An autopsy study suggests that diabetic nephropathy is underdiagnosed.

The reported prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) among patients with diabetes varies widely. Most studies use the presence of microalbuminuria for clinical onset of DN in the absence of a histopathologic evaluation. In this autopsy study, we collected and analyzed data from a cohort of patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes and determined the prevalence of histologically proven DN in patients with or without clinical manifestations of renal disease. We also examined the distribution among histopathologic classes with respect to clinical parameters. Renal tissue specimens from autopsies and clinical data were collected retrospectively from 168 patients with diabetes. The histopathologic classification for DN was scored as were interstitial and vascular parameters. In this cohort, 106 of 168 patients had histopathologic changes in the kidney characteristic of DN. Twenty of the 106 histologically proven DN cases did not present with DN-associated clinical manifestations within their lifetime. Glomerular and interstitial lesions were associated with renal function but not with proteinuria. We also found that underdiagnosed DN may encompass all histopathologic classes except the sclerotic class. Thus, the prevalence of histologically proven DN was higher than previously appreciated, and we found a relatively high proportion of DN that was clinically underdiagnosed yet histologically proven, suggesting that DN lesions may develop before the onset of clinical findings.

Diabetic nephropathy in humans: pathologic diversity.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes are associated with severe complications including diabetic nephropathy. With the rapidly rising number of patients with diabetes worldwide, diabetic nephropathy is becoming one of the most common causes of renal disease. Much research effort is being put into how to identify diabetic nephropathy in patients with diabetes. A considerable number of biomarker studies were recently published on markers in plasma or urine, either with the aim to distinguish patients with or without diabetic nephropathy, or with the aim to predict renal outcome in those patients with diabetic nephropathy. We review the most recent findings on this subject and discuss the lack of histologically proven diabetic nephropathy in the majority of these studies. RECENT FINDINGS: Most conspicuous in the field of diabetic nephropathy was the recent identification of a number of biomarkers used either in the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy or in the evaluation of therapies meant to prevent, slow down, or reverse the processes causing diabetic nephropathy. For the histopathology of diabetic nephropathy, a new classification system was launched in 2010, which will be discussed together with future perspectives. SUMMARY: Combining histopathological grading of and biomarkers for diabetic nephropathy will further our understanding of this complex disease manifestation.