T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia: Epidemiology and survival trends in the era of novel treatments.

Survival remains poor for T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, though treatment in recent years, associated with access to novel therapies, and management at academic medical centers is associated with improved outcomes. There remains a critical need to improve the available treatment options for this population, and access to specialized academic medical centers, comprehensive supportive care, clinical trials, and early palliative care remains essential for T-PLL patients.

Epidemiologic Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Survival Analysis of Plasmablastic Lymphoma in the United States: A SEER and NCDB Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Plasmablastic Lymphoma (PBL) is a rare aggressive B-cell lymphoma that primarily affects immunocompromised individuals, including those living with HIV. Historically, survival estimates are dismal and range from 8 to 15 months. We aimed to evaluate epidemiologic characteristics, treatment patterns and survival trends on a national scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PBL from 2010 to 2020 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Incidence rates were calculated using SEER. Demographic features, treatment characteristics, and overall survival (OS) were identified using the NCDB. RESULTS: We identified 1153 patients in the SEER database and 1822 patients in the NCDB. The incidence of PBL is 0.07 cases per 100,000 US population per year. PBL is more common in males (77%), and white patients (77%), with 50% of cases in patients with HIV. Patients who were treated with multiagent chemotherapy had a median OS of 58.6 months. On multivariate Cox regression, we found that HIV status did not have a significant impact on OS. Factors associated with worse OS included advancing age and stage. CONCLUSION: We present the largest study to date on PBL. Among treated patients, we described a median OS of 58.6 months, greatly improved from previously reported estimates. We found that HIV status did not have a significant impact on OS. While OS remains poor, therapeutic advances over the last decade are promising and highlight the need for continued clinical advances aimed at improving therapeutic options for this rare lymphoma.

Survival Outcomes of Limited-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with favorable risk limited-stage (LS) diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have shown excellent outcomes without radiotherapy (RT). However, the role of RT for the remainder of LS-DLBCL patients is less well defined. We aimed to investigate whether the addition of RT provided an overall survival (OS) benefit in a real-world cohort of LS-DLBCL patients based on primary site at presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data from 39,745 patients with stage I and II DLBCL treated with front-line combination chemotherapy alone or followed by RT were identified using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. RESULTS: The addition of RT was associated with improved 5-year OS for all LS patients as compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone (85% vs. 80%, P < .001). RT was associated with improved 5-year OS in both the nodal and extranodal disease patients (nodal: 85% vs. 80%, P < .001; extranodal: 83% vs. 79%; P < .001). Extranodal sites with prolonged OS from the addition of RT include skin and soft tissue, head and neck, testicular, and thyroid sites (all P < .02). Breast, bone, lung and gastrointestinal extranodal primary sites had no OS benefit from the inclusion of RT. In multivariate analysis, the addition of RT was an independent factor for improved survival for all LS patients ([HR] 0.84, 95% [CI] 0.81-0.88; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Though there is no consensus on optimal treatment indications for RT in LS-DLBCL, these data suggest certain subgroups may have benefit when RT is added to front-line chemotherapy.

