Abdominal Imaging Manifestations of Recreational Drug Use.

Recreational drug use is a burgeoning health issue worldwide, with a variety of presenting symptoms and complications. These complications can be secondary to the toxic effects of the drug itself, drug impurities, and nonsterile injection. The abdominal radiologist is likely to encounter patients who use drugs recreationally and may be responsible for recognizing and reporting these acute conditions, which in some cases can be life threatening. Because these patients often present with an altered mental state and may deny or withhold information on drug use, the underlying cause may be difficult to determine. The most commonly used drugs worldwide include cocaine, cannabinoids, opioids, and amphetamines and their derivatives. Complications of use of these drugs that can be seen at abdominopelvic CT can involve multiple organ systems, including the soft tissue and gastrointestinal, genitourinary, vascular, and musculoskeletal systems. A diverse range of abdominal complications associated with these drugs can be seen at imaging, including disseminated infections, gastrointestinal ischemia, and visceral infarction. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings of these complications to accurately diagnose these entities and help guide workup and patient treatment. ©RSNA, 2020.

Immediate Tube Feeding after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Early Return to Goal Tube Feeds without Added Complications.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is frequently performed for delivery of nonoral enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients. Tube-based supplement initiation is often delayed for a variety of reasons despite evidence that EN interruption results in worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if early initiation of EN after PEG placement is safe and well-tolerated in critically ill patients and if early initiation of EN results in more goal-accomplished days of EN. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent PEG and at least 24 hours of EN. Patients were stratified according to time to tube- feed initiation: immediate (< one hour), early (one to four hours), and late (four to 24 hours). RESULTS: 'Ihe three groups were similar with respect to demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day mortality. Sixty-one percent of patients in the immediate group were advanced to the previously-met goal EN rates compared to 24% and 18% in the early and delayed groups, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Immediate reinitiation of nonoral EN after PEG procedure is safe and is associated with reaching goal nutrition faster.

WHIPPLE PROCEDURE: PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY VERSUS PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY: A LITERATURE REVIEW.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of oncologic morbidity and mortality worldwide. The definitive surgical management for pancreatic cancer includes pancreaticoduodenectomy with either anastomosis to, or implantation of remnant pancreas to the stomach (pancreaticogastrostomy) or the jejunum (pancreaticojejunostomy). Operative morbidity and mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy frequently results from complications associated with a pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leak. Pancreaticogastrostomy is an alternative method of restoring pancreatic continuity with the gut, which has been employed by a number of institutions showing some benefit in operative mortality.

The Use of an Indwelling Catheter Protocol to Reduce Rates of Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) have been associated with increases in morbidity and mortality as well as increased costs of hospitalization. At our institution, we implemented a protocol for indwelling catheter use, maintenance, and removal based on Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, in efforts to reduce CAUTI rates. METHODS: A hospital committee of quality stewards focused on several measures which included staff education, modification of existing systems to ensure compliance, and auditing of patient care areas for catheter utilization before implementation of the protocol. Pre- and postintervention postoperative cohorts were then identified through American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) for prevalence of CAUTI. Data were collected through chart review and postdischarge patient interviews. RESULTS: A total of 3873 patients were identified between September 2007 and December 2010. Thirty-six patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with a CAUTI in the preintervention group (N = 1404) compared to 38 (1.5%) patients who were diagnosed with a CAUTI in the postintervention group (N = 2469). There was a 1.1% decrease in CAUTI rate after protocol implementation (P < .028). This reduction in rates resulted in annual estimated savings of $81,840 to $320,540 annually. CONCLUSION: A simple, multifaceted approach consisting of staff education and changing existing processes to reflect best care practices has the potential to significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative CAUTI.

Use of a Modified American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program to Enhance 30-Day Post-Trauma Readmission Detection.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury remains the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a large economic burden. One fourth of annual Medicare expenditures result from readmissions, including trauma. The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) has elevated care for >200 trauma programs worldwide. We use ACS TQIP, which does not include 30-day outcomes featured in the ACS NSQIP, affecting observed readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN: Trauma patients were subjected to the 30-day follow-up with the ACS NSQIP tools to assess readmission rates. The existing standard hospital and trauma registry data review was used to determine readmission, with the same group assessed for readmission using the information collected with the modified TQIP tools. All data collected via this method were patient reported and verified by review of records at our facility and via patient-authorized outside record review. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-eight consecutive patients were admitted to the trauma service during the study period and 378 (54.1%) were contacted by telephone for interview. Demographic characteristics were similar (p = NS). The readmission rate changed from 4.01% to 2.4% using the hospital and trauma registry subset (p = NS). Readmission rate by the modified TQIP method was 7.1% (p < 0.03). Readmitted patients did not differ with respect to routine follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesized that our observed and actual readmission rates differed. We discovered a significant difference in reported rates. Incorporating an NSQIP-like postdischarge feedback process can improve the accuracy of hospitals' readmission data and complication reporting, and thereby improve the value of the information TQIP uses as benchmarks.

Surgical Value of Elective Minimally Invasive Gallbladder Removal: A Cost Analysis of Traditional 4-Port vs Single-Incision and Robotically Assisted Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: As the cost of health care is subjected to increasingly greater scrutiny, the assessment of new technologies must include the surgical value (SV) of the procedure. Surgical value is defined as outcome divided by cost. STUDY DESIGN: The cost and outcome of 50 consecutive traditional (4-port) laparoscopic cholecystectomies (TLC) were compared with 50 consecutive, nontraditional laparoscopic cholecystectomies (NTLC), between October 2012 and February 2014. The NTLC included SILS (n = 11), and robotically assisted single-incision cholecystectomies (ROBOSILS; n = 39). Our primary outcomes included minimally invasive gallbladder removal and same-day discharge. Thirty-day emergency department visits or readmissions were evaluated as a secondary outcome. The direct variable surgeon costs (DVSC) were distilled from our hospital cost accounting system and calculated on a per-case, per item basis. RESULTS: The average DVSC for TLC was $929 and was significantly lower than NTLC at $2,344 (p < 0.05), SILS at $1,407 (p < 0.05), and ROBOSILS at $2,608 (p < 0.05). All patients achieved the same primary outcomes: minimally invasive gallbladder removal and same day discharge. There were no differences observed in secondary outcomes in 30-day emergency department visits (TLC [2%] vs NTLC [6%], p = 0.61) or readmissions (TLC [4%] vs NTLC [2%], p > 0.05), respectively. The relative SV was significantly higher for TLC (1) compared with NTLC (0.34) (p < 0.05), and SILS (0.66) and ROBOSILS (0.36) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nontraditional, minimally invasive gallbladder removal (SILS and ROBOSILS) offers significantly less surgical value for elective, outpatient gallbladder removal.