RESUMO
The diagnosis and evaluation of neuromuscular disorders traditionally involves electrodiagnostic (EDx) testing, including nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and electromyography (EMG). These tools can cause pain and discomfort, an important consideration when performed on children. Neuromuscular ultrasound is noninvasive, cost-effective, and increasingly utilized for the detection of neuromuscular pathology. Studies investigating the performance and clinical implementation of ultrasound have primarily been performed in adult populations. Ultrasound in children has the potential to guide EDx testing and ultimately improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. This review aims to describe key features of neuromuscular ultrasound in the pediatric population based on the available studies, including our own institutional experience.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are critical tools used in the assessment and reporting of surgical outcomes. However, significant differences in PROM scores have not been shown to consistently correlate with clinical improvement from the physician or patient perspective. Defining a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMs offers interpretation of surgical outcomes with an emphasis on patient-centered feedback. The goal of this study was to define a MCID for the following PROMs in lumbar tubular microdecompression (LTMD) patients: the EuroQol-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) index, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), leg pain visual analog scale (VAS), and low back pain VAS. METHODS: This study examined 235 index LTMD patients with PROMs collected at preoperative evaluation and 1-year follow-up. Using an anchor-based approach with patient satisfaction index, a receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to define a MCID in the EQ-5D index, ODI, leg pain VAS, and low back pain VAS. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 65.18 ± 12.81 years, and 47.7% were male. The MCID values for the EQ-5D, ODI, leg pain VAS, and low back pain VAS are 0.219, 15.0-16.5, 0.5, and 2.5-3.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps define a MCID for the EQ-5D index in LTMD patients. Given its ease of administration and economic relevance, further characterization of the EQ-5D index may warrant its use as a potential alternative or adjunct to the routinely collected PROMs following spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are critical in evaluating the effectiveness of surgical spine interventions. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is commonly used but tedious to administer routinely. The EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is easier to administer but not traditionally used to measure spine surgical results. This study aimed to investigate the correlation of commonly administered PROMs in lumbar tubular microdecompression patients, and to consider whether ODI could be predicted from remaining PROMs. METHODS: This study examined 304 index lumbar tubular microdecompression patients with PROMs collected at routine intervals. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for each pairwise combination of the following PROMs: ODI, EQ-5D index, leg pain visual analog scale (VAS), low back pain VAS, health state item. Linear regression modeling was conducted to predict ODI from the remaining four PROMs. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 65.55 ± 12.97 years and 46.4% were male. Each combination of PROMs demonstrated a statistically significant pairwise correlation (P < 0.001). ODI showed strong correlation with EQ-5D index (r = -0.77), leg pain VAS (r = 0.73), and back pain VAS (r = 0.65), but weak correlation with health state item (r = -0.33). Forwards stepwise model selection yielded a multiple linear regression model including all four PROMs predictors, with an adjusted R2 of 0.690. There was strong correlation between predicted and observed ODI (r = 0.83, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ODI can be predicted from EQ-5D, leg and low back pain VAS, and health state items with moderate accuracy. The added utility of capturing ODI routinely may not out-weigh the challenges in doing so.