Assessing the quality of forced vital capacity measurement in patients with systemic sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Forced vital capacity (FVC) is an important tool for monitoring lung functions in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, several disease manifestations may influence the quality of FVC test in SSc. We aimed to assess the quality of FVC measurements according to current guidelines in patients with SSc and determine the factors that may affect results. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, SSc patients and age/sex matched controls underwent spirometry. Quality of FVC measurements were graded according to updated American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines. Demographics, clinical features and parameters that may affect FVC test quality were compared between SSc patients with high and low quality FVC test. RESULTS: 98 SSc patients (90 female) and 100 controls were included. The rate of high quality FVC measurement in SSc patients was significantly lower in SSc patients compared to controls. (80 % vs 60.2 % p = 0.002). Among SSc patients; diffuse disease, ILD, anti-topoisomerase 1 antibody positivity, immunosuppressive use, flexion contractures of hands, reduced mouth opening and decreased chest expansion were more frequent in patients with low quality FVC (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with muscle weakness and medium/high risk of malnutrition were also numerically higher in low quality FVC group. Presence of more than one condition that may affect FVC quality was significantly higher among patients with low quality FVC. CONCLUSION: A significant percent of SSc patients had low quality FVC measurement. Physicians should be aware of this point while interpreting FVC test results especially in SSc patients with more than one condition that may affect the quality of the test.

Factors that predict development of chronic kidney disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving biologic DMARDs and mortality rates.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the choice of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/ts-DMARDs), factors associated with the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and mortality in RA patients with CKD receiving b/ts-DMARDs. METHODS: Two thousand one hundred forty-one RA (79.4% female) patients were included in the analysis from the HUR-BIO prospective registry. Patients were divided into the CKD group and the non-CKD group. Age and gender-matched patients were selected from the non-CKD group, and then three main groups were determined. CKD was staged according to the glomerular filtration rate criteria. The clinical characteristics of the patients, disease activities, treatment choices, drug retention rate, and mortality rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: CKD was detected in 90/2141 (4.2%) RA patients on b/ts-DMARDs. Forty patients (2.3%) developed CKD during follow-up after the initiation of b/ts-DMARDs. In the CKD group, anti-TNF agents were chosen as the first-line b/ts-DMARDs therapy in 64.4% of patients, with etanercept leading in 31 (34.4%) patients. In multivariate analysis, age at the start of treatment, DAS-28-ESR at last visit, amyloidosis, hypertension, and history of smoking were the factors associated with the development of CKD in RA patients receiving b/ts-DMARDs. The mortality rate in RA-CKD patients until the onset of the pandemic was 15.41 per 1000 patient years, whereas it was 85.9 per 1000 patient years after the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities and control of disease activity are critical in the development of CKD in RA patients receiving b/ts-DMARDs. While there was no significant difference in mortality rate between CKD and non-CKD patients, the overall mortality rate increased after the COVID-19 pandemic duration in both groups.

Hematologic Malignancy Risk in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients Treated with TNF Inhibitors: The Real-Life Data from the HUR-BIO Registry.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the incidence of hematologic malignancy (HM) among inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) compared with the general Turkish population. METHODS: HUR-BIO (Hacettepe University Rheumatology Biologic Registry) is a single-center biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) registry since 2005. Patients with IA, including rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, or psoriatic arthritis who had at least one visit after the TNFi were screened from 2005 to November 2021. Standardized incidence rates (SIR) were calculated after adjustment for age and gender and compared with the 2017 Turkish National Cancer Registry (TNCR). RESULTS: Of the 6139 patients registered in the HUR-BIO, 5355 used any TNFi at least once. The median follow-up duration was 2.6 years for patients receiving TNFi. Thirteen patients developed a HM on follow-up. In these patients, the median age at the IA onset was 38 (range, 26-67), and the median age at the HM diagnosis was 55.5 (range, 38-76). Patients using TNFi had an increased HM incidence (SIR 4.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.35-7.05). Ten patients with HM were under 65 years of age. In this group, there was a higher incidence of HM in both men (SIR 5.15, 95% CI 1.88-11.43) and women (SIR 4.76, 95% CI 1.74-10.55). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of HMs in inflammatory arthritis patients receiving TNFi was four times higher than in the general Turkish population.