Immunogenicity and safety of heterologous versus homologous prime-boost schedules with inactivated and adenoviral vectored SARS-CoV-2 vaccines - A prospective multi-center study.

Background: During the peak of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Thailand when the emergence of delta variant reduced the efficacy of inactivated vaccine, Thailand had abundance of inactivated vaccine but mRNA vaccine was not available and the supply of adenoviral-vectored vaccine was limited. The heterologous vaccination using CoronaVac and ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vaccines was applied. We aim to compare the immunogenicity of immune response of primary vaccination with homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and heterologous vaccination with CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Methods: A total of 430 adults, scheduled to receive ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 as their second dose of primary COVID-19 vaccination, were enrolled. Participants were classified into two groups based on the first dose vaccine as CoronaVac (heterologous group) or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (homologous group). The primary outcome was antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) titres at 28 days after the second dose of vaccination. Secondary outcomes were anti-RBD titres at 90 days, surrogate viral neutralizing test (sVNT) at 28 and 90 days, and adverse events. Findings: In 358 participants with correct vaccine interval, the anti-RBD geometric mean titre ratio for the heterologous versus homologous group was 0.55 (95%CI; 0.44-0.067); p < 0.001 at day 28, and 0.80 (95%CI; 0.65-1.00); P = 0.05 at day 90. Median sVNT neutralizing activity was not significantly different in the heterologous versus homologous group at 28 days (93.5 vs 92.7 %); p = 0.13, but significantly higher in the heterologous group at day 90 (82.9 vs 76.4 %); p = 0.01. Interpretation: The homologous vaccination resulted in higher anti-RBD titres at 28 days after vaccination, but titres in the homologous group showed more rapid decline at 90 days. In the sVNT assay, median neutralization was similar at 28 days, but was longer-lasting and higher in the heterologous group at 90 days. Funding: This research received funding from the Royal College of Physicians of Thailand special grant 2021 for research initiative during COVID-19 pandemic.

Biosimilar erythropoietin in anemia treatment (BEAT)-Efficacy and safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from EPREX® to EPIAO® in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: A prospective, randomized, double blind, parallel group study.

BACKGROUND: EPREX®/ERYPO®/PROCRIT® (epoetin alfa, Janssen-Cilag GmbH) was the first available recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) and was universally reference product as per the recommendation provided by European Medicines Agency. EPIAO® is a biosimilar formulation of EPREX®, and making it a 1:1 dose conversion from EPREX® according to recommendation of European Medicines Agency. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of EPIAO® in subjects with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis after intravenous administration. METHODS: This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 2-cohort, maintenance phase, therapeutic equivalence study to evaluate a 1:1 dose conversion from EPREX® to EPIAO® in terms of clinical efficacy and safety that was conducted at 20 sites in 2 countries in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Eligible subjects were treated with EPREX® (reference product of epoetin) for a period of at least 3 months before the treatment period, and then were randomly assigned to the group of EPREX® or EPIAO®. Primary endpoints were mean absolute change in hemoglobin level and mean absolute change in weekly epoetin dosage from baseline to 6 months after treatment with EPIAO®/EPREX® in parallel groups. RESULTS: A total of 200 people received the random intervention and were included in the safety set. After 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment with EPIAO® or EPREX®, there were no significant differences in the hemoglobin levels of the 2 groups compared with baseline. The 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference was within the predetermined acceptable range: ±0.5 g/dL. There were no significant differences in the epoetin dosage of the 2 groups compared with the baseline. The 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference was within the predetermined acceptable range: ± 45 IU/kg. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the EPIAO® and EPREX® groups. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and were reverted/resolved. CONCLUSION: EPIAO® demonstrated promising effectiveness and manageable safety in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.

Economic evaluation of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Thai population with End-stage Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to conduct a cost-utility analysis of the "Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)-First" policy in 2008 under a universal health coverage scheme and hemodialysis (HD) in Thai patients with End-stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) using updated real-practice data. METHODS: Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-utility of two modalities, stratified into five age groups based on the first modality taken at 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 years old from government and societal perspectives. Input parameters related to clinical aspects and cost were obtained from 15 hospitals throughout Thailand and Thai Renal Replacement Therapy databases. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%, adjusted to 2021, and converted to USD (1 USD = 33.57 Thai Baht). One-way analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the uncertainty surrounding model parameters. RESULTS: From the government perspective, compared to PD-first policy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was between 19,434 and 23,796 USD per QALY. Conversely, from a societal perspective, the ICER was between 31,913 and 39,912 USD per QALY. Both are higher than the willingness to pay threshold of 4,766 USD per QALY. CONCLUSION: By applying the updated real-practice data, PD-first policy still remains more cost-effective than HD-first policy at the current willingness to pay. However, HD gained more quality-adjusted life years than PD. This information will assist clinicians and policymakers in determining the future direction of dialysis modality selection and kidney replacement therapy reimbursement policies for ESKD patients.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin as an Add-on to Standard of Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) creates a significant economic burden on patients and society. The DAPA-CKD trial reports the benefit of dapagliflozin in CKD patients; however, its cost-effectiveness is unknown in Thailand. This study evaluated the cost-utility of dapagliflozin in addition to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone in CKD patients. METHODS: A Markov model was employed to estimate lifetime costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with the modeled population aligned to the baseline characteristics of a DAPA-CKD trial, from a societal perspective. Effectiveness inputs were obtained from the DAPA-CKD trial. Costs and most utility data were gathered from published studies conducted in Thailand. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per annum. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, add-on dapagliflozin was estimated to increase life-years by 0.34 and QALY by 0.30 in comparison with SoC alone (7.13 vs. 6.78 years, 5.10 vs. 4.80 QALYs). Total cost was lower under dapagliflozin treatment than SoC treatment (648,413 THB vs. 689,284 THB or 20,947.64 USD vs. 22,268.01 USD). Cost saving occurred as a result of the lower costs of dialysis and KT. The findings were robust to the changes of inputs. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the DAPA-CKD trial, the add-on dapagliflozin results in cost saving compared favorably with SoC alone in Thailand. The benefit of dapagliflozin in delayed CKD progression is that it reduces the requirement for dialysis and KT, which can offset the costs of dapagliflozin and early CKD treatment.

