Suboptimal care was frequent in severe child physical abuse cases and was mainly related to delayed diagnoses and ineffective secondary prevention.

AIM: Our aim was to assess suboptimal care before a diagnosis of severe child physical abuse in western France. METHODS: A confidential inquiry was carried out, based on children under 6 years of age who were hospitalised in the Nantes regional university hospital from 2016 to 2018. Two researchers retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the children who were reported to the authorities for suspected severe child physical abuse. Two experts determined the optimality of care and identified the main categories of suboptimal care. RESULTS: The median age of the 94 children included in the study was 8 months. A fifth of them had intra-cranial injuries and a quarter had fractures. One child died and a third had severe sequelae at hospital discharge. Included children frequently (37%) received suboptimal care before the diagnosis of severe CPA and this fell into two categories: delayed diagnosis was experienced by 17% and ineffective secondary prevention by 22%. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal care for severe child physical abuse was frequent and fell into two categories: delayed diagnosis and ineffective secondary prevention. These results can help us to design corrective actions.

Variations in Guidelines for Diagnosis of Child Physical Abuse in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Importance: The highly variable practices observed regarding the early detection and diagnostic workup of suspected child physical abuse contribute to suboptimal care and could be partially related to discrepancies in clinical guidelines. Objective: To systematically evaluate the completeness, clarity, and consistency of guidelines for child physical abuse in high-income countries. Evidence Review: For this systematic review, national or regional guidelines that were disseminated from 2010 to 2020 related to the early detection and diagnostic workup of child physical abuse in infants aged 2 years or younger by academic societies or health agencies in high-income countries were retrieved. The definitions of sentinel injuries and the recommended diagnostic workup (imaging and laboratory tests) for child physical abuse were compared. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to February 2021. Findings: Within the 20 included guidelines issued in 15 countries, 168 of 408 expected statements (41%) were missing and 10 statements (4%) were unclear. Among 16 guidelines characterizing sentinel injuries, all of them included skin injuries, such as bruises, hematoma, or burns, but only 8 guidelines (50%) included intraoral injuries and fractures. All 20 guidelines agreed on the indication for radiological skeletal survey, head computed tomography, and head magnetic resonance imaging but differed for those of bone scintigraphy, follow-up skeletal survey, spinal magnetic resonance imaging, cranial ultrasonography, chest computed tomography, and abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography. Additionally, 16 guidelines agreed on exploring primary hemostasis and coagulation but not on the tests to perform, and 8 guidelines (50%) mentioned the need to investigate bone metabolism. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that guidelines for the diagnosis of child physical abuse in infants were often clear but lacked completeness and were discrepant on major issues. These results may help identify priorities for well-designed original diagnostic accuracy studies, systematic reviews, or an international consensus process to produce clear and standardized guidelines to optimize practices and infant outcomes.

Bone Scintigraphy After a Negative Radiological Skeletal Survey Improves the Detection Rate of Inflicted Skeletal Injury in Children.

Background: Timely diagnosis of child physical abuse is of paramount importance. The added value of bone scintigraphy (BS) after a negative radiological skeletal survey (RSS) in children with suspected physical abuse has never been evaluated. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the extent to which BS could improve the detection rate of skeletal injury in children with suspected physical abuse with an initial negative RSS. Methods: We used discharge codes to retrospectively identify children evaluated for suspected physical abuse in a university hospital (Nantes, France). We included all consecutive children younger than 3 years old who underwent both RSS and BS, with an interval of ≤96 h between tests, from 2013 to 2019. BS and RSS results were interpreted independently during the study period. We specifically analyzed BS results for children with a negative RSS to assess the value of BS as an add-on test. Results: Among the 268 children ≤3 years old with suspected physical abuse who underwent RSS, 140 (52%) also underwent BS within 96 h and were included in the analysis. The median age was 6 months old (interquartile range: 3-8). The detection rate of ≥1 skeletal injury with RSS alone was 49% (n = 69/140, 95% CI: 41-58%) vs. 58% (n = 81/140, 50-66%) with RSS followed by add-on BS, for an absolute increase in the detection rate of 9% points (95% CI: 4-14%). The number of children with a negative RSS who would need to undergo BS to detect one additional child with ≥1 skeletal injury was 6 (95% CI: 4-11). Conclusion: In young children with suspected physical abuse with a negative RSS, add-on BS would allow for a clinically significant improvement in the detection rate of skeletal injuries for a limited number of BS procedures required. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Evaluation of a Temporal Association between Vaccination and Subdural Hematoma in Infants.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a temporal association between vaccination and subdural hematoma, the main feature of abusive head trauma. STUDY DESIGN: From a prospective population-based survey carried out in 1 administrative district in France between January 2015 and April 2017, including all infants between 11 and 52 weeks old who underwent a first cerebral imaging (computerized tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging), we conducted a nested case-control study. Vaccine exposure was compared between cases (infants with subdural hematoma) and 2-3 paired controls, without subdural hematoma or any other imaging findings compatible with abusive head trauma. Cases and controls were matched on chronological (±7 days) and gestational (≤33 vs >33 weeks) ages, respectively. Vaccination status was collected in the personal national pediatric health booklet. RESULTS: Among the 228 prospectively surveyed infants, 28 had subdural hematoma including 22 with abusive head trauma. The mean chronological age at imaging was 5.3 months among the 28 cases and the 62 controls, who did not differ significantly in median time since last vaccination (1.4 vs 1.3 months, P = .62) or frequency of at least 1 vaccination since birth (86% vs 89%; matched-pairs OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.17-3.86) or within 7 days (0.94, 0.08-6.96), 14 days (0.70, 0.12-2.92), or 21 days (0.48, 0.08-1.98) before cerebral imaging. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant temporal association between vaccination and subdural hematoma diagnosis, which must continue to be considered a red flag for abusive head trauma and child abuse.

