscape of accountable care, health reform, and HIV funding and resources evolves.

Comorbidity-related treatment outcomes among HIV-infected adults in the Bronx, NY.

Aging, HIV infection, and antiretroviral therapy have been associated with increasing rates of chronic comorbidities in patients with HIV. Urban minority populations in particular are affected by both the HIV/AIDS and chronic disease epidemics. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes among HIV-infected adults in the Bronx and describe comorbidity-related treatment outcomes. This was a cross-sectional study of 854 HIV-positive adults receiving care at 11 clinics which provide HIV primary care services; clinics were affiliated with a large urban academic medical center. Data on blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, and glycemic control were collected through standardized chart review of outpatient medical records. We found prevalence rates of 26%, 48%, and 13% for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, respectively. Older age, obesity, family history, and current protease inhibitor use were consistently associated with comorbidity. Diabetes treatment goals were achieved less often than BP and lipid goals, and concurrent diabetes was a significant predictor for BP and lipid control. In conclusion, major cardiovascular-related comorbidities are prevalent among HIV-positive adults in the Bronx, especially older and obese individuals. Differences exist in comorbidity-related treatment outcomes, especially for patients with concurrent diabetes. Because cardiovascular risk is modifiable, effective treatment of related comorbidities may improve morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients.