Weight Loss through Lifestyle Intervention Improves Mobility in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The high prevalence of overweight or obesity in older adults is a public health concern because obesity affects health, including the risk of mobility disability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Mobility and Vitality Lifestyle Program, delivered by community health workers (CHWs), enrolled 303 community-dwelling adults to assess the impact of a 32-session behavioral weight management intervention. Participants completed the program at 26 sites led by 22 CHWs. Participation was limited to people aged 60-75 who had a body mass index (BMI) of 27-45 kg/m2. The primary outcome was the performance on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) over 12 months. RESULTS: Participants were aged 67.7 (SD 4.1) and mostly female (87%); 22.7% were racial minorities. The mean (SD) BMI at baseline was 34.7 (4.7). Participants attended a median of 24 of 32 sessions; 240 (80.3%) completed the 9- or 13-month outcome assessment. Median weight loss in the sample was 5% of baseline body weight. SPPB total scores improved by +0.31 units (p < .006), gait speed by +0.04 m/s (p < .0001), and time to complete chair stands by -0.95 s (p < .0001). Weight loss of at least 5% was associated with a gain of +0.73 in SPPB scores. Increases in activity (by self-report or device) were not independently associated with SPPB outcomes but did reduce the effect of weight loss. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Promoting weight management in a community group setting may be an effective strategy for reducing the risk of disability in older adults.

Mobility and Vitality Lifestyle Program (MOVE UP): A Community Health Worker Intervention for Older Adults With Obesity to Improve Weight, Health, and Physical Function.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obesity rates in adults ≥65 years have increased more than other age groups in the last decade, elevating risk for chronic disease and poor physical function, particularly in underserved racial and ethnic minorities. Effective, sustainable lifestyle interventions are needed to help community-based older adults prevent or delay mobility disability. Design, baseline recruitment, and implementation features of the Mobility and Vitality Lifestyle Program (MOVE UP) study are reported. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MOVE UP aimed to recruit 26 intervention sites in underserved areas around Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and train a similar number of community health workers to deliver a manualized intervention to groups of approximately 12 participants in each location. We adapted a 13-month healthy aging/weight management intervention aligned with several evidence-based lifestyle modification programs. A nonrandomized, pre-post design was used to measure intervention impact on physical function performance, the primary study endpoint. Secondary outcomes included weight, self-reported physical activity and dietary changes, exercise self-efficacy, health status, health-related quality of life, and accelerometry in a subsample. RESULTS: Of 58 community-based organizations approached, nearly half engaged with MOVE UP. Facilities included neighborhood community centers (25%), YMCAs (25%), senior service centers (20%), libraries (18%), senior living residences (6%), and churches (6%). Of 24 site-based cohorts with baseline data completed through November 2017, 21 community health workers were recruited and trained to implement the standardized intervention, and 287 participants were enrolled (mean age 68 years, 89% female, 33% African American, other, or more than one race). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The MOVE UP translational recruitment, training, and intervention approach is feasible and could be generalizable to diverse aging individuals with obesity and a variety of baseline medical conditions. Additional data regarding strategies for program sustainability considering program cost, organizational capacity, and other adaptations will inform public health dissemination efforts.

Community-Based Healthy Aging Interventions for Older Adults with Arthritis and Multimorbidity.

Examine the impact of programs led by community health workers on health and function in older adults with arthritis and other health conditions. We conducted a cluster-randomized trial of the Arthritis Foundation Exercise Program (AFEP) enhanced with the "10 Keys"™ to Healthy Aging compared with the AFEP program at 54 sites in 462 participants (mean age 73 years, 88 % women, 80 % white). Trained Community health workers delivered the 10-week programs. Outcomes assessed after 6 months included physical performance [Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, and preventive health behaviors. Both groups experienced improvements. Performance improved by 0.3 SPPB points in the AFEP/"10 Keys"™ group and 0.5 in AFEP alone; WOMAC scores declined by 3.0 and 3.9 points respectively. More participants had controlled hypertension at 6 months in both groups (60.1 % baseline to 76.7 % in AFEP/10 Keys and from 76.5 to 84.9 % in AFEP alone) and greater diabetes control (from 15.0 to 34.9 and 15.5 to 34.1 %, respectively). These community-based programs showed similar improvements in preventive health, mobility and arthritis outcomes.

