Disparities Associated with Decision to Undergo Oncologic Surgery: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Underrepresented minority patients with surgical malignancies experience disparities in outcomes. The impact of provider-based factors, including communication, trust, and cultural competency, on outcomes is not well understood. This study examines modifiable provider-based barriers to care experienced by patients with surgical malignancies. METHODS: A parallel, prospective, mixed-methods study enrolled patients with lung or gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing surgical consultation. Surveys assessed patients' social needs and patient-physician relationship. Semi-structured interviews ascertained patient experiences and were iteratively analyzed, identifying key themes. RESULTS: The cohort included 24 patients (age 62 years; 63% White and 38% Black/African American). The most common cancers were lung (n = 18, 75%) and gastroesophageal (n = 3, 13%). Survey results indicated that food insecurity (n = 5, 21%), lack of reliable transportation (n = 4, 17%), and housing instability (n = 2, 8%) were common. Lack of trust in their physician (n = 3, 13%) and their physician's treatment recommendation (n = 3, 13%) were identified. Patients reported a lack of empathy (n = 3, 13%), lack of cultural competence (n = 3, 13%), and inadequate communication (n = 2, 8%) from physicians. Qualitative analysis identified five major themes regarding the decision to undergo surgery: communication, trust, health literacy, patient fears, and decision-making strategies. Five patients (21%) declined the recommended surgery and were more likely Black (100% vs. 21%), lower income (100% vs. 16%), and reported poor patient-physician relationship (40% vs. 5%; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with declining recommended cancer surgery were underrepresented minority race and poor patient-physician relationships. Interventions are needed to improve these barriers to care and racial disparities.

Routine chest radiography after thoracostomy tube removal and during postoperative follow-up is not necessary after lung resection.

OBJECTIVES: The need for routine chest radiography following chest tube removal after elective pulmonary resection may be unnecessary in most patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of eliminating routine chest radiography in these patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective pulmonary resection, excluding pneumonectomy, for benign or malignant indications between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. Patients with in-hospital mortality or without routine follow-up were excluded. During this interval, our practice transitioned from ordering routine chest radiography after chest tube removal and at the first postoperative clinic visit to obtaining imaging based on symptomatology. The primary outcome was changes in management from results of chest radiography obtained routinely versus for symptoms. Characteristics and outcomes were compared using the Student t test and chi-square analyses. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients met inclusion criteria. Ninety-three patients underwent a routine same-day post-pull chest radiography, and 229 patients did not. Thirty-three patients (14.4%) in the nonroutine chest radiography cohort received imaging for symptoms, in whom 8 (24.2%) resulted in management changes. Only 3.2% of routine post-pull chest radiography resulted in management changes versus 3.5% of unplanned chest radiography with no adverse outcomes (P = .905). At outpatient postoperative follow-up, 146 patients received routine chest radiography; none resulted in a change in management. Of the 176 patients who did not have planned chest radiography at follow-up, 12 (6.8%) underwent chest radiography for symptoms. Two of these patients required readmission and chest tube reinsertion. CONCLUSIONS: Reserving imaging for patients with symptoms after chest tube removal and follow-up after elective lung resections resulted in a higher percentage of meaningful changes in clinical management.

Feeding Jejunostomy Tube in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy: Utilization and Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Feeding jejunostomy (JT) tubes are often utilized as an adjunct to optimize nutrition for successful esophagectomy; however, their utility has come into question. The aim of this study was to evaluate utilization and outcomes associated with JTs in a nationwide cohort of patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: The NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent elective esophagectomy. JT utilization was assessed between 2010 and 2019. Post-operative outcomes were compared between those with and without a JT on patients with esophagectomy-specific outcomes (2016-2019), with results validated using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis based on key clinicopathologic factors, including tumor stage. RESULTS: Of the 10,117 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy over the past decade, 53.0% had a JT placed concurrently and 47.0% did not. Utilization of JTs decreased over time, accounting for 60.0% of cases in 2010 compared to 41.7% in 2019 (m = - 2.14 95%CI: [- 1.49]-[- 2.80], p < 0.01). Patients who underwent JT had more composite wound complications (17.0% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of all-cause morbidity (40.4% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.01). Following PSM, 1007 pairs were identified. Analysis of perioperative outcomes demonstrated a higher rate of superficial skin infections (6.1% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.01) in the JT group. However, length of stay, reoperation, readmission, anastomotic leak, composite wound complications, all-cause morbidity, and mortality rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing elective esophagectomy, feeding jejunostomy tubes were utilized less frequently over the past decade. Similar perioperative outcomes among matched patients support the safety of esophagectomy without an adjunct feeding jejunostomy tube.

