Patient- and Procedure-Specific Variables Associated With Removal or Revision of Radial Head Arthroplasty.

Introduction The purpose of this retrospective review was to identify risk factors associated with removal or revision following radial head arthroplasty. Methods Patients undergoing primary radial head arthroplasty between 2009 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were identified. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to analyze the characteristics of patients requiring implant removal or revision and multivariable analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios. Results There were 312 patients included in the final cohort with a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Thirty-five patients (11.2%) underwent prosthesis removal or revision. There was an increased percentage of implants removed or revised in patients under age 40, with surgery performed for chronic indications compared to acute trauma, and with the use of press-fit stems compared to polished. Discussion It appears younger patient age, chronic surgical indications, and certain aspects of prosthesis design may influence rates of removal or revision.

Distal scaphoid resection for degenerative arthritis secondary to scaphoid nonunion: a 20-year experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term results of distal scaphoid excision for degenerative arthritis secondary to scaphoid nonunion and compare them with our original results published in 1999. METHODS: Nineteen patients who were treated by distal scaphoid resection arthroplasty from 1987 through 2010 were included. The mean follow-up was 15 years (range, 10-25 y) vs 4 years in the previous study. Clinical evaluation included measurement of the visual analog pain scale, wrist range of motion, and grip strength. Radiographs were taken at follow-up to assess for signs of arthritis and wrist collapse. RESULTS: The outcomes of this procedure include increased grip strength and total arc of motion, a small decrease in revised carpal height ratio, and a small increase in radiolunate angle. Two patients failed distal scaphoid resection arthroplasty necessitating proximal row carpectomy (1) and wrist arthrodesis (1) for recalcitrant pain. More than half of the remaining patients developed midcarpal arthritis on radiographs that was asymptomatic. No patients developed radiolunate arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that distal scaphoid resection arthroplasty produced favorable, long-term clinical results and did not result in noteworthy wrist collapse. Midcarpal arthritis, which may develop after the procedure, did not cause appreciable deterioration in patient outcomes. This procedure also did not eliminate the option of using additional, more conventional reconstructive procedures if needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Management of nonunion following surgical management of scaphoid fractures: current concepts.

Management of scaphoid nonunion after failed surgery for acute scaphoid fracture presents a unique treatment challenge. Prior surgery complicates patient evaluation and increases the technical difficulty of future procedures. Healing of nonunion is crucial to prevent carpal collapse and progressive arthritis. A thorough workup is required to identify technical factors or treatment decisions that may have resulted in a poor outcome after initial fixation attempts. CT is particularly useful for characterizing nonunion and planning revision surgery. Several studies have described the use of bone grafts and fixation devices for scaphoid nonunion repair, including nonvascularized and vascularized bone grafts, screws, pins, and plates. Reliable rates of union have been achieved using nonvascularized bone graft supplemented with screw or wire fixation, particularly in the absence of osteonecrosis. Although vascularized grafts are more technically challenging, they improve the odds of union in the setting of osteonecrosis.

The association of hemoglobin A1c with the prevalence of stenosing flexor tenosynovitis.

PURPOSE: Diabetic patients are susceptible to stenosing flexor tenosynovitis (FTS) and may have a diminished response to treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are associated with the development of FTS. METHODS: A review of our diabetic registry identified a cohort of patients with diabetes mellitus. We stratified this cohort to those with and without a diagnosis of FTS during 2008 based on International Classification of Diseases-9 coding (727.00-727.05J). We reviewed charts to confirm the diagnosis. For patients diagnosed with FTS, we used the HbA1c measurement made closest to the date of diagnosis for analysis. We assessed patients without FTS using an average of HbA1c measurements during the same time period and performed subgroup analysis based on specified HbA1c levels (group A, HbA1c level < 7.0%; group B, HbA1c 7.0% to 7.9%; group C, HbA1c 8.0% to 8.9%; group D, HbA1c ≥ 9.0%). Statistical testing consisted of chi-square analysis, odds ratios, and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 259,927 patients in 2008 identified with diabetes mellitus, 3,952 of whom were diagnosed with FTS. The period prevalence of FTS in this diabetic population was 1.5%. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that HbA1c greater than 7% was an independent risk factor for FTS (odds ratio/confidence interval: group B, 1.31/1.20-1.42; group C, 1.35/1.21-1.51; group D, 1.23/1.10-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FTS in this diabetic population was considerably lower than expected and may represent a more accurate assessment given the power of this population-based study. In addition, the development of FTS appears to be associated with higher HbA1c levels. Although further study is necessary, this association may be relevant when evaluating and treating diabetic patients with trigger finger.

Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty for wrist arthritis: rationale and early results.

Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty is a novel motion-preserving treatment for radiocarpal arthritis and is an alternative to current procedures that provide pain relief at the expense of wrist biomechanics and natural motion. It is indicated primarily in active patients with a well-preserved distal row and debilitating arthritic symptoms. By resurfacing the proximal carpal row, midcarpal arthroplasty relieves pain while preserving the midcarpal articulation and the anatomic center of wrist rotation. This technique has theoretical advantages when compared with current treatment options (i.e., arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty) since it provides coupled wrist motion, preserves radial length, is technically simple, and avoids the inherent risks of nonunion and distal component failure. The KinematX midcarpal hemiarthroplasty has an anatomic design and does not disrupt the integrity of the wrist ligaments. We have implanted this prosthesis in nine patients with promising early results. The indications for surgery were as follows: scapholunate advanced collapse wrist (three), posttraumatic osteoarthritis (three), inflammatory arthritis (two), and Keinböck disease (one). Prospective data has been collected and the results are preliminary given the infancy of the procedure. The mean follow-up was 30.9 weeks (range: 16 to 56 weeks). The mean Mayo wrist score increased from 31.9 preoperatively to 58.8 (p < 0.05) and the mean DASH score improved significantly from 47.8 preoperatively to 28.7 (p < 0.05). There was a trend toward increased motion but statistical significance was not reached. Two patients required manipulation for wrist stiffness. There was no evidence of prosthetic loosening or capitolunate narrowing. The procedure is simple (average surgical time was 49 minutes) and maintains coupled wrist motion through preservation of the midcarpal articulation. The preliminary data show that it appears safe but considerably longer follow-up is required before conclusions can be drawn as to its durability, reliability, and overall success. The level of evidence for this study is therapeutic level IV (case series).

Complications and outcome of four-corner arthrodesis: circular plate fixation versus traditional techniques.

PURPOSE: To review the clinical and radiographic results of scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis using a circular plate and screws compared with traditional fusion techniques (wires, staples, screws). METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with four-corner arthrodesis (plate fixation, n = 27; traditional fixation, n = 31) were evaluated for radiographic and clinical success using wrist radiographs and functional assays. Patients were subjectively surveyed using the standardized Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and classification scales for pain and satisfaction. Objective measurements included grip-strength and range-of-motion measurements. RESULTS: Radiographic analysis showed 26% nonunion with loose hardware in the plate group compared with 3% in the traditional group and 22% hardware impingement in the plate group compared with 3% in the traditional group. Clinical evaluation yielded a mean grip strength of 31 kg (70% of opposite side) for plate fixation and 33 kg (79% of opposite side) for traditional fixation. The mean flexion-extension arc was 48% and 50% of the opposite wrist for plate and traditional patients, respectively. The mean adjusted Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were 27 out of 100 for plate patients and 8 out of 100 for traditional patients. Pain classification scores showed that only 2 patients in the plate group were pain free whereas there were 8 patients in the traditional group who were pain free. Overall patient satisfaction was 60% for the plate group whereas the traditional patient group reported 100% satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major complications (nonunion or impingement) was much greater with circular plate fixation (48%) versus traditional fixation techniques (6%). With the plate procedure the grip strength and arc of motion decreased approximately 30% and 52%, respectively, compared with decreases of 21% and 50%, respectively, for traditional fusion methods. Additionally, subjective patient dissatisfaction was 40% in the plate group compared with 0% in the traditional group. We postulate that the increased complication and dissatisfaction rates associated with plate fixation may be attributable to possible biomechanical imperfections or increased technical demands with this fusion system.