Partnership Building and Implementation of an Integrated Healthy-Aging Program.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions exist for prevention of chronic disease in older adults. Partnering with community organizations may provide a mechanism for disseminating these interventions. OBJECTIVE: To describe the partnership and program implementation by the Arthritis Foundation (AF) and the University of Pittsburgh. METHODS: The AF Exercise Program (AFEP; an existing evidence-based program) was enhanced with the "10 Keys"™ to Healthy Aging (a prevention-focused program bundling the most common risk factors for chronic disease and disability in older adults and applies behavior change strategies to enhance prevention). The program was delivered in 20 sessions over 10 weeks by community health workers in a cluster-randomized trial. LESSONS LEARNED: Partnering with an organization having an existing infrastructure supports program delivery at the community level. This partnership provided programming in 54 sites across Pittsburgh and surrounding communities. CONCLUSIONS: This collaborative partnership created a productive synergy maximizing strengths in both research and program delivery.

Outcomes of mild cognitive impairment by definition: a population study.

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been defined in several ways. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 1-year outcomes of MCI by different definitions at the population level. DESIGN: Inception cohort with 1-year follow-up. Participants were classified as having MCI using the following definitions operationalized for this study: amnestic MCI by Mayo criteria, expanded MCI by International Working Group criteria, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5, and a purely cognitive classification into amnestic and nonamnestic MCI. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Stratified random population-based sample of 1982 individuals 65 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each MCI definition, there were 3 possible outcomes: worsening (progression to dementia [CDR ≥ 1] or severe cognitive impairment), improvement (reversion to CDR = 0 or normal cognition), and stability (unchanged CDR or cognitive status). RESULTS: Regardless of MCI definition, over 1 year, a small proportion of participants progressed to CDR > 1 (range, 0%-3%) or severe cognitive impairment (0%-20%) at rates higher than their cognitively normal peers. Somewhat larger proportions of participants improved or reverted to normal (6%-53%). Most participants remained stable (29%-92%). Where definitions focused on memory impairment and on multiple cognitive domains, higher proportions progressed and lower proportions reverted on the CDR. CONCLUSIONS: As ascertained by several operational definitions, MCI is a heterogeneous entity at the population level but progresses to dementia at rates higher than in normal elderly individuals. Proportions of participants progressing to dementia are lower and proportions reverting to normal are higher than in clinical populations. Memory impairments and impairments in multiple domains lead to greater progression and lesser improvement. Research criteria may benefit from validation at the community level before incorporation into clinical practice.

Engagement in reading and hobbies and risk of incident dementia: the MoVIES project.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there is an association between engagement in reading and hobbies and dementia risk in late life. METHODS: A total of 942 members of a population-based, prospective cohort study were followed biennially to identify incident dementia cases. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of dementia in relation to baseline total number of activities and time commitment to reading and hobbies. RESULTS: A lower risk for dementia was found for a greater number of activities and for a high (about 1 hour each day) compared with low (less than 30 minutes each day) weekly time commitment to hobbies, independent of covariates. Only the protective effect of hobbies remained after methods were used to minimize bias due to potential preclinical dementia. CONCLUSION: Engaging in hobbies for 1 or more hours every day might be protective against dementia in late life.

