Economic evaluation of lifestyle interventions in infertility management: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Infertility, a global concern affecting both sexes, is influenced by modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. While the literature predominantly underscores the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in the realm of infertility treatment, a holistic compilation analysing the economic dimensions of such interventions is lacking. This systematic review aimed to fill this gap by evaluating the economic facets of lifestyle interventions in the management of infertility. METHODS: An exhaustive search was conducted within the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception to February 2024. The aim was to find articles related to the economic aspects of lifestyle interventions in infertility management. These included clinical studies covering economic outcomes and economic evaluations. The Drummond Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: From an initial yield of 7555 articles, five studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, comprising three cost-effectiveness analyses, one prospective cohort study and a randomized controlled trial, all of which were undertaken in high-income countries (the Netherlands, Australia and Japan). These studies included patients receiving infertility treatments for conditions such as unexplained infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, ovulation disorders, or mild male infertility, inclusive of individuals with and without obesity. The women who participated in these studies were up to 45 years of age. The findings suggested that integrating lifestyle intervention programmes tends to enhance pregnancy and live birth outcomes. These programmes encompass coaching, psychological or behavioural guidance, nutritional adjustments, exercise regimes, weight management, smoking cessation and mindfulness techniques. Moreover, these interventions are likely to be more cost-effective than standard infertility care. CONCLUSION: For couples embarking on infertility treatments, the integration of lifestyle interventions into their management strategy not only fosters clinical benefits but also represents a cost-effective alternative to conventional care, particularly within high-income settings.

The Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objective: Lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects people of all ages and sexes. Evidence of cardiovascular risk factors in lichen sclerosus has been continuously reported; however, the definitive association remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the association between cardiovascular risk factors and lichen sclerosus. Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were systematically searched from inception to May 2024 to identify the literature reporting the association between cardiovascular risk factors and lichen sclerosus. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Results: We included 16 eligible studies: nine case-control studies, six retrospective cohort studies, and one cross-sectional study. A total of 432,457 participants were included. Lichen sclerosus was significantly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus with an odds ratio of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.21-3.52). Although not statistically significant, a trend of increasing risk in hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and metabolic syndrome was observed among lichen sclerosus patients, with odds ratios of 1.56 (95% CI: 0.90-2.70), 1.44 (95% CI: 0.94-2.23), 5.84 (95% CI: 0.37-92.27), and 1.36 (95% CI: 0.52-3.54), respectively. Conclusions: Lichen sclerosus was associated with diabetes mellitus and potentially correlated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Population-based prospective observational studies are required to further elucidate these findings and assess the impact of these associations.

Genetic alterations in myeloid sarcoma among acute myeloid leukemia patients: insights from 37 cohort studies and a meta-analysis.

Introduction: Variations in mutation rates among acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with myeloid sarcoma (MS) underscore the need for a thorough examination. This meta-analysis was conducted to fill the information gap concerning mutation frequencies in AML patients presenting with MS. Materials and methods: This study included retrospective and prospective cohorts. It examined genetic alterations in AML patients with and without MS across all age groups. The search strategy employed terms such as "acute myeloid leukemia," "extramedullary," "granulocytic sarcoma," "myeloid sarcoma," and "leukemic cutis" in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Excluded from the study were reviews, case reports, and case series with fewer than 10 cases. Statistical analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: The primary analysis incorporated data from 37 cohorts involving 5646 diagnosed AML patients and revealed a 17.42% incidence of MS. The most prevalent mutation among AML patients with MS was FLT3-ITD, with a pooled prevalence of 17.50% (95% CI 12.60% to 22.50%; I2 82.48%). The dominant fusion gene was RUNX1::RUNX1T1, displaying a pooled prevalence of 28.10% (95% CI 15.10% to 41.20%; I2 96.39%). In comparison, no significant intergroup differences were observed for NPM1, FLT3-ITD, KIT, and IDH2 mutations. Interestingly, the CEBPA mutation exhibited protective effects for MS patients, with an odds ratio of 0.51 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.81; I2 0%). Conversely, the NRAS mutation was associated with an increased risk of MS development, with an odds ratio of 5.07 (95% CI 1.87 to 13.73; I2 0%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis sheds light on the prevalence of genetic mutations in AML patients with MS, providing insights into the unique characteristics of the mutations and their frequencies. These discoveries are crucial in informing therapeutic and prognostic decisions for individuals with myeloid sarcoma.

Bidirectional association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and fatty pancreas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests a potential relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and fatty pancreas, as both conditions are associated with fat deposition in the liver and pancreas, respectively. The meta-analysis aimed to investigate the bidirectional association between NAFLD and fatty pancreas, as well as their respective effects on disease severity. METHODS: A systematic search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, from inception to August 2022, was conducted to identify observational studies examining the association between NAFLD and fatty pancreas, as well as their impact on disease severity. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our analysis included 26 case-control or cross-sectional studies, comprising 67,803 participants. We observed a significant association between NAFLD and an increased odds of having fatty pancreas (OR, 6.18; 95% CI, 4.49-8.51; I2 = 92%). Similarly, fatty pancreas was significantly associated with an increased odds of having NAFLD (OR, 9.56; 95% CI, 5.09-17.95; I2 = 83%). Furthermore, the presence of fatty pancreas was associated with a 1.75-fold increased risk of severe NAFLD based on ultrasonographic classification (95% CI, 1.46-2.10; I2 = 0%). Among NAFLD patients, the coexistence of fatty pancreas was associated with a trend towards increased odds of having non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 0.65-18.93; I2 = 82%) and advanced fibrosis (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.52-11.80; I2 = 76%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis discloses a bidirectional association between NAFLD and fatty pancreas, emphasizing the importance of understanding the intricate relationship between these two conditions.