Guidelines for the management of chronic cough in adults. Endorsed by the French speaking society of respiratory diseases (Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française, SPLF), the Société Française d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Chirurgie de la Face et du Cou (SFORL), the Société Française de Phoniatrie et de Laryngologie (SFPL), the Société Nationale Française de Gastro-entérologie (SNFGE).

Patients with chronic cough experience a high alteration of quality of life. Moreover, chronic cough is a complex entity with numerous etiologies and treatments. In order to help clinicians involved in the management of patients with chronic cough, guidelines on chronic cough have been established by a group of French experts. These guidelines address the definitions of chronic cough and the initial management of patients with chronic cough. We present herein second-line tests that might be considered in patients with cough persistence despite initial management. Experts also propose a definition of unexplained or refractory chronic cough (URCC) in order to better identify patients whose cough persists despite optimal management. Finally, these guidelines address the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions useful in URCC. Thus, amitryptilline, pregabalin, gabapentin or morphine combined with speech and/or physical therapy are a mainstay of treatment strategies in URCC. Other treatment options, such as P2 × 3 antagonists, are being developed.

Assessment of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association Chronic Constipation Criteria: An Asian Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is a need for a simple and practical tool adapted for the diagnosis of chronic constipation (CC) in the Asian population. This study compared the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association (ANMA) CC tool and Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of CC in Asian subjects. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study included subjects presenting at outpatient gastrointestinal clinics across Asia. Subjects with CC alert symptoms completed a combination Diagnosis Questionnaire to obtain a diagnosis based on 4 different diagnostic methods: self-defined, investigator's judgment, ANMA CC tool, and Rome III criteria. The primary endpoint was the level of agreement/disagreement between the ANMA CC diagnostic tool and Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of CC. RESULTS: The primary analysis comprised of 449 subjects, 414 of whom had a positive diagnosis according to the ANMA CC tool. Rome III positive/ANMA positive and Rome III negative/ANMA negative diagnoses were reported in 76.8% and 7.8% of subjects, respectively, resulting in an overall percentage agreement of 84.6% between the 2 diagnostic methods. The overall percentage disagreement between these 2 diagnostic methods was 15.4%. A higher level of agreement was seen between the ANMA CC tool and self-defined (374 subjects [90.3%]) or investigator's judgment criteria (388 subjects [93.7%]) compared with the Rome III criteria. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the ANMA CC tool can be a useful for Asian patients with CC.

Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for severe constipation in adults: feasibility, durability, functional and quality of life results at 1 year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The percutaneous endoscopic ceacostomy (PEC) for antegrade colonic enemas (ACE) has recently been proposed as a less invasive alternative to the Malone procedure in chronic constipated patients. Although the feasibility and safety of this innovative approach has been demonstrated, its functional results remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate constipation symptoms and quality of life 1 year after the PEC placement. METHOD: From Oct 2007 to Apr 2011, 21 severely constipated patients who required ACE were prospectively included. They underwent endoscopic placement of Chait caecostomy catheter (Cook Medical). Patients completed standardized questionnaires to assess constipation (KESS) and quality of life (GIQLI) scores pre PEC placement and at 1 year. Adverse events and caecostomy use data were also documented. RESULTS: The caecostomy catheter was successfully placed in 19 patients. Complications were all minor, including chronic wound pain (n = 9), serous leakage (n = 7), superficial wound infection (n = 2) and accidental catheter removal (n = 2). Chronic wound pain led to definitive catheter removal in 5 (26 %) patients. One patient died from unrelated cause before the end of the follow-up. At 1 year, 11 (61 %) of the alive patients still performed ACE. During the period of ACE administration, 14 (74 %) patients suspended use of laxatives and retrograde irrigations. Constipation and quality of life scores were available in 15 patients. Median KESS score improved from 25 (12-39) before PEC to 17 (6-34) 1 year after PEC (p < 0.05). Median GIQLI score increased from 69 (25-108) to 95 (48-119) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PEC placement achieves satisfying functional and quality of life results, and allows approximately 3/4 of patients to suspend laxatives and retrograde enemas. Nevertheless, 1/4 of the patients ask for the PEC removal because of chronic wound pain. In order to improve long-term durability of the device, a better prevention of pain is required.

The Chicago classification for achalasia in a French multicentric cohort.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is divided into 3 subtypes using the Chicago classification for high-resolution manometry. Aim of this study was to apply this classification to a multicentric French cohort of achalasia and to compare clinical and manometric characteristics between the 3 subtypes. METHODS: Oesophageal symptoms were collected in a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with achalasia on high-resolution manometry. Manometry data were analyzed with oesophago-gastric junction resting and relaxation pressures, and upper oesophageal sphincter resting pressure. Achalasia was classified according to the Chicago classification. RESULTS: From 2007 to August 2011, achalasia was diagnosed in 169 patients, 14% classified as type I, 70% as type II and 16% as type III. Type III patients were older than types I and II (62 years vs. 52, p = 0.03). Ninety five percent of patients complained of dysphagia, 16% of chest pain (no difference between the 3 subtypes); 50% of type I patients presented regurgitations compared to 33% of type II and 22% of type III (p = 0.10). Oesophago-gastric junction and upper oesophageal sphincter pressures did not differ between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Type II was the more prevalent subtype of achalasia in this French multicentre cohort. The older age of patients with type III achalasia suggests a different pathophysiology.