Interventional nephrology and vascular access practice: A perspective from South and Southeast Asia.

South and Southeast Asia is the most populated, heterogeneous part of the world. The Association of Vascular Access and InTerventionAl Renal physicians (AVATAR Foundation), India, gathered trends on epidemiology and Interventional Nephrology (IN) for this region. The countries were divided as upper-middle- and higher-income countries as Group-1 and lower and lower-middle-income countries as Group-2. Forty-three percent and 70% patients in the Group 1 and 2 countries had unplanned hemodialysis (HD) initiation. Among the incident HD patients, the dominant Vascular Access (VA) was non-tunneled central catheter (non-TCC) in 70% of Group 2 and tunneled central catheter (TCC) in 32.5% in Group 1 countries. Arterio-Venous Fistula (AVF) in the incident HD patients was observed in 24.5% and 35% of patients in Group-2 and Group-1, respectively. Eight percent and 68.7% of the prevalent HD patients in Group-2 and Group-1 received HD through an AVF respectively. Nephrologists performing any IN procedure were 90% and 60% in Group-2 and Group 1, respectively. The common procedures performed by nephrologists include renal biopsy (93.3%), peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion (80%), TCC (66.7%) and non-TCC (100%). Constraints for IN include lack of time (73.3%), lack of back-up (40%), lack of training (73.3%), economic issues (33.3%), medico-legal problems (46.6%), no incentive (20%), other interests (46.6%) and institution not supportive (26%). Routine VA surveillance is performed in 12.5% and 83.3% of Group-2 and Group-1, respectively. To conclude, non-TCC and TCC are the most common vascular access in incident HD patients in Group-2 and Group-1, respectively. Lack of training, back-up support and economic constraints were main constraints for IN growth in Group-2 countries.

Peritoneal dialysis: Status report in South and South East Asia.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is largely underutilized globally. We analyzed PD utilization, impact of economic status, projected growth and impact of state policy(s) on PD growth in South Asia and Southeast Asia (SA&SEA) region. METHODS: The National Nephrology Societies of the region responded to a questionnaire on KRT practices. The responses were based on the latest registry data, acceptable community-based studies and societal perceptions. The representative countries were divided into high income and higher-middle income (HI & HMI) and low income and lower-middle income (LI & LMI) groups. RESULTS: Data provided by 15 countries showed almost similar percentage of GDP as health expenditure (4%-7%). But there was a significant difference in per capita income (HI & HMI -US$ 28 129 vs. LI & LMI - US$ 1710.2) between the groups. Even after having no significant difference in monthly cost of haemodialysis (HD) and PD in LI & LMI countries, they have poorer PD utilization as compared to HI & HMI countries (3.4% vs. 10.1%); the reason being lack of formal training/incentives and time constraints for the nephrologist while lack of reimbursement and poor general awareness of modalities has been a snag for the patients. The region expects ≥10% PD growth in the near future. Hong Kong and Thailand with 'PD first' policy have the highest PD utilization. CONCLUSION: Important deterrents to PD underutilization were lack of PD centric policies, lackadaisical patient/physician's attitude, lack of structured patient awareness programs, formal training programs and affordability.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin as an Add-On to Standard Treatment for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes treatment has incurred financial burden. We examined the cost-utility of adding dapagliflozin to the standard treatment for treating type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with cardiovascular risk in a Thai context. METHODS: A two-part model, decision tree and Markov models, was developed to capture the benefits in terms of heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease. The model was used to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes from a societal perspective. Costs were based on local data while the transitional probabilities and utilities were derived from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 clinical trial and published studies. Future costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: The increased cost of adding dapagliflozin from 8707 USD to 14,455 USD was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from 9.28 to 9.58, yielding an ICER of 18,988 USD/QALY. Compared with the standard treatment, the dapagliflozin group acquired more clinical benefits in terms of fewer HF hospitalizations and macroalbuminuria. Sensitivity analyses revealed that with high prevalence of diabetic nephropathy of 29.4-43.9%, the ICER would decline to 5591-8014 USD/QALY. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the DECLARE study with low incidence of T2DM complications and 4.2 years of median follow-up duration, the add-on dapagliflozin results in an ICER of 18,988 USD/QALY, which exceeds the local threshold of 5310 USD/QALY. Dapagliflozin would show better value for money in the context of high prevalence of T2DM complications.

