Public perspectives on inequality and mental health: A peer research study.

INTRODUCTION: Associations between structural inequalities and health are well established. However, there is limited work examining this link in relation to mental health, or that centres public perspectives. This study explores people's experience and sense-making of inequality in their daily lives, with particular consideration of impacts on mental health. METHODS: We conducted a peer research study. Participants had to live in one of two London Boroughs and have an interest in inequalities and mental health. Using social media, newsletters, local organisations and our peer researchers' contacts, we recruited 30 participants who took photos representing their experience of inequality and discussed them during semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified in this study: (1) inequalities are unjust, multilayered and intertwined with mental health. Accounts demonstrated a deep understanding of inequalities and their link to mental health outcomes, describing inequalities as 'suffering' and 'not good for anyone'. Financial, housing, immigration and healthcare problems exacerbated poor mental health, with racism, gender-based violence and job loss also contributing factors for both poor mental health and experiences of inequality; (2) inequalities exclude and have far-reaching mental health consequences, impacting personal sense of belonging and perceived societal value and (3) moving forwards-addressing long-standing inequality and poor public mental health necessitated coping and resilience strategies that are often unacknowledged and undervalued by support systems. CONCLUSION: Lived experience expertise was central in this study, creating an innovative methodological approach. To improve public mental health, we must address the everyday, painful structural inequalities experienced by many as commonplace and unfair. New policies and strategies must be found that involve communities, redistributing resources and power, building on a collective knowledge base, to coproduce actions combatting inequalities and improving population mental health. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was peer-led, designed and carried out by researchers who had experiences of poor mental health. Six authors of the paper worked as peer researchers on this study.

What can we learn from senescent platelets, their transcriptomes and proteomes?

Research into the natural aging process of platelets has garnered much research interest in recent years, and there have long been associations drawn between the proportion of newly formed platelets in the circulation and the risk of thrombosis. However, these observations have largely been demonstrated in patient groups in which there may be underlying systemic changes that effect platelet function. Recent advances in technology have allowed in-depth analysis of differently aged platelets isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy individuals and have demonstrated that aged platelets, often referred to as senescent platelets, undergo extensive changes in the transcriptome and proteome. Ultimately, these changes result in platelets whose functions have deteriorated such that they cannot partake in hemostatic responses to the same extent as newly formed platelets. Here, we review transcriptomic and proteomic research in platelet aging in the context of health and how this research sheds light upon alterations in platelet structure and function.

Platelets normally last within the human circulation for approximately 10 days, however there are a number of diseases in which this life span is notably reduced. People who have platelets with such reduced lifespans have higher risks of heart attacks and strokes and reduced responsiveness to standard anti-platelet drugs. Research in recent years has aimed to understand the age-related changes that occur within platelets as they circulate in the bloodstream. In this review article, the authors provide a summary of the changes that occur during the natural aging process of platelets in healthy people, highlighting reductions in the levels of RNA and proteins. Despite these general reductions in their own RNA and proteins, research has shown that as platelets circulate they take up other RNA transcripts and proteins from the bloodstream, and this too seems a hallmark of platelet aging. The authors also discuss age-related declines in various aspects of platelet function which renders them less effective participants in the formation of blood clots.

Platelet ageing: A review.

Platelet ageing is an area of research which has gained much interest in recent years. Newly formed platelets, often referred to as reticulated platelets, young platelets or immature platelets, are defined as RNA-enriched and have long been thought to be hyper-reactive. This latter view is largely rooted in associations and observations in patient groups with shortened platelet half-lives who often present with increased proportions of newly formed platelets. Evidence from such groups suggests that an increased proportion of newly formed platelets is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events and a reduced effectiveness of standard anti-platelet therapies. Whilst research has highlighted the existence of platelet subpopulations based on function, size and age within patient groups, the common intrinsic changes which occur as platelets age within the circulation are only just being explored. By understanding the changes that occur during the natural ageing processes of platelets, we may be able to identify the triggers for alterations in platelet life span and platelet reactivity. Here we review research on platelet ageing in the context of health and disease, paying particular attention to the experimental approaches taken and the robustness of conclusions that can be drawn.

Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health.

BACKGROUND: Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework. METHODS: The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic. RESULTS: We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural. CONCLUSIONS: This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research. The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health.