A novel approach to assessing memory at the population level: vulnerability to semantic interference.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in identifying novel cognitive paradigms to help detect preclinical dementia. Promising results have been found in clinical settings using the Semantic Interference Test (SIT), a modification of an existing episodic memory test (Fuld Object Memory Evaluation) that exploits vulnerability to semantic interference in Alzheimer's disease. It is not yet known how broadly this work will generalize to the community at large. METHODS: Participants aged > or = 65 years from the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) were administered the SIT at study entry. Independent of neuropsychological assessment, participants were rated on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, based on reported loss of cognitively driven everyday functioning. In individuals free of dementia (CDR < 1), the concurrent validity of the SIT was assessed by determining its association with CDR using multiple logistic regression models, with CDR 0 (no dementia) vs. 0.5 (possible dementia) as the outcome and the SIT test variables as predictors. RESULTS: Poorer performance on all SIT variables but one was associated with higher CDR reflecting possible dementia (Odds Ratios 2.24-4.79). Younger age and female gender also conferred a performance advantage. Years of education and reading ability (a proxy for quality of education) evidenced a very weak association with SIT performance. CONCLUSIONS: The SIT shows promise as a valid, novel measure to identify early preclinical dementia in a community setting. It has potential utility for assessment of persons who may be illiterate or of low education. Finally, we provide normative SIT data stratified by age which may be utilized by clinicians or researchers in future investigations.

How much do depressive symptoms affect cognition at the population level? The Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of subjective depressive symptoms on objective performance on tests of several cognitive domains, in a community-based sample of older adults. METHODS: An age-stratified sample of 2036 individuals aged 65+ years was drawn from the electoral rolls of a U.S. community, excluding individuals with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. A cognitive test battery and a modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (mCES-D) were completed by 1982 participants. Cognitive test scores were compared across levels of depressive symptoms, and composite scores created to represent cognitive domains of attention, language, memory, visuospatial, and executive function. Multivariable regression models tested the association of depressive symptoms with cognitive domain composite scores, adjusting for age, sex, race, and education. RESULTS: Most participants reported no depressive symptoms. Small differences in cognitive scores were observed on all tests among those with 0, 1-2, and > or = 3 symptoms. Adjusting for demographic variables, depressive symptoms remained associated with lower performance on all cognitive composites except attention, most strongly with executive function. Depressive symptoms explained <2% of the variance in test scores, less than that explained by age or education. CONCLUSION: In this population-based sample of older adults, restricted to those with normal or only mildly impaired cognition, a relatively small proportion reported any depressive symptoms. The number of depressive symptoms had strong statistically significant associations with performance in most cognitive domains. However, depressive symptoms explained little of the variance in cognitive performance, with relatively small differences in scores among those with and without symptoms.

Simple balance and mobility tests can assess falls risk when cognition is impaired.

To examine the ability of the Romberg test and the original untimed version of the Get-Up-and-Go test (GUG) to elders at risk for falls. At baseline and two annual follow-up visits, nurses administered the Romberg and GUG tests to 358 primary care patients aged 65+ years. Logistic regression models examined cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between abnormal balance tests and self-reported falls over the preceding year. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education and self-rated health (and, in the longitudinal models, for baseline falls), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as a measure of cognitive status. In cross-sectional analyses, falls reported at baseline were significantly associated with concurrently abnormal Romberg and GUG tests, after adjustment for covariates. In longitudinal analyses, abnormal GUG remained significantly associated with future falls, adjusting for covariates. Among those with low MMSE, GUG remained a significant predictor of future falls. Both balance tests were associated with low MMSE among those reporting no falls. Simple balance tests can help assess falls risk, particularly in cognitively impaired elderly who have elevated falls risk and might not accurately recall previous falls.

The association between congestive heart failure and cognitive performance in a primary care population of elderly adults: the Steel Valley Seniors Survey.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests an association between congestive heart failure (CHF) and cognitive function, particularly in heart transplant patients and patients hospitalized for CHF. We examined the association between CHF and cognitive performance in stable outpatients recruited from primary care. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional secondary data analysis of the Steel Valley Seniors Survey, an epidemiological study of elderly primary care outpatients. Participants aged >/= 65 years were recruited in primary care clinics. The study cohort (n = 354) is a subgroup, composed of subjects with Mini-mental State Examination score < 25, and a random sample of the remaining, who underwent a baseline assessment in the home. The assessment included demographics, comorbid illnesses, depressive symptoms, functional status, a neurological examination and a neuropsychological battery. CHF is defined by self-report and/or chart review, and stable CHF as not being hospitalized in the year prior to the assessment. The associations between CHF and specific cognitive tests were examined by bivariate analysis and logistic regression, controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Subjects with CHF performed worse on tests of visual memory [10.1 (S.D. 5.4) vs. 12.7 (S.D. 5.2), p = 0.007], Trailmaking B [0.1 (0.1) vs. 0.2 (0.1), p = 0.002], category fluency [11.1 (4.4) vs. 13.4 (4.5), p = 0.008], and clock drawing [5.6 (1.9) vs. 6.7 (1.4), p < 0.001] compared to subjects without CHF, after adjustment for relevant demographic variables. CONCLUSION: CHF is associated with lower cognitive functioning in a population of patients with stable heart failure in primary care settings.