Impact of National Economy and Policies on End-Stage Kidney Care in South Asia and Southeast Asia.

BACKGROUND: The association between economic status and kidney disease is incompletely explored even in countries with higher economy (HE); the situation is complex in lower economies (LE) of South Asia and Southeast Asia (SA and SEA). METHODS: Fifteen countries of SA and SEA categorized as HE and LE, represented by the representatives of the national nephrology societies, participated in this questionnaire and interview-based assessment of the impact of economic status on renal care. RESULTS: Average incidence and prevalence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) per million population (pmp) are 1.8 times and 3.3 times higher in HE. Hemodialysis is the main renal replacement therapy (RRT) (HE-68%, LE-63%). Funding of dialysis in HE is mainly by state (65%) or insurance bodies (30%); out of pocket expenses (OOPE) are high in LE (41%). Highest cost for hemodialysis is in Brunei and Singapore, and lowest in Myanmar and Nepal. Median number of dialysis machines/1000 ESKD population is 110 in HE and 53 in LE. Average number of machines/dialysis units in HE is 2.7 times higher than LE. The HE countries have 9 times more dialysis centers pmp (median HE-17, LE-02) and 16 times more nephrologist density (median HE-14.8 ppm, LE-0.94 ppm). Dialysis sessions >2/week is frequently followed in HE (84%) and <2/week in LE (64%). "On-demand" hemodialysis (<2 sessions/week) is prevalent in LE. Hemodialysis dropout rates at one year are lower in HE (12.3%; LE 53.4%), death being the major cause (HE-93.6%; LE-43.8%); renal transplants constitute 4% (Brunei) to 39% (Hong Kong) of the RRT in HE. ESKD burden is expected to increase >10% in all the HE countries except Taiwan, 10%-20% in the majority of LE countries. CONCLUSION: Economic disparity in SA and SEA is reflected by poor dialysis infrastructure and penetration, inadequate manpower, higher OOPE, higher dialysis dropout rates, and lesser renal transplantations in LE countries. Utility of RRT can be improved by state funding and better insurance coverage.

Aetiology, practice patterns and burden of end-stage kidney disease in South Asia and South-East Asia: A questionnaire-based survey.

AIM: There is paucity of data on the epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) from South Asia and South-East Asia. The objective of this study was to assess the aetiology, practice patterns and disease burden and growth of ESKD in the region comparing the economies. METHODS: The national nephrology societies of the region; responded to the questionnaire; based on latest registries, acceptable community-based studies and society perceptions. The countries in the region were classified into Group 1 (High|higher-middle-income) and Group 2 (lower|lowermiddle income). Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used for comparison. RESULTS: Fifteen countries provided the data. The average incidence of ESKD was estimated at 226.7 per million population (pmp), (Group 1 vs. Group 2, 305.8 vs. 167.8 pmp) and average prevalence at 940.8 pmp (Group 1 vs. Group 2, 1306 vs. 321 pmp). Group 1 countries had a higher incidence and prevalence of ESKD. Diabetes, hypertension and chronic glomerulonephritis were most common causes. The mean age in Group 2 was lower by a decade (Group 1 vs. Group 2-59.45 vs 47.7 years). CONCLUSION: Haemodialysis was the most common kidney replacement therapy in both groups and conservative management of ESKD was the second commonest available treatment option within Group 2. The disease burden was expected to grow >20% in 50% of Group 1 countries and 78% of Group 2 countries along with the parallel growth in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Recommendations by the Asian Pacific society of nephrology (APSN) on the appropriate use of HIF-PH inhibitors.

Renal anaemia is a common and important complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The current standard-of-care treatment for renal anaemia in CKD patients involves ensuring adequate iron stores and administration of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA). Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) is a key transcription factor primarily involved in the cellular regulation and efficiency of oxygen delivery. Manipulation of the HIF pathway by the use of HIF-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) has emerged as a novel approach for renal anaemia management. Despite it being approved for clinical use in various Asia-Pacific countries, its novelty mandates the need for nephrologists and clinicians generally in the region to well understand potential benefits and harms when prescribing this class of drug. The Asian Pacific society of nephrology HIF-PHI Recommendation Committee, formed by a panel of 11 nephrologists from the Asia-Pacific region who have clinical experience or have been investigators in HIF-PHI studies, reviewed and deliberated on the clinical and preclinical data concerning HIF-PHI. This recommendation summarizes the consensus views of the committee regarding the use of HIF-PHI, taking into account both available data and expert opinion in areas where evidence remains scarce.