Do abused young children feel less pain?

The objective of this study was to investigate whether acute pain in abused children was under recognized by doctors and nurses compared to children evaluated for accidental injuries. We hypothesize that an abused child's reaction to physical pain could be an additional symptom of this challenging diagnosis. For the observational prospective case control study in an emergency department, children were eligible when: younger than six years old, the reported trauma occurred within the previous seven days, the trauma comprised a bone injury or burn, and the child was able to express his or her pain. The case group comprised children for whom the medical team reported their abuse suspicions and supporting information to a court, and whose cases of abuse were subsequently confirmed. The control group consisted of children with a plausible cause for their injury and no obvious signs of abuse. The children were matched according to their age and type of trauma. The pain was assessed by doctors and nurses before analgesic administration using a certified pain scale. Among the 78 included children, pain was significantly less recognized in the abused children vs. the controls (relative risk=0.63; 95% CI: 0.402-0.986; p=0.04). We observed a discrepancy between the nurses' and doctors' scores for the pain assessments (Kappa coefficient=0.59, 95% CI: 0.40-0.77). Our results demonstrate that pain expression in abused children is under recognized by medical staff. They also suggest that abused children may have reduced pain expression after a traumatic event. Paying particular attention to the pain of abused children may also optimize the analgesic treatment.

[Clinic of somatoform disorders in abused adolescents]. / Clinique des troubles somatoformes chez les adolescents maltraités.

UNLABELLED: Child abuse represents a contributing factor to develop various psychopathological disorders, such as somatoform disorders. OBJECTIVES: Improving the detection of child abuse, based on the analysis of somatoform disorders and the comparison between non-abused and abused patients, in a population of hospitalized teens in a general pediatric ward. METHODS: A retrospective study at the University Hospital of Nantes, involving every adolescents from 11 to 16 y.o. hospitalized in pediatric ward and cured by the child psychiatrist medical team, whatever the reason, over the year 2012 (n=231). RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of hospitalized adolescents had history of abuse. Physical abuses were dominant (54% vs. 24% sexual vs. 22% psychological). Our study highlight a statistically significant difference on the frequency of somatoform disorders between abused adolescents and not abused witness population (70% vs. 40%; P=0.0001). Gastrointestinal complaints (25% vs. 14.2%; P=0.0434) and musculoskeletal pains (13.2% vs. 4.5%; P=0.0291) appeared more significantly in abused adolescents population rather than non-abused adolescents. Somatoform disorders were not related to the frequency or type of abuse, except for gastrointestinal complaints, being more frequent in patients who were psychologically abused (51.7% vs. 26.7% sexual vs. 11.8% physical; P=0.005). CONCLUSION: Somatoform disorders are an interesting way to spot adolescents suffering from abuse, justifying a systematic investigation for child abuse. It remains, however, a warning not directing to any specific type of abuse.

[How to detect and what to do with child abuse?]. / Repérage et conduite á tenir face à un enfant en danger.

Child abuse is a major public health problem. The consequences including death, but also physical injuries and psychological troubles. To know and recognize the possibility of child abuse is essential for all doctors. This diagnostic hypothesis must be considered alongside all pathologies in varied clinical presentations. The practitioner must keep in mind that an unusual location, incoherent mechanism, a health seeking delay, no painful expression are warning signs and particularly a traumatic injury unexplained in an infant who does not move. To overcome the denial that surrounds these situations, the health professional should emphasize teamwork and not hesitate in doubt to be hospitalized children or at least contact a specialized team.

[Recognizing clinical signs suggesting child abuse in young children]. / Repérage des signes cliniques evocateurs de maltraitance chez le petit enfant.

It is difficult to diagnose child abuse. Any injury to a child should raise the essential question as to its plausibility. Any incompatibility between the nature of the lesion and the child's age, or the explanations given, should suggest intentional injury. The presence of a bruise on an infant too young to move about is a serious warning sign. Any fractures before the infant is able to walk should raise the suspicion of intentional injury. Regardless of the type of abuse noted for an infant, it must be hospitalized. Supplementary examinations, in association with a psychosocial evaluation, will enable exploration for other lesions and the elimination of differential diagnoses. This allows the child to be protected, while including the family in the treatment process.