Management of Small Papillary Thyroid Cancers.

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. With increasing imaging utilization, there has been an increase in the recognition of small, indolent cancers that would otherwise go undiagnosed. Historically, the surgical recommendation for all patients with thyroid cancer was a total thyroidectomy. However, over the last 20 years, there have been numerous studies evaluating the de-escalation of interventions for low-risk thyroid cancers, transitioning from total thyroidectomy to thyroid lobectomy or active surveillance when indicated. Here, we review the current literature and recommendations with each of these treatment options.

Examining National Guideline Changes Association With Hemithyroidectomy Rates by Surgeon Volume.

INTRODUCTION: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines established that hemithyroidectomy (HT) is an appropriate treatment for patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. HT rates increased since the ATA guidelines were released; however, the relationship between surgeon volume and the initial extent of surgery has not been established. METHODS: A statewide database was used to identify patients with thyroid cancer who underwent initial thyroidectomy from 2013 to 2020. High-volume thyroid surgeons were defined as those who performed >25 thyroid procedures per year. A mixed-effect logistic model was used to compare low- and high-volume surgeons' initial extent of surgery pre-2015 and post-2015 ATA guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used to describe other surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis included 3199 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent initial thyroidectomy. Twenty-four surgeons (6%) were considered high-volume; they performed 48% (n = 1349) of the operations. After the 2015 ATA guidelines were released, the rate of HT increased significantly for low- (23% to 28%, P = 0.042) but not high-volume (19% to 23%, P = 0.149) surgeons. Low-volume surgeons had significantly higher rates of readmission (P = 0.008), re-operation (P = 0.030), complications (P < 0.001), and emergency room visits (P = 0.002) throughout the entire study period. CONCLUSIONS: The publication of the 2015 ATA guidelines was associated with a significant increase in HT rates, primarily in low-volume thyroid surgeons. While low-volume surgeons began performing more HTs, they continued to have higher rates of readmission, reoperations, complications, and emergency room visits than high-volume surgeons.

What do patients want to know about surgery for low-risk thyroid cancer? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making about treatment for low-risk thyroid cancer requires patients and surgeons to work together to select treatment that best balances risks and expected outcomes with patient preferences and values. To participate, patients must be activated and ask questions. We aimed to characterize what topics patients prioritize during treatment decision-making. METHODS: We identified substantive questions by patients with low-risk (cT1-2, N0) thyroid cancer during audio-recorded consultations with 9 surgeons at 2 unique health care systems. Logistics questions were excluded. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify major themes among patients' questions and surgeon responses. RESULTS: Overall, 28 of 30 patients asked 253 substantive questions, with 2 patients not asking any substantive questions (median 8, range 0-25). Patients were 20 to 71 years old, mostly White (86.7%) and female (80.0%). The questions addressed extent of surgery, hormone supplementation, risk of cancer progression, radioactive iodine, and etiology of thyroid cancer. When patients probed for a recommendation regarding extent of surgery, surgeons often responded indirectly. When patients asked how surgery could impact quality of life, surgeons focused on oncologic benefits and surgical risk. Patients commonly asked about hormone supplementation and radioactive iodine. CONCLUSION: Patient questions focused on the decision regarding extent of surgery, quality of life, and nonsurgical aspects of thyroid cancer care. Surgeon responses do not consistently directly answer patients' questions but focus on the risks, benefits, and conduct of surgery itself. These findings suggest an opportunity to help surgeons with resources to improve shared decision-making by providing information that patients prioritize.

Stones left unturned: Missed opportunities to diagnose primary hyperparathyroidism in patients with nephrolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Nephrolithiasis is a sequela of primary hyperparathyroidism and an indication for parathyroidectomy. The prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism in patients with nephrolithiasis is 3% to 5%; however, recent studies suggest that many hypercalcemic patients with nephrolithiasis never undergo workup for primary hyperparathyroidism. Our goal is to evaluate primary hyperparathyroidism screening rates at a tertiary academic health institution and identify opportunities to increase referral rates in patients presenting with nephrolithiasis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 15,725 patients across an academic health system who presented with nephrolithiasis between 2012 and 2020. Calcium levels measured within 6 months of presentation were identified, and those with hypercalcemia (≥10.3 mg/dL) were reviewed if parathyroid hormone levels were measured. Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were evaluated to see if they were referred to a specialist for treatment. RESULTS: Of 15,725 patients presenting with nephrolithiasis, 12,420 (79%) had calcium levels measured; 630 patients (4.0%) were hypercalcemic, and 207 (33%) had parathyroid hormone levels measured. Patients were more likely to have parathyroid hormone levels sent if they were older, had higher calcium levels, or presented to an outpatient clinic (P = .028, P = .002, P < .001). We identified 89 patients (0.6%) with primary hyperparathyroidism, of which only 35 (39%) were referred for treatment. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients presenting with nephrolithiasis ultimately diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism was significantly lower than others have reported. Additionally, a substantial number of patients with nephrolithiasis did not have calcium and/or parathyroid hormone levels measured. These missed opportunities for diagnosis are critical as early definitive management of primary hyperparathyroidism can prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis and other primary hyperparathyroidism-related end organ effects.