RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reducing the number of active compounds for lifelong HIV treatment is of interest, especially to reduce potential long-term side effects. So far, available data assessing viral control, support the robustness and safety of 2DR (2-drug regimen) ART compared to 3DR. However, further in-depth investigations of the viral reservoirs are mandatory to guarantee long-term safety of these regimens regarding stable intact HIV-1 DNA copies, HIV-1 RNA transcripts and sustained immunological control. METHODS: The Rumba study is the first prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of switch from 3DR to 2DR on the viral reservoir. Participants on any stable 2nd generation INSTI-based 3DR regimen with HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml plasma for at least 3 months were randomized to switch to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC, N=89) or to switch or stay on bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF, N=45). After 48 weeks, virological, immunological and metabolic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: We did not observe a significant difference in change over time in the mean number of intact HIV-1 DNA copies/million CD4+ T cells with DTG/3TC compared to B/F/TAF. There was no evidence in this study that switching to DTG/3TC increased the active reservoir by HIV-1 transcription. No significant changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines or major immune cell subsets were observed. Changes in exhaustion and activation of specific cellular subsets were small and bidirectional. Metabolic outcomes are similar between the treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety of DTG/3TC compared to B/F/TAF through viral control after in-depth investigations of the intact HIV-1 reservoir, HIV-1 transcription and inflammatory markers.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 300 mg camostat mesylate three times daily in a fasted state to treat early phase COVID-19 in an ambulatory setting. METHODS: We conducted a phase II randomized controlled trial in symptomatic (maximum 5 days) and asymptomatic patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either camostat mesylate or a placebo. Outcomes included change in nasopharyngeal viral load, time to clinical improvement, the presence of neutralizing antibodies, and safety. RESULTS: Of 96 participants randomized between November 2020 and June 2021, analyses were performed on the data of 90 participants who completed treatment (N = 61 camostat mesylate, N = 29 placebo). The estimated mean change in cycle threshold between day 1 and day 5 between the camostat and placebo group was 1.183 (P = 0.511). The unadjusted hazard ratio for clinical improvement in the camostat group was 0.965 (95% confidence interval, 0.480-1.942, P = 0.921 by Cox regression). The percentage distribution of the 50% neutralizing antibody titer at day 28 visit and frequency of adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Under this protocol, camostat mesylate was not found to be effective as an antiviral drug against SARS-CoV-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04625114; November 12, 2020.