Impact of Environmental Exposures on Lung Cancer in Patients Who Never Smoked.

BACKGROUND: Despite the rising incidence of lung cancer in patients who never smoked, environmental risk factors such as ambient air pollution in this group are poorly described. Our objective was to identify the relationship of environmental exposures with lung cancer in patients who never smoked. METHODS: A prospectively collected database was reviewed for all patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who underwent resection from 2006 to 2021. Environmental exposures were estimated using the geocoded home address of patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of clinical and environmental variables with smoking status. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess survival. RESULTS: A total of 665 patients underwent resection for NSCLC, of which 67 (10.1%) were patients who never smoked and 598 (89.9%) were current/former smokers. Patients who never smoked were more likely of white race (p = 0.001) and had well-differentiated tumors with carcinoid or adenocarcinoma histology (p < 0.001). Environmental exposures were similar between groups, but patients who never smoked had less community material deprivation (p = 0.002) measured by household income, education, health insurance, and vacancies. They had improved overall survival (p = 0.012) but equivalent cancer recurrence (p = 0.818) as those who smoked. In univariable Cox analyses, fine particulate matter (HR: 1.447 [95% CI 1.197-1.750], p < 0.001), distance to nearest major roadway (HR: 1.067 [1.024-1.111], p = 0.002), and greenspace (HR: 0.253 [0.087-0.737], p = 0.012) were associated with overall survival in patients who never smoked. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer patients who never smoked have unique clinical and pathologic characteristics, including higher socioeconomic status. Interventions to reduce environmental exposures may improve lung cancer survival in this population.

A decade of surgical outcomes in a structured lung cancer screening program.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer screening can decrease mortality. The majority of screen-detected cancers are early stage and undergo surgical resection. However, there are little data regarding the outcomes of surgical treatment outside of clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of curative resection for screen-detected lung cancers with nonscreened, incidentally detected cancers at an institution with a structured screening program. METHODS: Patients undergoing lung cancer curative resection from January 2012 to June 2021 were identified from a prospective database. Baseline patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and outcomes were compared between cancer detected from screening and cancer detected incidentally. RESULTS: There were 199 patients in the incidental group and 82 patients in the screened group. Mean follow-up was 33.3 ± 25 months. The screened group had more African Americans (P = .04), a higher incidence of emphysema (P = .02), less prior cancers (P < .01), and more pack-years smoked (P < .01). The screened group had a smaller size (1.74 vs 2.31 cm, P < .01); however, pathologic stage was similar, with the majority being stage I. Postoperative morbidity, 30-day mortality, and overall and recurrence-free survival were similar between groups. Only 48.7% of the incidental group met current US Preventative Services Task Force screening criteria (age 50-80 years, ≥20 pack-year smoking history). CONCLUSIONS: Screen-detected lung cancers have excellent postoperative and long-term outcomes with curative resection, similar to incidentally detected cancers. A large portion of incidentally detected lung cancers do not meet current screening guidelines, which is an opportunity for further refinement of eligibility.

Lung cancer screening utilization rate varies based on patient, provider, and hospital factors.

OBJECTIVE: Low-dose computed tomography has been proven to reduce mortality, yet utilization remains low. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that impact the utilization of lung cancer screening. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institution's primary care network from November 2012 to June 2022 to identify patients who were eligible for lung cancer screening. Eligible patients were 55 to 80 years of age and current or former smokers with at least a 30 pack-year history. Analyses were performed on the screened populations and patients who met eligibility criteria but were not screened. RESULTS: A total of 35,279 patients in our primary care network were current/former smokers aged 55 to 80 years. A total of 6731 patients (19%) had a 30 pack-year or more cigarette history, and 11,602 patients (33%) had an unknown pack-year history. A total of 1218 patients received low-dose computed tomography. The utilization rate of low-dose computed tomography was 18%. The utilization rate was significantly lower (9%) if patients with unknown pack-year history were included (P < .001). The utilization rates between primary care clinic locations were significantly different (range, 18% vs 41%, P < .05). Utilization of low-dose computed tomography on multivariate analysis was associated with Black race, former smoker, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchitis, family history of lung cancer, and number of primary care visits (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer screening utilization rates are low and vary significantly on the basis of patient comorbidities, family history of lung cancer, primary care clinic location, and accurate documentation of pack-year cigarette history. The development of programs to address patient, provider, and hospital-level factors is needed to ensure appropriate lung cancer screening.

