Efficacy of a standardized extract of Matricariae chamomilla L., Melissa officinalis L. and tyndallized Lactobacillus acidophilus (HA122) in infantile colic: An open randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Infant colic (IC) is a prevalent physiological event of infants, which can disrupt the child's home environment. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a mixture of Matricariae chamomilla L., Melissa officinalis L. and tyndallized Lactobacillus acidophilus (HA122) compared with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and with simethicone for the treatment of IC. METHODS: A multicenter randomized comparative study was conducted in infants with colic, according to Rome III criteria, who were randomly assigned to receive M. chamomilla L., M. officinalis L. and tyndallized L. acidophilus (HA122) (Colimil® Plus® ; Milte Italia Spa, Milan, Italy) (Group A), L. reuteri DSM 17938 (Group B) and simethicone (Group C). Treatment was given to subjects for 28 days. KEY RESULTS: One-hundred and seventy-six patients completed the study. Mean daily crying time at day 28 was significantly lower in group A (-44, 95% CI: -58 to -30, P<.001) and group B (-35, 95% CI: -49 to -20, P<.001) when compared to group C. No significant difference was observed between Group A and Group B (mean difference: -9 minutes, 95% CI -23 to +5, P=.205). At day 28, 39 of 57 (68.4%) of infants in Group C responded to the treatment compared with 57 out of 60 patients (95%) of Group A and 51 out of 59 (86.4%) of Group B (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that administration of M. chamomilla L., M. officinalis L. and tyndallized L. acidophilus (HA122) and L. reuteri DSM 17938 are significantly more effective than simethicone in IC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02708238.

Low mean impedance in 24-hour tracings and esophagitis in children: a strong connection.

Esophageal multiple intraluminal impedance baseline is an additional impedance parameter that was recently related to esophageal integrity. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between mean esophageal impedance value and endoscopic findings in a large group of children. Children with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux submitted to both endoscopy and impedance were included. Esophagitis was graded according to the Los Angeles classification. Mean impedance value was automatically calculated over 24-hour tracings. Data were adjusted for age through z-score transformation using percentiles normalized by the LMS (Lambda for the skew, Mu for the median, and Sigma for the generalized coefficient of variation) method. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, multiple, and stepwise regression were used. P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. A total of 298 impedance tracings were analyzed. Endoscopic and histological esophagitis were detected in 30 and 29% patients, respectively. Median baseline z-score was significantly decreased both in proximal (P = 0.02) and distal (P = 0.01) esophagus in patients with endoscopic (but not histological) esophagitis. Patients with more severe esophagitis showed the lowest z-score. Bolus exposure index and the number of reflux episodes were the variables that were significantly associated with the baseline z-score. Impedance z-score is significantly decreased in infants and children with endoscopic esophagitis. Severity of esophagitis, bolus exposure index, and number of reflux episodes are factors influencing mean esophageal impedance.

GER and GERD in children: to treat or not to treat?

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a normal physiologic process, consisting in the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus. It occurs several times per day in healthy infants, children, and adults. In contrast, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is present when the reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Distinguishing GER from GERD may often be tricky. The diagnosis of GERD has to be inferred by performing tests showing excessive frequency or duration of reflux events, esophagitis, or a clear association of symptoms and signs with reflux events in the absence of alternative diagnoses. Only in older children and adolescents with typical reflux symtoms, a time-limited trial of acid suppressive treatment may be useful as diagnostic test. A proper differential diagnosis between GER, GERD and other possible conditions mimicking reflux is crucial in order to target the treatment, avoiding the overuse of acid suppressive medications which currently represents a major source of concern. In this review we went through the evidence-based possible strategies to manage both psychologic GER and GERD.

Behind the (impedance) baseline in children.

Impedance baseline is a new parameter recently related to esophageal integrity. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different factors on impedance baseline in pediatric patients. We analyzed the impedance baseline of 800 children with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Mean impedance baseline was automatically calculated throughout 24-hour tracings. The presence of different age groups and of esophagitis was evaluated. Unpaired t-test, Spearman rank correlation, polynomial, and regression plot were used for statistical analysis. Age-related percentile curves were created. We considered a P-value<0.05 as statistically significant. Impedance baseline was significantly (P<0.001) lower in younger compared to older children up to 48 months. The mean increase of baseline per month was much higher in the first 36 months of life (47.5 vs. 2.9 Ohm in Channel 1 and 29.9 vs. 2.3 Ohm in Channel 6, respectively) than in older ages. Patients with esophagitis showed significantly decreased impedance baseline (P<0.05). Infants (especially in the first months of life) and young children present a significantly lower impedance baseline compared to older children both in proximal and distal esophagus. The presence of esophagitis may also determine a decreased impedance baseline regardless of the age of the patients.

Baseline esophageal impedance according to different time intervals.

Baseline impedance (BImp) reflects esophageal integrity. The study aims to identify the optimal method to calculate BImp. Mean BImp was calculated in 20 consecutive multichannel intraluminal impedance recordings including and excluding impedance events (IEs) (reflux, swallows, and gas episodes) in all channels during the full recording and during the first period of 1 minute without an IE every hour (method 1), every 2 hours (method 2), or 4 hours (method 3). BImp obtained during the total recording was set at 100%, and the variation (difference in BImp for the different methods) and variability (difference in BImp during one analysis period) were assessed. All children underwent endoscopy. No child had esophagitis. The mean difference over the six channels, in percentage, between BImp over the total recording with and without IE was ≈ 1.2% and comparable for each channel (range -5.87-6.99%). A mean of 980 IE were excluded in each tracing, and it took between 4 and 24 hours to delete all events in one tracing. The difference of BImp obtained with and without IE was mainly caused by the gas episodes at the upper and swallows in the lower channel. The mean BImp according to the three 1-minute analysis methods was comparable with the mean BImp according to the 24-hour analysis. The automatic determination of the mean BImp over the total tracing including the IE is an adequate method. In isolated tracings with numerous IE, the calculation of the mean BImp over 1 minute every 4 hours is an alternative option. Companies should develop software to calculate the mean BImp during the whole registration deleting all IE for the analysis.

Impact of antisecretory treatment on respiratory symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.

The effect of antisecretory treatment on extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease was evaluated. Seventy-eight children presenting with typical and extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent a multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII/pH). Children with a positive MII/pH were randomly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine H(2) -receptor antagonists (H(2) RAs) during 3 months. At the end of the treatment period, all patients were recalled. A second treatment period of 3 months was given to those patients who were not symptom-free after 3 months. Thirty-five of the forty-one (85.4%) children with a pathologic MII/pH presented with extraesophageal symptoms and were treated with PPIs (omeprazole; n:19) or H(2) RAs (ranitidine; n:16) for 12 weeks. After 3 months, 11/19 (57.9%) PPI-treated patients had a complete resolution of symptoms; 6/8 nonresponders were treated with PPI for another 3 months and became all symptom-free. The other two underwent a Nissen fundoplication. Only 5/16 (31.2 %) patients treated with H(2) RAs had a complete resolution of symptoms after 3 months; 1/11 was treated again with H(2) RAs during 3 months, and 10/11 were changed to PPIs. In 3/10, a partial resolution of symptoms was achieved, while in 7/10, a complete remission was obtained (P < 0.05). Antisecretory reflux treatment improves extraesophageal reflux symptoms. The efficacy of PPIs is superior to that of H(2) RAs in these children.

Short duration of breastfeeding and early introduction of cow's milk as a result of mothers' low level of education.

Inappropriate infant feeding including a lack of breastfeeding and the early introduction of cow's milk are the most common forms of infant feeding malpractice. To evaluate the hypothesis that infant feeding malpractices are associated with mothers' low level of education, questionnaires were administered to 400 mothers of infants below 12 mo of age divided into 3 groups according to their various educational levels. Items included the type of milk given at birth and at 1, 3 and 6 mo of age. To investigate the efficacy of paediatricians in orienting infant feeding, the same questionnaire was given to 30 paediatricians in primary paediatric healthcare, in hospitals or in private practices. Initiation of breastfeeding was similar in the three groups. An analysis of the data showed that an increasing number of infants born to mothers of low and intermediate educational level did not receive exclusive breastfeeding compared with those with a higher level of education, a difference that was significant as early as 1 mo of age. In infants aged 3 mo, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 37%, 40% and 65% in the three groups, respectively, in relation to progressively increasing levels of education. In infants of 6 mo, the respective prevalence rates were 13%, 15% and 48%. Early introduction of cow's milk showed a similar correlation with educational level. A greater number of infants born to mothers with a low level of education received cow's milk at 3 mo of age compared with those born to mothers with an intermediate education (12% vs 5%). A similar difference was observed between the latter group and infants born to mothers with a high educational level (0%). This pattern was supported by data for infants at 6 mo of age with prevalence rates for cow's milk feeding of 39%, 20% and 0% in the three groups in association with progressively increasing level of educational (p < 0.05). The analysis of the paediatricians' response to the questionnaire showed that while physicians know and correctly prescribe age-related infant nutrition regimens, they are unaware that a substantial number of mothers do not comply with what they prescribe. Overall, these data support the relationship between a low educational level and infant feeding malpractice and suggest that a more effective role should be played by paediatricians in supporting an adequate duration of breastfeeding and the use of formula rather than cow's milk protein.