Effect of a Japanese Version of the Burns Wean Assessment Program e-Learning Materials on Ventilator Withdrawal for Intensive Care Unit Nurses.

BACKGROUND: No assessment tool for predicting ventilator withdrawal success is currently available in Japan. Thus, an accessible and valid assessment tool to address this issue is needed. The Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP) has been validated as a reliable predictor of ventilator withdrawal outcomes. However, nurses must be familiar with this tool to ensure its efficient utilization in clinical settings. PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the effect of a 26-item Japanese version of BWAP (J-BWAP) e-learning materials on ventilator withdrawal in a sample of intensive care unit nurses in Japan. METHODS: The BWAP was translated into Japanese, checked, and verified as the J-BWAP. Nonrandomized intensive care unit nurses from six hospitals were assigned to three groups, including Intervention Group 1 (e-learning in one session), Intervention Group 2 (e-learning over three sessions during 1 week), and the control group. The participants underwent pretests and posttests using web-based, simulated patients. The primary outcome measure was the difference in online pretest and posttest total scores among the two intervention groups and the control group. The feasibility of the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials was evaluated using four frameworks: acceptability, demand, implementation, and adaptation. RESULTS: Of the 48 participants in the study, 32 completed the posttest and were included in the analysis (dropout rate: 33.3%). The difference between pretest and posttest scores was significantly higher in the intervention groups than the control group (2 vs. -1, p = .0191) and in Intervention Group 2 than the control group (2.0 vs. -0.5, p = .049). The feasibility frameworks for the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials were mostly positive. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The development of the J-BWAP and training nurses using e-learning were shown to be feasible in this study. The J-BWAP contents are appropriate for predicting the outcome of mechanical ventilation withdrawal. The J-BWAP has the potential to become a common tool among Japanese medical professionals after the contents are further simplified for daily application in clinical practice. Subsequent studies should verify the reliability and validity of this tool and test the real-world utility of the J-BWAP using randomized controlled trials in Japanese clinical settings.

Quality indicators of palliative care for cardiovascular intensive care.

Healthcare providers working for cardiovascular intensive care often face challenges and they play an essential role in palliative care and end-of-life care because of the high mortality rates in the cardiac intensive care unit. Unfortunately, there are several barriers to integrating palliative care, cardiovascular care, and intensive care. The main reasons are as follows: cardiovascular disease-specific trajectories differ from cancer, there is uncertainty associated with treatments and diagnoses, aggressive treatments are necessary for symptom relief, and there is ethical dilemma regarding withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Quality indicators that can iterate the minimum requirements of each medical discipline could be used to overcome these barriers and effectively practice palliative care in cardiovascular intensive care. Unfortunately, there are no specific quality indicators for palliative care in cardiovascular intensive care. A few indicators and their domains are useful for understanding current palliative care in cardiovascular intensive care. Among them, several domains, such as symptom palliation, patient- and family-centered decision-making, continuity of care, and support for health care providers that are particularly important in cardiovascular intensive care.Historically, the motivation for using quality indicators is to summarize mechanisms for external accountability and verification, and formative mechanisms for quality improvement. Practically, when using quality indicators, it is necessary to check structural indicators in each healthcare service line, screen palliative care at the first visit, and integrate palliative care teams with other professionals. Finally, we would like to state that quality indicators in cardiovascular intensive care could be useful as an educational tool for practicing palliative care, understanding the minimum requirements, and as a basic structure for future discussions.

Minimum standards of clinical practice for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Early mobilization and rehabilitation has become common and expectations for physical therapists working in intensive care units have increased in Japan. The objective of this study was to establish consensus-based minimum clinical practice standards for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan. It also aimed to make an international comparison of minimum clinical practice standards in this area. METHODS: In total, 54 experienced physical therapists gave informed consent and participated in this study. A modified Delphi method with questionnaires was used over three rounds. Participants rated 272 items as "essential/unknown/non-essential". Consensus was considered to be reached on items that over 70% of physical therapists rated as "essential" to clinical practice in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Of the 272 items in the first round, 188 were deemed essential. In round 2, 11 of the 62 items that failed to reach consensus in round 1 were additionally deemed essential. No item was added to the "essential" consensus in round 3. In total, 199 items were therefore deemed essential as a minimum standard of clinical practice. Participants agreed that 42 items were not essential and failed to reach agreement on 31 others. Identified 199 items were different from those in the UK and Australia due to national laws, cultural and historical backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to develop a consensus-based minimum clinical practice standard for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.

Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVES: Moral distress occurs when professionals cannot carry out what they believe to be ethically appropriate actions because of constraints or barriers. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese translation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP). METHODS: We translated the questionnaire into Japanese according to the instructions of EORTC Quality of Life group translation manual. All physicians and nurses who were directly involved in patient care at nine departments of four tertiary hospitals in Japan were invited to a survey to assess the construct validity, reliability and factor structure. Construct validity was assessed with the relation to the intention to leave the clinical position, and internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. RESULTS: 308 responses were eligible for the analysis. The mean total score of MMD-HP (range, 0-432) was 98.2 (SD, 59.9). The score was higher in those who have or had the intention to leave their clinical role due to moral distress than in those who do not or did not have the intention of leaving (mean 113.7 [SD, 61.3] vs. 86.1 [56.6], t-test p < 0.001). The confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha confirmed the validity (chi-square, 661.9; CMIN/df, 2.14; GFI, 0.86; CFI, 0.88; CFI/TLI, 1.02; RMSEA, 0.061 [90%CI, 0.055-0.067]) and reliability (0.91 [95%CI, 0.89-0.92]) of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The translated Japanese version of the MMD-HP is a reliable and valid instrument to assess moral distress among physicians and nurses.

Quality indicators of palliative care for acute cardiovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: Although recent attention to palliative care for patients with cardiovascular diseases has been increasing, there are no specific recommendations on detailed palliative care practices. We proceed on a discussion of the appropriateness and applicability of potential quality indicators for acute cardiovascular diseases according to our previous systematic review. METHODS: We created a multidisciplinary panel of 20 team members and 7 external validation clinicians composed of clinical cardiologists, a nutritionist, a physiotherapist, a clinical psychologist, a critical and emergent care specialist, a catheterization specialist, a primary care specialist, a palliative care specialist, and nurses. After crafting potential indicators, we performed a Delphi rating, ranging from "1 = minimum" to "9 = maximum". The criterion for the adoption of candidate indicators was set at a total mean score of seven or more. Finally, we subcategorized these indicators into several domains by using exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen of the panel members (80%) were men (age, 49.5 ± 13.7 years old). Among the initial 32 indicators, consensus was initially reached on total 23 indicators (71.8%), which were then summarized into 21 measures by selecting relatively feasible time variations. The major domains were "symptom palliation" and "supporting the decision-making process". Factor analysis could not find optimal model. Narratively-developed seven sub-categories included "presence of palliative care team", "patient-family relationship", "multidisciplinary team approach", "policy of approaching patients", "symptom screening and management", "presence of ethical review board", "collecting and providing information for decision-maker", and "determination of treatment strategy and the sharing of the care team's decision". CONCLUSION: In this study we developed 21 quality indicators, which were categorized into 2 major domains and 7 sub-categories. These indicators might be useful for many healthcare providers in the initiation and enhancement of palliative care practices for acute cardiovascular diseases in Japan.

Potential palliative care quality indicators in heart disease patients: A review of the literature.

In spite of the increasing interest in palliative care for heart disease, data on the detailed methods of palliative care and its efficacy specifically in heart disease are still lacking. A structured PubMed literature review revealed no quality indicators of palliative care in heart disease. Therefore, we performed a narrative overview of the potential quality indicators in heart disease by reviewing previous literature concerning quality indicators in cancer patients. We summarize seven potential categories of quality indicators in heart disease: (1) presence and availability of a palliative care unit, palliative care team, and outpatient palliative care; (2) human resources such as number of skilled staff; (3) infrastructure; (4) presence and frequency of documentation or family survey; (5) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data and disease-specific patient quality of life such as The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); (6) questionnaires and interviews about the quality of palliative care after death, including bereaved family surveys; and (7) admission-related outcomes such as place of death and intensive care unit length of stay. Although detailed measurements of palliative care quality have not been validated in heart disease, many indicators developed in cancer patients might also be applicable to heart disease. This new categorization might be useful to determine quality indicators in heart disease patients.