The association between distal symmetric polyneuropathy in diabetes with all-cause mortality - a meta-analysis.

Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) is a common microvascular complication of both type 1 and 2 diabetes with substantial morbidity burden and reduced quality of life. Its association with mortality is equivocal. Purpose: To describe the association between DSPN and all-cause mortality in people with diabetes and further stratify by the type of diabetes based on a meta-analysis of published observational studies. Data Sources: We searched Medline from inception to May 2021. Study Selection: Original data were collected from case-control and cohort studies that reported on diabetes and DSPN status at baseline and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Data Extraction: was completed by diabetes specialists with clinical experience in neuropathy assessment. Data Synthesis: Data was synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. The difference between type 1 and 2 diabetes was investigated using meta-regression. Results: A total of 31 cohorts (n=155,934 participants, median 27.4% with DSPN at baseline, all-cause mortality 12.3%) were included. Diabetes patients with DSPN had an almost twofold mortality (HR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.68-2.27, I2 = 91.7%), I2 = 91.7%) compared to those without DSPN that was partly explained by baseline risk factors (adjusted HR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.37-1.87, I2 = 78.86%). The association was stronger in type 1 compared to type 2 diabetes (HR: 2.22, 95%CI: 1.43-3.45). Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses without significant publication bias. Limitations: Not all papers reported multiple adjusted estimates. The definition of DSPN was heterogeneous. Conclusions: DSPN is associated with an almost twofold risk of death. If this association is causal, targeted therapy for DSPN could improve life expectancy of diabetic patients.

Association of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy and Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy with All-Cause Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: People with diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) have increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the association between distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) or CAN with all-cause mortality is much less investigated. Thus, we set out to examine the effect of CAN and DSPN on all-cause mortality in a well-phenotyped cohort. METHODS: All diabetes cases (n = 1,347) from the catchment area of a secondary diabetes care centre who had medical examination including neuropathy assessment between 1997 and 2016 were followed up for all-cause mortality in the NHS Hungary reimbursement database until 2018. We investigated the association of CAN (Ewing tests) and DSPN (Neurometer) with all-cause mortality using Cox models stratified by diabetes type. RESULTS: Altogether, n = 131/1,011 persons with type 1/type 2 diabetes were included. Of the participants, 53%/43% were male, mean age was 46 ± 12/64 ± 10 years, diabetes duration was 13 ± 10/7 ± 8 years, 42%/29% had CAN, and 39%/37% had DSPN. During the 9 ± 5/8 ± 5-year follow-up, n = 28/494 participants died. In fully adjusted models, participants with type 1 diabetes patients with versus without DSPN had an increased mortality (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.4-8.63), while no association with CAN was observed. In type 2 diabetes, both DSPN and CAN independently increased mortality (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.64, and HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.17-1.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are compatible with an increased risk of mortality in people with type 1 diabetes and DSPN. Furthermore, we report a similarly strong association between DSPN and CAN and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Why Not to Use the Handgrip Test in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus?

OBJECTIVE: Historically, a set of 5 Cardiovascular Autonomic Reflex Tests (CARTs) were considered to be the gold standard in the assessment of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN). However, measuring diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) response to sustained handgrip is omitted in recent guidelines. We aimed to assess the association between the handgrip and the other 4 tests as well as to identify determinants of the handgrip test results in diabetic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 353 patients with diabetes (DM) were recruited (age: 60.2±7.4 years; female: 57.2%; BMI: 29.3±2.1 kg/m2; DM duration: 15.6±9.9 years; HbA1c: 7.8±1.4% (66 mmol/mol); with type 1 DM: 18.1%). CAN was assessed by 5 CARTs: the deep breathing test, Valsalva ratio, 30/15 ratio, handgrip and orthostatic hypotension test. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the handgrip test in the diagnosis of definite CAN were 24.6% (95%CI 17.7-33.1%) and 79.4% (95%CI 73.3-84.4%), respectively. Results of the handgrip test did not show any association with those of the deep-breathing test (y=0.004, p=0.563), 30/15 ratio (y=0.282, p=0.357), Valsalva ratio (y=-0.058, p=0.436) and orthostatic hypotension (y=-0.026, p=0.833). Handgrip test abnormality showed an independent association with higher initial diastolic BP (OR 1.05, p=0.0009) and an independent inverse association with the presence of hypertension (OR=0.42, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that the handgrip test should no longer be part of the cardiovascular autonomic testing being highly dependent on hypertensive status and baseline diastolic BP. Exaggerated exercise pressor response is proposed as putative mechanism for the inverse association between abnormal results of the handgrip test and hypertension. Adequate CARTs are important to allow their use in clinical trials and for the prevention of DM-associated complications by initiating early treatment.