Socioeconomic Factors Associated With a Late-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Background Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive, lethal cancer. It is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is often asymptomatic until later stages. Thus, it is critical to identify patients earlier in their disease course. Socioeconomic factors can assist in determining who is at higher risk of presenting at later stages of the disease. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aim to identify the associations between socioeconomic factors and the stage of pancreatic cancer at diagnosis. Methodology In this study, 256,822 patients from the NCDB who were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from 2004 to 2018 at stage 0-I and stage IV were compared based on age, race, sex, ethnicity, insurance type, income, geographic location, education, and Charlson-Deyo score. Demographic factors of patients who presented with early and late-stage disease were compared using the chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression. Results We identified significant associations between race, sex, insurance status, education, income, and geographic location with the stage of disease at diagnosis. Males were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage cancer than early-stage (52.8% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001). Females were more likely to have an earlier-stage diagnosis when compared to males (odds ratio (OR) = 0.857, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.839-0.875, p < 0.001). Black patients presented at a later stage when compared to White patients (OR = 1.106, 95% CI = 1.069-1.144, p < 0.001). Private and Medicaid insurance had higher rates of late-stage diagnosis than early stages, and all other types of insurance had lower rates of late-stage diagnosis than patients without insurance (p < 0.001). Patients from a zip code with less than $38,000 median household income and zip codes with lower levels of high school graduation had higher rates of late-stage diagnosis (p < 0.025). Conclusions Factors associated with the increased likelihood of pancreatic cancer presentation at the advanced stage compared to the early stage include multiple minority and traditionally underserved populations. Black race, underinsurance, or residing in low-income or low-education zip codes was significantly associated with presenting at a late stage, which is strongly associated with worse survival outcomes.

Influence of racial and ethnic identity on overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Overall survival for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients by race; propensity score matched by age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, insurance, and income and education level of zip code of residence.

Impact of academic medical center access on outcomes in multiple myeloma.

Treatment at academic cancer centers (ACs) is associated with improved survival across hematologic malignancies, though the benefit in multiple myeloma (MM) has not been examined. This study aims to evaluate survival outcomes at Commission on Cancer accredited ACs compared to non-academic centers (NACs) for patients receiving MM-directed therapy. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify demographics and overall survival (OS) of MM patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2017 and to compare outcomes by facility type. Survival analysis was repeated in a propensity score matched cohort, with NACs matched 1:1 to ACs by age, race, comorbidity score, insurance, year of diagnosis, distance traveled, and income. Of 163 375 MM patients, 44.5% were treated at ACs. Patients at ACs were more likely to receive MM-directed therapy compared to NACs (81% vs. 73%, p < .001). For patients receiving treatment, median OS at ACs was 71.3 months versus 41.2 months at NACs (p < .001). When adjusted for baseline demographics, patients treated at ACs had reduced mortality; hazard ratio (HR) 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.81, p < .001). The propensity score matched cohort maintained this survival benefit with a median OS of 59.9 months at ACs versus 37.0 months at NACs (p < .001), HR of 0.66 (95% CI 0.64-0.67, p < .001). ACs treated younger patients with fewer comorbidities and were more likely to treat racial minorities and patients with Medicaid or private insurance, and the uninsured. In this analysis, MM patients treated at ACs have significantly improved survival. While potentially related to access to specialized care, socioeconomic factors that drive facility selection may also contribute.

Academic Centers Compared With Nonacademic Centers for Patients With International Prognostic Index Risk-stratified Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Survival Outcomes Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease associated with varying outcomes. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) has been the standard for the baseline prognostic assessment in these patients. The present study aimed to determine the effect of the treatment facility on the overall survival outcomes in patients with DLBCL stratified by IPI risk groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with a diagnosis of DLBCL from 2004 to 2015. DLBCL was stratified by the IPI risk score from low- to high-risk disease, and the overall survival of those treated at academic centers was compared with that of those treated at nonacademic centers. RESULTS: Treatment at academic centers was associated with significantly improved overall survival for all patients with DLBCL (108.3 months) compared with those treated at nonacademic centers (74.5 months; P < .001). The median survival for patients with high-risk disease treated at academic centers (33.5 months) was more than twice that of high-risk patients treated at nonacademic centers (14.4 months; P < .001). The median survival for the other risk categories was similarly improved, although less pronounced in the lower IPI score groups. The long-term overall survival for all patients with DLBCL at academic centers was improved at 5 and 10 years (59% and 43% survival, respectively) compared with those treated at nonacademic centers (51% and 35% survival, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with DLBCL treated at academic centers demonstrated improved survival compared with those treated at nonacademic centers, especially those with high-risk disease. Further investigations into the factors contributing to such disparities are required to help standardize care and improve outcomes.