Determinants of pain and functioning in knee osteoarthritis: a one-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: A one-year prospective analysis of determinants of pain and functioning in knee osteoarthritis. STUDY SETTING: Primary care providers in a medium-sized city. PATIENTS: A total of 111 patients aged from 35 to 75 with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (Kellgren-Lawrence 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis who participated in a randomized controlled trial. MAIN MEASURES: The outcome measures were self-reported pain and function, which were recorded at 0, 3 and 12 months. Disease-specific pain and functioning were assessed using the pain and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index. Generic physical and mental functioning were assessed using the RAND-36 subscales for function, and physical and mental component summary scores. Possible baseline predictors for these outcomes were 1) demographic, socioeconomic and disease-related variables, and 2) psychological measures of resources, distress, fear of movement and catastrophizing. RESULTS: Multivariate linear mixed model analyses revealed that normal mood at baseline measured with the Beck Anxiety Inventory predicted significantly better results in all measures of pain (WOMAC P=0.02) and function (WOMAC P=0.002, RAND-36 P=0.002) during the one-year follow-up. Psychological resource factors (pain self-efficacy P=0.012, satisfaction with life P=0.002) predicted better function (RAND-36). Pain catastrophizing predicted higher WOMAC pain levels (P=0.013), whereas fear of movement (kinesiophobia) predicted poorer functioning (WOMAC P=0.046, RAND-36 P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple psychological factors in people with knee osteoarthritis pain are associated with the development of disability and longer term worse pain.

Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioural group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a six week cognitive-behavioural group intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis pain. DESIGN: Single-blinded randomized controlled trial. STUDY SETTING: Primary care providers in a medium-sized city in Finland. PATIENTS: A total of 111 participants aged from 35 to 75 with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (Kellgren-Lawrence 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis were included. INTERVENTIONS: In the intervention group, 55 participants attended a cognitive-behavioural training programme for pain management with six weekly group sessions supervised by a psychologist and a physiotherapist. Concurrently, they and the 56 participants of the control group continued in ordinary GP care that was not altered by the study. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome on three-month and 12-month follow-up was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis index pain subscale. Secondary outcome measures included self-reports of pain and physical function, health-related quality of life, and a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires. RESULTS: Mixed model results showed no significant differences between the intervention and control group for any measures of pain or function. A significant difference between the groups was found in the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (Pr = 0.022) in favour of the control group, and in the RAND-36 emotional well-being subscale in favour of the intervention group (Pr = 0.038). Conventional group comparisons of mean follow-up values showed no significant differences in any of the outcome variables. CONCLUSION: This trial could not confirm the hypothesized advantage of a cognitive-behavioural training programme over ordinary GP care in knee osteoarthritis pain patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64794760.

Multiple psychological factors are associated with poorer functioning in a sample of community-dwelling knee osteoarthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis and imposes a heavy burden on individual welfare among elderly people. There is preliminary evidence that psychological factors play a role in functional ability and pain in knee OA patients, particularly with respect to the surgery outcome. Less is known about psychological factors among community-dwelling patients with knee OA. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine which psychological factors are associated with pain and functional ability among community-dwelling knee OA patients using a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires. METHODS: In the cross-sectional baseline setting of a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study, 111 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading of knee OA were included. They completed a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires, including measures of resources and coping, fear and catastrophizing, and distress. RESULTS: In cross-sectional comparisons, pain self-efficacy, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, and elevated anxiety were associated with pain and a poorer functional ability. In logistic regression analysis, independent association was seen between pain self-efficacy and poorer functioning. Knee OA patients also reported elevated levels of anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal that both pain self-efficacy and negatively charged emotion and expectations toward pain are important factors when dealing with knee OA patients. Failure to consider these will probably contribute to prolonged disability and further pain. The results call for the routine assessment of multiple psychological factors in knee OA.

Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is the most common type of arthritis, with pain being its most common symptom. Little is known about the psychological aspects of knee osteoarthritis pain. There is an emerging consensus among osteoarthritis specialists about the importance of addressing not only biological but also psychosocial factors in the assessment and treatment of osteoarthritis. As few studies have evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on knee osteoarthritis pain, good quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine their effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: We intend to conduct a 6-week single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Altogether, 108 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (KL 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis will be included. The clinical inclusion criteria are pain within the last year in or around the knee occurring on most days for at least one month, and knee pain of ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale in the WOMAC pain subscale for one week prior to study entry. Patients with any severe psychiatric disorder, other back or lower limb pain symptoms more aggravating than knee pain, or previous or planned lower extremity joint surgery will be excluded. The patients will be randomly assigned to a combined GP care and cognitive-behavioral intervention group (n = 54) or to a GP care control group (n = 54). The cognitive-behavioral intervention will consist of 6 weekly group sessions supervised by a psychologist and a physiotherapist experienced in the treatment of pain. The main goals of the intervention are to reduce maladaptive pain coping and to increase the self-management of pain and disability. The follow-up-points will be arranged at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure will be the WOMAC pain subscale. Secondary outcome measures will include self-reports of pain and physical function, a health related quality of life questionnaire, and various psychological questionnaires. Personnel responsible of the data analysis will be blinded. DISCUSSION: This study addresses the current topic of non-pharmacological conservative treatment of knee OA-related pain. We anticipate that these results will provide important new insights to the current care recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64794760.

The association between physicians' attitudes to psychosocial aspects of low back pain and reported clinical behaviour: A complex issue.

Background and aim Physicians' attitudes predict clinical decision making and treatment choices, but the association between attitudes and behaviour is complex. Treatment guidelines for non-specific low back pain (LBP) include recommendations of early assessment of psychosocial risk factors forchronic pain, patient education and reassurance. Implication of these principles is demanding, and many patients are not referred for appropriate treatments due to a lack of systematic screening of psychosocial risk factors for chronic pain. Even though health care providers recognise the need for psychosocial assessment in LBP, psychosocial issues are seldom raised in acute settings. The aim of this study is to evaluate how physicians' attitudes towards assessing psychological issues of LBP patients are associated with their treatment practice, and to assess if their clinical actions follow current treatment guidelines. Methods The study was amixed methods study of primary care physicians (n = 55) in Finland. Physicians' attitudes were measured with a psychological subscale of attitudes to back pain scales for musculoskeletal practitioners (ABS-mp). Treatment practice of LBP was evaluated by as king physicians to describe a typical LBP treatment process and by asking them to solve a LBP patient case. Members of the research team individually evaluated the degree to which psychosocial issues were taken into account in the treatment process and in the patient case answer. Qualitative and quantitative data were combined to examine the role of attitudes in the treatment of LBP. Results The attitudes of physicians were generally psychologically oriented. Physicians who addressed to psychosocial issues in their treatment practice were more psychologically oriented in their attitudes than physicians who did not consider psychosocial issues. Only 20% of physicians mentioned psychosocial issues as being a part of the LBP patient's typical treatment process, while 87% of physicians paid attention to psychosocial issues in the LBP patient case. On the level of the treatment process, radiological investigations were over-represented and pain assessment, patient information and reassurance infrequently performed when compared to LBP guidelines. Conclusions Although primary care physicians were generally psychosocially oriented in their attitudes on LBP, psychological issues were inconsistently brought up in their reported clinical behaviour. Physicians recognised the need to assess psychosocial factors. Those who were psychologically oriented in their attitudes were more inclined to take psychosocial issues into account. However on a process level, evaluation and treatment of LBP featured biomechanical principles. LBP guidelines were only partially followed. Implications Clinical behaviour of physicians in the treatment of LBP is complex and only partly explained by attitudes.