Non-Compartment and compartmental pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of Kedrion FIX concentrate.

BACKGROUND: An open-label phase II, multicenter clinical trial was conducted at 11  Haemophilia Centres in  Italy, Romania, and Turkey, to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of high purity, plasma-derived, double virus inactivated and double nano-filtered factor IX (pd-FIX) concentrate (Kedrion FIX), EudraCT Number: 2005-006186-14. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 16 previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B were enrolled in the study. At enrolment, 14 underwent the first PK assessment (PK I), and the second PK (PK II) assessment was performed after six months of treatment (5 on-demand and nine prophylaxis) at the end of the study. PK parameters were evaluated by Non-Compartmental Analysis (NCA), One-Compartment model (OCM), and Two-Compartment Model (TCM). Efficacy of Kedrion FIX in all 16 patients was evaluated by the number of bleeding events, and clinical response following the infusions. Periodic FIX inhibitor assays and thrombogenicity tests were scheduled throughout the study to assess the safety of the drug. RESULTS: As compared to the published data on PK of pdFIX, Kedrion FIX displayed a longer half-life (22.37-55.73 hrs), reduced clearance, and regular volume of distribution at PK I by both NCA and OCM. The comparison of outcomes of PK II with those of PK I by OCM,  also showed significant changes, particularly in patients on prophylaxis, who showed some improved parameters of PK. Due to two outlier values at the end of the trial, the NCA parameters of PK I were not compared to those of PK II. Breakthrough bleeds were successfully treated with 1 or 2 infusions. No significant adverse events were observed during the study. DISCUSSION: During the six-month clinical study period, the use of Kedrion FIX resulted in a safe and effective pd-FIX concentrate with excellent PK characteristics.

Effect of late prophylaxis in hemophilia on joint status: a randomized trial.

Essentials High-quality data are lacking on use of prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia and arthropathy. SPINART was a 3-year randomized clinical trial of late/tertiary prophylaxis vs on-demand therapy. Prophylaxis improved function, quality of life, activity and pain but not joint structure by MRI. Prophylaxis improves function but must start before joint bleeding onset to prevent arthropathy. SUMMARY: Background Limited data exist on the impact of prophylaxis on adults with severe hemophilia A and pre-existing joint disease. Objectives To describe 3-year bleeding, joint health and structure, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and other outcomes from the open-label, randomized, multinational SPINART study. Patients/Methods Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 factor VIII exposure days, no inhibitors and no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years were randomized to sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII prophylaxis or on-demand therapy (OD). Data collected included total and joint bleeding events (BEs), joint structure (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), joint health (Colorado Adult Joint Assessment Scale [CAJAS]), HRQoL, pain, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), activity, and treatment satisfaction. Results Following 3 years of prophylaxis, adults maintained excellent adherence, with a 94% reduction in BEs despite severe pre-existing arthropathy; 35.7% and 76.2% of prophylaxis participants were bleed-free or had fewer than two BEs per year, respectively. As compared with OD, prophylaxis was associated with improved CAJAS scores (least squares [LS] mean, - 0.31 [n = 42] versus + 0.63 [n = 42]) and HAEMO-QoL-A scores (LS mean, + 3.98 [n = 41] versus - 6.00 [n = 42]), less chronic pain (50% decrease), and approximately two-fold less HRU; activity, Euro QoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) scores and satisfaction scores also favored prophylaxis. However, MRI score changes were not different for prophylaxis versus OD (LS mean, + 0.79 [n = 41] versus + 0.96 [n = 38]). Conclusions Over a period of 3 years, prophylaxis versus OD in adults with severe hemophilia A and arthropathy led to decreased bleeding, pain, and HRU, better joint health, activity, satisfaction, and HRQoL, but no reduction in structural arthropathy progression, suggesting that pre-existing joint arthropathy may be irreversible.

Hereditary Thrombophilia and thrombotic events in pregnancy: single-center experience.

Pregnancy is a normal physiological state that predisposes to thrombosis, determined by hormonal changes in the body. These changes occur in the blood flow (venous stasis), changes in the vascular wall (hypotonia, endothelial lesion) and changes in the coagulation factors (increased levels of factor VII, factor VIII, factor X, von Willebrand factor) and decreased activity levels of natural anticoagulants (protein C, protein S). In this study, we tried to determine a possible association between thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia in pregnant women. This is a retrospective study of 151 pregnant women with a history of complicated pregnancy: maternal thrombosis and placental vascular pathology (intrauterine growth restriction, preeclampsia, recurrent pregnancy loss), who were admitted in our hospital during the period January 2010 to July 2014. We performed genetic analyses to detect the factor V Leiden mutation, the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene, the C677T mutation and the A1298C mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene. The risk of thrombosis in patients with factor V Leiden is 2.66 times higher than the patients negative for this mutation (OR 2.66 95% CI 0.96-7.37 P=0.059). We did not find any statistical association with mutations in the MTHFR gene. Pregnant women with a family history of thrombosis present a 2.18-fold higher risk of thrombosis (OR 2.18 CI 0.9-5.26 P=0.085). Of 151 pregnant women, thrombotic events occurred in 24 patients: deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and ischemic stroke. The occurrence of thrombotic events was identified in the last trimester of pregnancy, but especially postpartum. Thrombosis in pregnancy is a redoubtable complication requiring an excellent cooperation between the obstetrician and anesthesiologist.

Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART).

BACKGROUND: The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3-year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS). PATIENTS/METHODS: SPINART is an open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multinational trial. Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6-24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII-FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg(-1) , three times weekly) or on-demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent-to-treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow-up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled and analyzed (n = 42 per group; mean age, 30.6 years; median treatment duration, 1.7 years). The median number of total bleeding episodes and total bleeding episodes per year were significantly lower with prophylaxis than with on-demand treatment (total, 0 vs. 54.5; total per year, 0 vs. 27.9; both P < 0.0001). No treatment-related adverse events occurred, and no patients developed FVIII inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS leads to a significant reduction in bleeding as compared with on-demand treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the established rFVIII-FS safety profile.

Development of inhibitors in haemophilia. Ongoing epidemiological study.

A number of 513 consecutive patients (494-haemophilia A and 19-haemophilia B) from eight haemophilia treatment centers have been investigated with Bethesda assay for the presence of factor VIII or IX inhibitors. The overall prevalence of inhibitors was 15.20%, 18.48% in severe, 5.60% in moderate and 12.24% in mild forms. The prevalence was higher than reported in most of the western countries. The age at start of substitution (p = 0.9775), the frequent switching of factor concentrates (p = 0.8931) were not relevant factors for the development of inhibitors. It is worth to be mentioned the unexpectedly occurrence of inhibitors in prior inhibitor negative (6/72) patients (during surgical interventions) probably due to their previous scarce substitution, occurrence which seems not being connected with the continuous infusion modality of factor VIII administration (p = 0.8341). In controversial situations, in the field of low titer (≤ 1 BU/ml) inhibitors for a reliable interpretation of the results the performance of recovery index and half-life time assessment of FVIII/IX was undertaken.