Cardiac Surgery Exposure in General Surgery Residency-A Survey of General Surgery Residency Program Directors.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding how much exposure general surgery residents have to cardiac surgery, despite cardiothoracic (CT) surgery being an offered postresidency fellowship and career. Exposure to a subspecialty is important in shaping residents' interests and career decisions. METHODS: A survey was sent to all general surgery program directors via the Association of Program Directors in Surgery examining cardiac surgery exposure during training. The survey examined the presence of operative rotations in cardiac surgery and cardiac critical care, portions of cases residents were permitted to perform, cardiac surgery mentorship and education, and perceived biases in applying to cardiac surgery. Differences between programs with and without cardiothoracic training programs were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 44% (102/230) of program directors responded to the survey. Residents were involved in operative cardiac and cardiac ICU rotations in 61 programs (69.8%) and 39 programs (38.2%), respectively. Twenty programs (19.6%) had a dedicated cardiothoracic surgery training program and these programs had significantly more graduates who aspired to be cardiac surgeons (M = 2.75, SD = 2.47) compared to hospitals with no CT programs (M = 1.43, SD = 1.41; p = 0.031). 35.3% of program directors reported resident concern over family life. CONCLUSIONS: There is a notable heterogeneity in general surgery resident exposure to cardiac surgery, cardiac ICU, and cardiac surgery mentorship. Increased exposure, mentorship and mitigating resident concern over the impact of social factors on cardiac surgical careers should be key areas of focus to ensure continued encouragement of future trainees and surgeons.

The Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Persistent Opioid Use Following Pulmonary Resection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been associated with improved perioperative outcomes after thoracic surgery; however, the impact on long-term opioid use remains unknown. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of ERAS on long-term opioid use. METHODS: Patients who underwent pulmonary resection were identified from a prospectively maintained database and linked to the regional prescription drug monitoring program. Outcomes were compared between pre-ERAS (February 2016 to November 2018) and ERAS (December 2018 to June 2020) cohorts. Our ERAS protocol included regional anesthetic, multimodal pain control, and protocolized rehabilitation. RESULTS: We analyzed 240 pulmonary resections, 64.6% (n = 155) in the pre-ERAS era and 35.4% (n = 85) in the ERAS era. Baseline characteristics were similar; however, more patients in the ERAS cohort underwent minimally invasive surgery (67.7% vs 87.9%; P = .002). Median length of stay was reduced (5 days vs 4 days; P = .03) upon implementation of ERAS, with no change in perioperative complications or readmission rate. On multivariate analysis, ERAS was associated with decreased total inpatient morphine milligram equivalent and discharge morphine milligram equivalent. However, both long-term opioid use up to 1 year postoperatively and new persistent opioid use remained similar despite implementation of ERAS. On multivariate analysis, implementation of ERAS was not associated with a reduction in opioid use 14 to 90 days postoperatively or persistent opioid use 90 to 180 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite short-term opioid reduction, long-term opioid use persisted after implementation of ERAS. Additional strategies to monitor for and avoid opioid dependence are urgently needed to prevent chronic opioid use after pulmonary resection.

Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in clinical trials has demonstrated improved outcomes compared to open esophagectomy (OE). However, outcomes after national implementation remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes after RAMIE. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective esophagectomy between 2016 and 2020 were identified from the American College of Surgeons-- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophageal targeted participant user files and categorized by operative approach, with patients who underwent hybrid procedures excluded. Outcomes were compared between OE and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)/RAMIE, with subset analyses by minimally invasive operative approach. Primary outcomes included pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak requiring reintervention, all-cause morbidity, and 30-d mortality. RESULTS: In total 2786 patients were included, of which 58.3% underwent OE, 33.2% underwent MIE, and 8.4% underwent RAMIE. In the entire cohort, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was the most common technique (64.6%), followed by transhiatal (22.0%), and a McKeown technique (13.4%). Comparing OE and MIE/RAMIE, pulmonary complications (21.5% versus 16.1%, P < 0.01) and all-cause morbidity (40.9% versus 32.3%, P < 0.01) were both reduced in the MIE/RAMIE group. When directly comparing MIE to RAMIE, there was no difference in the rate of pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, all-cause morbidity, and mortality. However, RAMIE was associated with decreased all-cause morbidity compared to OE (40.9% versus 33.3%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: RAMIE was associated with decreased morbidity compared to OE, with similar outcomes to MIE. The national adoption of RAMIE in this select cohort appears safe.

General Surgery Residency Virtual Recruitment During the Pandemic: An Analysis of Applicant Surveys.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic forced a sudden change from in-person to virtual interviews for the general surgery residency match. General surgery programs and applicants adopted multiple strategies to best mimic in-person recruitment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate applicant opinions of the virtual recruitment format. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postinterview survey responses for applicants interviewing at a single general surgery residency program in the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 cycles were evaluated. All interviewed applicants were sent an anonymous survey assessing the virtual interview structure, their impression of the program, and their opinions on recruitment in the future. RESULTS: The response rate was 31.2% (n = 60). Most (88.4%) respondents reported a more favorable view of the program after a virtual interview. Factors that were most likely to create a favorable impression were residents (89.6%) and culture (81.0%). 50.8% of applicants favored virtual-only interviews. The majority of applicants (60.3%), however, preferred the virtual interview remain a component of the application process, 34.4% recommended that virtual interviews be used as an initial screen before in-person invites, while 19.0% suggested applicants should interview in-person or virtually without penalty. 62.1% favored capping the number of interviews offered by programs and accepted by applicants. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual interview format for general surgery residency allows applicants to effectively evaluate a residency program. Applicants are in favor of a combination of virtual and in-person interviews in the future. Innovation in the recruitment process, including limiting the number of applications and incorporating virtual events, is supported by applicants.

Experience of surgical subspecialty residents on general surgery rotations.

BACKGROUND: Surgical subspecialty residents complete 5-6 years of training which includes general surgery rotations. A lack of data exists evaluating these rotations. This study aims to identify discrepancies in subspecialty training and improve the quality of surgical education. METHODS: Case logs for surgical subspecialty residents and general surgery residents at our institution were analyzed and queried for cases performed on general surgery rotations. A survey was distributed to subspecialty residents regarding their perceptions of these rotations. RESULTS: 50 residents were included in the study and the majority were male (n = 27, 54%). Subspecialty residents perform fewer cases per month compared to general surgery residents (13 vs 21, p < 0.001). 75% of subspecialty residents were satisfied with their experience on general surgery rotations. CONCLUSIONS: Subspecialty residents perform fewer operations on general surgery rotations. Despite this, most are satisfied with off-service rotations and believe they are an important part of their education.

Mediastinal thymic cysts: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Mediastinal thymic cysts are a relatively rare pathology. With the expansion of eligible individuals screened with cross-sectional imaging for lung cancer, it is likely that there will be an increase in the number of individuals presenting with these cysts. Understanding this rare pathology will become more important when this incidental pathology is encountered. Methods: Search of PubMed was undertaken using keywords "mediastinal", "mediastinum", "thymic", "thymus", "cyst". Relevant literature was reviewed and selected for this comprehensive narrative review, including case reports, case series, and retrospective reviews. Key Content and Findings: Thymic cysts in the mediastinum can be classified into two broad categories, congenital and inflammatory. Accurate diagnosis by imaging is challenging and the majority of patients are asymptomatic. Literature suggests that the majority of cysts are benign, however an unknown percentage may harbor neoplastic processes and over time can cause significant compressive symptoms. Definitive treatment and diagnosis is surgical, with overall excellent outcomes. The decision to pursue surgical treatment versus surveillance requires a shared decision making approach with patients. Conclusions: Given the scarcity of available high quality evidence regarding the management of mediastinal thymic cysts, this review provides practitioners a broad knowledge base to guide patients to make informed decisions.

