Cancer-Chemotherapy-Related Regimen Checks Performed by Pharmacists of General Hospitals Other than Cancer Treatment Collaborative Base Hospitals: A Multicenter, Prospective Survey.

Although prescription review is an important role for pharmacists in anticancer drug therapy, there are no guidelines in Japan that specify what pharmacists should check for in chemotherapy regimens. This prospective multicenter survey aimed to investigate the implementation of chemotherapy regimen checks by pharmacists in general hospitals by focusing on 19 recommended confirmation items designed to enhance chemotherapy safety. This study involved 14 hospitals within the National Hospital Organization in different regions of Japan. The top five cancers in Japan (gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and gynecological) were targeted and specific chemotherapy regimens were analyzed. This study assessed the amount of time required for regimen checks, the number of confirmation items completed, the number and the content of inquiries raised regarding prescriptions, and the pharmacists' opinions using a questionnaire that had a maximum score of 10 points. Pharmacists checked 345 and 375 chemotherapies of patients in the control group (CG) and recommended items group (RIG), respectively. The mean time periods required for completing a chemotherapy regimen check were 4 min and 14 s (SD ±1 min and 50 s) and 6 min and 18 s (SD, ±1 min and 7 s) in the CG and RIG, respectively. The mean of the recommended items for the CG = 12.4 and for the RIG = 18.6. The items that the pharmacists did not confirm included urine protein (sixty-nine cases, 18.4%), allergy history (four cases, 1%), previous history (two cases, 0.5%), and a previous history of hepatitis B virus (sixty-nine cases, 18.4%). The number of inquiries for a doctor's prescription order was higher in the RIG than in the CG (41 vs. 27 cases). This multicenter survey demonstrated the potential effectiveness of implementing 19 recommended confirmation items in the regimen checks by pharmacists in general hospitals other than cancer treatment collaborative base hospitals.

Preventive effect of 20 mEq and 8 mEq magnesium supplementation on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: The protective effect of magnesium (Mg) supplementation against cisplatin (CDDP)-induced nephrotoxicity has been widely described; however, the optimal dose of Mg supplementation is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether 20 mEq of Mg supplementation is more effective than 8 mEq Mg in preventing CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity, as well as the associated risk factors, in cancer patients treated with CDDP-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Pooled data of 272 patients receiving 20 mEq or 8 mEq Mg supplementation to CDDP-based chemotherapy from a multicenter, retrospective, observational study were compared using propensity score matching. Separate multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors for renal failure induced by each treatment dose. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of nephrotoxicity between the 8 mEq and 20 mEq groups (P = 0.926). There was also no significant difference in the severity of nephrotoxicity, elevated serum creatinine levels, and decreased estimated creatinine clearance levels between the two groups. Cardiac disease and albumin levels were identified as independent risk factors for CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: We did not find an advantage of 20 mEq over 8 mEq Mg supplementation in terms of a preventive effect against CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity. The optimal dose of Mg supplementation for the prevention of CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity remains unknown, and further studies are warranted.

Risk Factors for Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin (CDDP)-induced nephrotoxicity is a concern in CDDP-based chemotherapy. The goal of this multicenter retrospective study was to identify potential risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Clinical data were reviewed for 762 patients who underwent chemotherapy including CDDP ≥60 mg/m2 per day from Spring 2014 to September 2016. CDDP nephrotoxicity was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for acute kidney injury. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: CDDP nephrotoxicity was observed in 165 patients (21.7%). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher rate of CDDP nephrotoxicity in patients with cardiac disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-3.93, p = 0.03), hypertension (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.06-2.32, p = 0.02), and high-dose CDDP therapy (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.50-3.07, p < 0.01). Magnesium (Mg) supplementation (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.93, p = 0.02) and diuretic use (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.63, p < 0.01) were also independent risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that high-dose CDDP and comorbidities of cardiac disease and hypertension are independent risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity. Therefore, close monitoring of serum creatinine values during CDDP treatment is recommended for patients with these risk factors. In addition, Mg supplementation and administration of diuretics might be effective for prevention of CDDP nephrotoxicity.