Endometrial Cancer: Analysing Patterns of Recurrence and Real-Life Outcome Data Using the 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP Risk Stratification System.

AIMS: To evaluate patterns of recurrence and explore the prognostic differences between the 2018 FIGO staging system and the 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk stratification system of endometrial cancer with an emphasis on early-stage disease. BACKGROUND: The incidence of endometrial cancer has risen by around 60% since the 90's. It is projected that by 2035 endometrial cancer will be the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death amongst females. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study which included patients treated between 2010 and 2017. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was used to assess OS and RFS across different risk groups. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate prognostic risk factors implicated in recurrence. Different recurrence patterns across the subgroups were analysed with Pearson's chi-square test. RESULTS: The study included 692 patients with a recurrence rate of 14.9%. The median time to recurrence was 17.1 months (IQR:8.8-28.4). The mean OS varied between 97.2 months in the low-risk group to 63.1 months in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Mean RFS was 96.1 in the low-risk group and 58.9 in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). RFS was predicted by the following factors; high risk group (OR=3.87; p = 0.041), LVSI (OR=2.54, p = 0.005), carcinosarcoma (OR=2.20, p = 0.021) and serous subtype (OR=1.91, p = 0.01). Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for loco-regional and distant recurrence. Patients in the low-risk group were less likely to have distant recurrence (OR=0.08, p = 0.004). Similarly, negative LVSI and Grade 1 cancers were associated with decreased risk of distant recurrence (OR=0.34, p = 0.006 and OR=0.33, p = 0.007, respectively). There were no significant risk factors for loco-regional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk stratification provides accurate estimates of recurrence risk and survival. Those treated in line with current guidance have significantly better outcomes.

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery for Endometrial and Cervical Cancer.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has many benefits, in the form of reduced postoperative morbidity, improved recovery and reduced inpatient stay. It is imperative, however, when new techniques are adopted, in the context of treating oncology patients, that the oncological efficacy and safety are established rigorously rather than assumed based on first principles. Here we have attempted to provide a comprehensive review of all the contentious and topical themes surrounding the use of MIS in the treatment of endometrial and cervix cancer following a thorough review of the literature. On the topic of endometrial cancer, we cover the role of laparoscopy in both early and advanced disease, together with the role and unique benefits of robotic surgery. The surgical challenge of patients with a raised body mass index and the frail and elderly are discussed and finally the role of sentinel lymph node assessment. For cervical cancer, the role of MIS for staging and primary treatment is covered, together with the interesting and highly specialist topics of fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian transposition and the live birth rate associated with this. We end with a discussion on the evidence surrounding the role of adjuvant hysterectomy following radical chemoradiation and pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer. MIS is the standard of care for endometrial cancer. The future of MIS for cervix cancer, however, remains uncertain. Current recommendations, based on the available evidence, are that the open approach should be considered the gold standard for the surgical management of early cervical cancer and that MIS should only be adopted in the context of research. Careful counselling of patients on the current evidence, discussing in detail the risks and benefits to enable them to make an informed choice, remains paramount.

Reproductive outcome following abdominal myomectomy for a very large fibroid uterus.

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term reproductive outcome following abdominal myomectomy in women with very large fibroid uteri. It is a retrospective study of 90 subfertile women with the main outcome measure of live-birth rate following spontaneous and assisted conception. Mean age of the study population was 37 ± 5 years and mean uterine size was 21 ± 6 weeks. During follow-up (mean 50 ± 10 months), 28 (31%) pregnancies occurred; 18 spontaneous and 10 following IVF. The live-birth rate was 20% and the miscarriage rate was 32%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the chance of live birth was significantly reduced with increasing female age at the time of surgery (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002). The perioperative blood transfusion rate was 30% and the incidence of major complications was 6%. Fertility after abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri is possible, and its major determinant is female age at the time of surgery.

Peri-operative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri, and to assess the effect of relevant confounding variables on the occurrence of major peri-operative complications. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study of 200 abdominal myomectomies for fibroid uteri of 16 gestational weeks or greater. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the influence of important clinical variables on the risk of complications. A systematic literature search was conducted for evidence related to peri-operative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri. RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation) uterine size was 21±5 weeks. The overall rate of major complications was 30%. Peri-operative bleeding necessitating blood transfusion occurred in 49 (24.5%) cases. During surgery, two patients had bowel injury, two had bladder injury, seven women returned to theatre and two (1%) had hysterectomy. Four patients were re-admitted within 14 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of major complications was significantly higher in cases with a uterine size of 20 gestational weeks or more [odds ratio (OR) 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-10.2; p=0.03], where 10 or more fibroids were removed (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-10.8; p=0.05) and where midline skin incision was required (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.7-22.3; p=0.006). On comparison of primary vs repeat abdominal myomectomy, there was significantly higher blood loss (mean 1023±1112 ml vs 579±787 ml; p=0.02) and risk of major complications in the repeat myomectomy group (40% vs 5%; p<0.001). The systematic review identified only one study that reported a comparable risk of major complications related to abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri. CONCLUSION: The risk of organ injury, hysterectomy, re-operation or hospital re-admission after abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri is low, but the procedure is associated with a significant risk of bleeding necessitating blood transfusion. This risk is increased after repeat myomectomy, and in patients with a uterine size of 20 gestational weeks or larger, requiring removal of 10 or more fibroids, and requiring a midline skin incision.