The volume-outcomes relationship in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT) has become an effective mechanism for expanding the donor pool and decreasing waitlist mortality. However, it is unclear if low-volume DCD centers can achieve comparable outcomes to high-volume centers. METHODS: From 2011 to 2019 utilizing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, liver transplant centers were categorized into tertiles based on their annual volume of DCD LTs. Donor selection, recipient selection, and survival outcomes were compared between very-low volume (VLV, n = 1-2 DCD LTs per year), low-volume (LV, n = 3-5), and high-volume (HV, n > 5) centers. RESULTS: One hundred and ten centers performed 3273 DCD LTs. VLV-centers performed 339 (10.4%), LV-centers performed 627 (19.2%), and HV-centers performed 2307 (70.4%) LTs. 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year patient and graft survival were significantly increased at HV-centers (all P < .05). Recipients at HV-centers had shorter waitlist durations (P < .01) and shorter hospital lengths of stay (P < .01). On multivariable regression, undergoing DCD LT at a VLV-center or LV-center was associated with increased 1-year patient mortality (VLV-OR:1.73, 1.12-2.69) (LV-OR: 1.42, 1.01-2.00) and 1-year graft failure (VLV-OR: 1.79, 1.24-2.58) (LV-OR: 1.28, .95-1.72). DISCUSSION: Increased annual DCD liver transplant volume is associated with improved patient and graft survival.

Impact of Integrated Thoracic Residency on General Surgery Residents' Thoracic Operative Volume.

BACKGROUND: Integrated thoracic surgery (I-6) programs have become popular over traditional general surgery (GS) pathways since their inception in 2007. However the effect of I-6 programs on GS resident training remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of I-6 programs on the thoracic operative experience of co-located GS residents. METHODS: Thoracic surgery cases recorded by residents in GS programs co-located with I-6 programs until 2019 were analyzed. Cases were reviewed 5 years before (TSR-5) through 5 years after (TSR-5) the matriculation of the first thoracic resident in the co-located I-6 program. To contextualize the overall trends in the field Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education GS resident case logs from 1990 to 2018 were analyzed and total thoracic surgery cases recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with linear regression. RESULTS: Residents in 19 GS programs with co-located I-6 programs showed an increase in total thoracic cases from 3710 to 4451 (Δ/year of +85.05 cases a year; P = .03) balanced by an increase in GS residents from 107 to 126 (Δ/year of +1.45; P = .01) with no significant overall change in the median thoracic operative case volume (31.00 at both thoracic residency before and after 5 years). Nationally from 1990 to 2018 there was no change in the total thoracic operative experience for GS graduates. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of I-6 programs did not negatively impact thoracic operative experience for residents in co-located GS programs. Adequate training of both I-6 and GS residents at the same institution is feasible.

A Structured Program Maximizes Benefit of Lung Cancer Screening in an Area of Endemic Histoplasmosis.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography has demonstrated at least a 20% decrease in lung cancer-specific mortality, but it has the potential harm of unnecessary invasive procedures performed because of false-positive results. This study reports the outcomes of a structured multidisciplinary lung cancer screening program in an area of endemic histoplasmosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing lung cancer screening from December 2012 to March 2019 was conducted. Findings suggestive of lung cancer were presented to a multidisciplinary thoracic tumor board. Patients were assigned to interval imaging follow-up, additional diagnostic imaging, or referral for an invasive procedure. Invasive procedures were then compared between benign and malignant diseases. RESULTS: A total of 4087 scans were performed on 2129 patients; 372 (9.1%) were suspicious and were presented to a multidisciplinary thoracic tumor board. Ultimately, 108 procedures were performed: 55 bronchoscopies, 7 percutaneous biopsies, and 46 operations. A total of 25 patients (1.2%) underwent bronchoscopy resulting in benign pathologic findings, significantly associated with an indication of an endobronchial lesion (P = .01). All percutaneous biopsy specimens revealed malignancy. Five patients (0.2%) who underwent resection had benign disease. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 67 patients (3.1% of the entire cohort), 46 of whom had stage I or II disease. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer screening in a structured, multidisciplinary program successfully identifies patients with early-stage lung cancer with limited unnecessary surgical interventions. Patients with isolated endobronchial lesions should undergo short interval imaging follow-up to avoid bronchoscopy for benign disease. Future studies to minimize unnecessary procedures could incorporate biomarkers and advanced imaging analysis into risk assessment models.