Technical Feasibility and Clinical Efficacy of Iliac Vein Stent Placement in Adolescents and Young Adults with May-Thurner Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To report technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of iliac vein stent placement in adolescent patients with May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of the medical record between 2014 and 2021 found 63 symptomatic patients (F = 40/63; mean age 16.1 years, 12-20 years) who underwent left common iliac vein (LCIV) stent placement for treatment of LCIV compression from an overriding right common iliac artery, or equivalent (n = 1, left IVC). 32/63 (50.7%) patients presented with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL). 31/63 (49.2%) patients presented with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity and required catheter-directed thrombolysis after stent placement (tMTS). Outcomes include technically successful stent placement with resolution of anatomic compression and symptom improvement. Stent patency was monitored with Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet (AC/AP) regimens were reported. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 98.4%. 74 bare-metal self-expanding stents were placed in 63 patients. Primary patency at 12, and 24-months was 93.5%, and 88.9% for the NIVL group and 84.4% and 84.4% for the tMTS group for the same period. Overall patency for the same time intervals was 100%, and 95.4% for the NIVL group and 96.9%, and 96.9% for the tMTS group. Procedural complication rate was 3.2% (2/63) with no thrombolysis-related bleeding complications. Clinical success was achieved in 30/32 (93.8%) and 29/31 (93.5%) patients with tMTS and NIVL groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: CIV stent placement in the setting of tMTS and NIVL is technically feasible and clinically efficacious in young patients with excellent patency rates and a favorable safety profile.

Evaluation of Cancer Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Performance of the American College of Physicians Guideline.

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification of pulmonary embolism (PE) can reduce unnecessary imaging. We investigated the extent to which the American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline for evaluation of patients with suspected PE could be applied to cancer patients in the emergency department of a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from cancer patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between August 1, 2015, and October 31, 2015, were collected. We assessed each patient's diagnostic workup for its adherence to the ACP guideline in terms of clinical risk stratification and age-adjusted d-dimer level and the degree to which these factors were associated with PE. RESULTS: Of the 380 patients identified, 213 (56%) underwent CTPA indicated per the ACP guideline, and 78 (21%) underwent CTPA not indicated per the guideline. Only one of the patients who underwent nonindicated CTPA had a PE. Fifty-seven patients underwent unnecessary d-dimer evaluation, and 71 patients with negative d-dimer test results underwent nonindicated CTPA. PEs were found in 6 of 108 (6%) low-risk patients, 22 of 219 (10%) intermediate-risk patients, and 13 of 53 (25%) high-risk patients. The ACP guideline had negative predictive value of 99% (95% confidence interval: 93%-100%) and sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval: 86%-100%) in predicting PE. CONCLUSION: The ACP guideline has good sensitivity for detecting PE in cancer patients and thus can be applied in this population. Compliance with the ACP guideline when evaluating cancer patients with suspected PE could reduce the use of unnecessary imaging and laboratory studies.