Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 19(2): e283-e296, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737173

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Angiogenesis and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling are potential therapeutic targets in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that targeting these critical pathways would prolong progression-free survival with first-line therapy for metastatic TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab, followed by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib, for patients with metastatic TNBC. During induction, the patients received nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (days 1, 8, and 15) and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (days 1 and 15) every 28 days for 6 cycles. Patients free of progression at 24 weeks received maintenance therapy with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and oral erlotinib 150 mg/d until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were best overall response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events. We explored the measurement of circulating tumor cells as a prognostic marker. RESULTS: A total of 55 evaluable patients were enrolled. The median PFS and OS for the cohort was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-11.1) and 18.1 months (95% confidence interval, 15.6-21.7), respectively. Of the 53 patients with measurable disease, 39 (74%) had experienced a partial response and 10 (19%) had stable disease using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. The most common toxicities were uncomplicated neutropenia, fatigue, and neuropathy. Decreased circulating tumor cells from baseline to the first assessment correlated with longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab, followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib, resulted in PFS similar to that of other trials. Most patients experienced a partial response (74%). Most patients received maintenance therapy (55%), providing a break from cytotoxic chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Albuminas/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Erlotinib/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albuminas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Células Endoteliais/patologia , Cloridrato de Erlotinib/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/sangue , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Moduladores de Tubulina/administração & dosagem , Moduladores de Tubulina/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA