Off-Label Use of Sirolimus and Everolimus in a Pediatric Center: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: It has been 15 years since sirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, received Food and Drug Administration approval to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplantation, and 8 years since its analog everolimus acquired the same status. Since then, these drugs have become more and more utilized and their immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties have been tested in a great variety of clinical conditions, often achieving excellent results. Despite such positive evidence, the on-label indications for these rapalogs are still very restrictive, especially in children. AIMS: The aims of this study were to describe our center's experience with sirolimus and everolimus in managing rare pediatric conditions for which mTOR inhibitors have been reported as a therapeutic option, although without conclusive approval from regulatory agencies, and to evaluate safety and tolerability of the treatment at the prescribed doses. METHODS: All the subjects who received off-label sirolimus or everolimus at the Pediatric Department of the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo in the last 13 years were included. For each disease found in our case series, we reviewed the current scientific literature. RESULTS: Off-label treatment with rapalogs was prescribed in 16 children (11 males, 5 females, median age of 9.5 years, range 1-16 years). Seven had immunologic disorders: four autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), one multicentric Castleman disease (mCD), one activated PI3K delta kinase syndrome (APDS), and one immunodysregulation with polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked (IPEX). Eight had proliferative disorders or vascular anomalies: one cystic lymphangioma, two Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome (BRRS), one blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS), two tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), and one low-flow mixed arterial and venous malformation. One case had congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). The average dosage administered was 1 mg/m2 for sirolimus and 7 mg/m2 for everolimus. We experienced a good measurable clinical improvement in 14 patients. Nobody experienced serious adverse events (SAEs). The therapy was interrupted in two cases, for lack of efficacy and poor tolerance in one case and for occurrence of bacterial pneumonia in the other one. A review of the literature identified 101 published reports that met our inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although use of mTOR inhibitors has been considered to be complicated, our experience shows that, using low dosages, it is possible to obtain relevant clinical improvements, with a good profile of safety and tolerability.

T cells stimulated in vitro have a suppressive function but do not contain only regulatory T cells.

The generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in vitro represents an attractive possibility to set up cellular therapies that could prevent and cure autoimmune disorders. Different methods have been proposed to generate Tregs in vitro and to evaluate their phenotype and function. Moreover, the overlap between generation of activated and regulatory cells could often be underestimated. We showed that in vitro treatment of CD4+ CD25- lymphocytes with different stimuli leads to a good expression of CD25 and forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) on most cells, but to a full Treg phenotype (including CD127 negativity) in only a minor percentage of cells, ranging from 17.38% of cells treated with phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) to 50.91% of cells treated with T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation in association with transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. Some suppressive activity was demonstrated for T cells activated with all the different stimuli. However, while suppression mediated by TCR/TGF-beta treated T cells was associated with an inhibition of both interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-gamma in the co-culture supernatant, the suppression observed for PHA-activated cells occurred in the presence of large amounts of these cytokines. In conclusion, also taking into account other recent publications, caution should be taken in interpretation of data in the field of regulatory T cells.