Discrepancies in information provided to primary care physicians by patients with and without dementia: the Steel Valley Seniors Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine associations between discrepancies in health information provided to primary care providers and severity of impairment in older patients with and without dementia. METHODS: This study included brief assessment and medical record review of 1,107 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 76.3 (6.6) years (range: 65-100 years) in seven small-town primary care practices. In 358 patients, detailed in-home assessment included demographics; dementia by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale; and frequencies of memory complaints, falls, and inadvertent medication nonadherence determined from medical records and standardized in-home research assessments. Main outcome variables were trends in discrepancies between chart reviews and research assessments. Main explanatory variable was CDR box total scores. RESULTS: Proportions of patients reporting memory complaints and falls, and evidence of inadvertent nonadherence, in the charts and by research assessment increased with CDR. Discrepancies between medical record and research assessment, were also associated with CDR, showing linear trends for memory complaints and inadvertent nonadherence and a quadratic trend for falls. CONCLUSION: Memory complaints, falls, and inadvertent medication nonadherence increase with dementia severity. The levels of discrepancy between information patients provided to their physicians and information they provided in response to detailed, standardized assessments, also varied with dementia severity. Physicians should be alert to the possibility of receiving unreliable health information from even mildly demented patients, whether or not dementia has been detected.

Gambling participation and social support among older adults: a longitudinal community study.

The purpose of this preliminary study was to examine associations between leaving home to engage in bingo or gambling activity and indices of physical and mental health and social support among a representative community cohort of 1016 elderly people. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data gathered from a prospective epidemiological study in a rural, low socio-economic status, area of Pennsylvania was employed. The cohort had a mean age of 78.8 (SD = 5.1) (range 71-97) and participated in three consecutive biennial "waves" of data collection. Nearly half (47.7) of the cohort reported gambling. To predict gambling, the independent variables included age, sex, education, employment, social support, depressive symptoms, self-rated health, alcohol use, cigarette use, and cognitive functioning. In cross-sectional, univariate analyses, gambling was associated with younger age, sex (male), fewer years of education, greater social support, lower depression scores, better self-rated health, alcohol use in the past year, and higher cognitive functioning. In a cross-sectional multiple regression model, younger age, greater social support, and alcohol use in the past year remain strongly and independently associated with gambling activity. Longitudinally, age, sex, social support, alcohol use, and gambling are predictive of future gambling activity. The results revealed that gambling may offer a forum of social support to older adults who are often isolated as they age.

Exercise level and cognitive decline: the MoVIES project.

Growing evidence suggests that physical exercise may be protective against cognitive impairment and decline. A prospective study of a representative rural community sample (N = 1,146) aged 65+ years examined self-reported exercise habits and measured global cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). A composite variable "exercise level" combining type, frequency, and duration of exercise was created with three levels: "high exercise" (aerobic exercise of > or = 30 minute duration > or = 3 times a week), "low exercise" (all other exercise groups), and "no exercise." Cognitive decline was defined as being in the 90 percentile of decline in this cohort, ie, declining by 3 or more MMSE points during the 2-year interval between two assessments. In a multiple regression model, high exercise level at the baseline assessment was negatively associated with, ie, was protective against, being in the group with the greatest amount of decline at the follow-up assessment, after adjusting for likely confounders (odds ratio = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.19, 0.78). When high exercise was redefined using frequency as > or = 5 days per week as the threshold, as per the Surgeon General's guidelines, both low exercise and high exercise were negatively associated with cognitive decline. Exercise may have implications for prevention of cognitive decline.