Frontoinsular Network Markers of Current and Future Adolescent Mood Health.

BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a developmental period in which depression and related mood syndromes often emerge, but few objective markers exist to guide diagnosis or predict symptoms. One potential mood marker is the functioning of frontoinsular networks, which undergo substantial development in adolescence and have been implicated in adult depression. To test this hypothesis, we used task-based neuroimaging to evaluate whether frontoinsular network dysfunction was linked to current and prospective mood health in adolescents. METHODS: Adolescents (n = 40, 13-19 years of age) reporting varying levels of depressive symptom severity performed an emotional working memory task with neuroimaging. Next, teens completed a 2-week follow-up consisting of a daily diary report of negative affect and final report of depressive symptoms (n = 28 adherent). Analyses tested associations between task-related functional connectivity in frontoinsular networks and baseline or prospective measures of mood health over 2-week follow-up. RESULTS: Frontoinsular task response was associated with higher current depression severity (p = .049, ηp2 = .12), increases in future depression severity (p = .018, ηp2 = .23), and more intense and labile negative affect in daily life (ps = .015 to .040, ηp2 = .22 to .30). In particular, hypoconnectivity between insula and lateral prefrontal regions of the frontoparietal network was related to both baseline and prospective mood health, and hyperconnectivity between insula and midline or temporal regions of the default network was related to prospective mood health. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that frontoinsular imbalances are related to both current depression and changes in mood health in the near future and suggest that frontoinsular markers may hold promise as translational tools for risk prediction.

Abnormal frontoinsular-default network dynamics in adolescent depression and rumination: a preliminary resting-state co-activation pattern analysis.

Clinical depression commonly emerges in adolescence, which is also a time of developing cognitive ability and related large-scale functional brain networks implicated in depression. In depressed adults, abnormalities in the dynamic functioning of frontoinsular networks, in particular, have been observed and linked to negative rumination. Thus, network dynamics may provide new insight into teen pathophysiology. Here, adolescents (n = 45, ages 13-19) with varying severity of depressive symptoms completed a resting-state functional MRI scan. Functional networks were evaluated using co-activation pattern analysis to identify whole-brain states of spatial co-activation that recurred across participants and time. Measures included: dwell time (proportion of scan spent in that network state), persistence (volume-to-volume maintenance of a network state), and transitions (frequency of moving from state A to state B). Analyses tested associations between depression or trait rumination and dynamics of network states involving frontoinsular and default network systems. Results indicated that adolescents showing increased dwell time in, and persistence of, a frontoinsular-default network state involving insula, dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior regions of default network, reported more severe symptoms of depression. Further, adolescents who transitioned more frequently between the frontoinsular-default state and a prototypical default network state reported higher depression. Increased dominance and transition frequency of frontoinsular-default network states were also associated with higher rumination, and rumination mediated the associations between network dynamics and depression. Findings support a model in which abnormal frontoinsular dynamics confer vulnerability to maladaptive introspection, which in turn contributes to symptoms of adolescent depression.

Psychosocial factors and quality of life in children and adolescents with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Few data exist on the quality of life in children and adolescents with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The objective of this study was to determine whether anxiety, depression, family functioning, and quality of life are related to cardiac illness severity in pediatric patients with ICDs. The subjects were 20 patients (mean age 14.8 years; median 15.1, range 9 to 19) who had an ICD implantation a mean 1.4 years (median 0.1, range 0 to 6) before the study. The patients completed the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale, Reynold's Adolescent/Child Depression Scales, Child Health Questionnaire-87, and the Worries About ICDs Scale. The parents completed the Impact-on-Family Scale and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-50). The Defibrillator Severity Index assessed cardiac severity. The rates of anxiety or depression were not increased, although the patients appeared to experience a greater need for social acceptance. Parent ratings of overall family functioning did not differ significantly from normative sample means. Parents reported significantly lower CHQ-50 summary physical functioning scores than scores of a normative United States sample, whereas there was no significant difference for the CHQ-50 summary psychosocial score. Caregivers perceived that their children had a lower quality of life when asked about their child's physical functioning, functioning in the social-physical role, and general health perceptions. Despite the overall nonsignificance of the psychosocial summary score, the social emotional/behavioral role, and the emotional impact their child's health had on themselves, subscales were all significantly lower than the normative sample. Cardiac illness severity was not significantly associated with anxiety, depression, quality of life, or family functioning. However, significant associations were found among measures of anxiety, depression, family functioning, and quality of life. Overall, most pediatric patients with ICDs appear to be a resilient group of youngsters. Their quality of life was more strongly correlated with their feelings of anxiety and depression as well as their family functioning than to the severity of their cardiac illness.