Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction in polytrauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is characterized by severe colonic distension without mechanical obstruction. It has an uncertain pathogenesis and poses diagnostic challenges. This study aims to explore risk factors and clinical outcomes of ACPO in polytrauma patients, and contributing information to the limited literature on this condition. METHODS: This retrospective study, conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Centre, analysed data from trauma patients with ACPO admitted between July 2009 and June 2018. A control cohort of major trauma patients was utilized. Data review encompassed patient demographics, abdominal imaging, injury characteristics, analgesic usage, interventions, complications, and mortality. Statistical analyses, including logistic regression and correlation coefficients, were employed to identify risk factors. RESULTS: There were 57 cases of ACPO, with an incidence of 1.7 / 1000 patients, rising to 4.86 in major trauma. Predominantly affecting those over 50 years of age (75%) and males (75%), with motor vehicle accidents (50.8%) and falls from height (36.8%) being the commonest mechanisms. Noteworthy associated injuries included retroperitoneal bleeds (RPB) (37%), spinal fractures (37%), and pelvic fractures (37%). Analysis revealed significant associations between ACPO and Shock Index >0.9, Injury Severity Score > 18, opioid use, RPB, and pelvic fractures. A caecal diameter of ≥12 cm had a significant association with caecal ischemia or perforation. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the significance of ACPO in polytrauma patients, demonstrating associations with risk factors and clinical outcomes. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion, particularly in older patients with RPB, pelvic fractures, and opioid use. Early supportive therapy, vigilant monitoring, and timely interventions are crucial for a favourable outcome. Further research and prospective trials are warranted to validate these findings and enhance understanding of ACPO in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological, Level IV.

Assessing the necessity of intravenous contrast for computed tomography in the acute undifferentiated abdomen.

INTRODUCTION: Undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency setting is frequently investigated with an intravenous contrast enhanced CT as a first line diagnostic test. However, global contrast shortages restricted the use of contrast for a period in 2022, altering standard practice with many scans performed without intravenous contrast. Whilst IV contrast can be useful to assist with interpretation, its necessity in the setting of acute undifferentiated abdominal pain is not well described, and its use comes with its own risks. This study aimed to assess the shortcomings of omitting IV contrast in an emergency setting, by comparing the rate of CT scans with "indeterminate" findings with and without the use of IV contrast. METHODS: Data from presentations to a single centre emergency department for undifferentiated abdominal pain prior to and during contrast shortages in June 2022 were retrospectively compared. The primary outcome was the rate of diagnostic uncertainty, where the presence or absence of intra-abdominal pathology could not be ascertained. RESULTS: 12/85 (14.1%) of the unenhanced abdominal CT scans provided an uncertain result, compared with 14/101 (13.9%) of control cases performed with intravenous contrast (P = 0.96). There were also similar rates of positive and negative findings between the groups. CONCLUSION: Omitting intravenous contrast for abdominal CT in the setting of undifferentiated abdominal pain demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of diagnostic uncertainty. There are significant potential patient, fiscal and societal benefits as well as potential improvements to emergency department efficiency with the reduction of unnecessary intravenous contrast administration.

The use of whole-body trauma CT should be based on mechanism of injury: A risk analysis of 3920 patients at a tertiary trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Mechanism of injury (MOI) plays a significant role in a decision to perform whole-body computed tomography (CT) imaging for trauma patients. Various mechanisms have unique patterns of injury and therefore form an important variable in decision making. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all patients >18 years old who received a whole-body CT scan between 1 January 2019 and 19 February 2020. The outcomes were divided into CT 'positive' if any internal injuries were detected and CT 'negative' if no internal injuries were detected. The MOI, vital sign parameters, and other relevant clinical examination findings at presentation were recorded. RESULTS: 3920 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 1591 (40.6%) had a positive CT. The most common MOI was fall from standing height (FFSH), accounting for 23.0%, followed by motor vehicle accident (MVA), accounting for 22.4%. Covariates significantly associated with a positive CT included age, MVA >60 km/h, motor bike, bicycle, or pedestrian accident >30 km/h, prolonged extrication >30 min, fall from height above standing, penetrating chest or abdominal injury, as well as hypotension, neurological deficit, or hypoxia on arrival. FFSH was shown to reduce the risk of a positive CT overall, however, sub-analysis of FFSH in patients >65 years showed a significant association with a positive CT (OR 2.34, p < 0.001) compared to <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-arrival information including MOI and vital signs have significant impact on identifying subsequent injuries with CT imaging. In high energy trauma, we should consider the need for whole-body CT based on MOI alone regardless of the clinical examination findings. However, for low-energy trauma, including FFSH, in the absence of clinical examination findings which support an internal injury, a screening whole-body CT is unlikely to yield a positive result, particularly in the age group <65yo.

Mid-Arm Point in PAEDiatrics (MAPPAED): An effective procedural aid for safe pleural decompression in trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Life-threatening thoracic trauma requires emergency pleural decompression and thoracostomy and chest drain insertion are core trauma procedures. Reliably determining a safe site for pleural decompression in children can be challenging. We assessed whether the Mid-Arm Point (MAP) technique, a procedural aid proposed for use with injured adults, would also identify a safe site for pleural decompression in children. METHODS: Children (0-18 years) attending four EDs were prospectively recruited. The MAP technique was performed, and chest wall skin marked bilaterally at the level of the MAP; no pleural decompression was performed. Radio-opaque markers were placed over the MAP-determined skin marks and corresponding intercostal space (ICS) reported using chest X-ray. RESULTS: A total of 392 children participated, and 712 markers sited using the MAP technique were analysed. Eighty-three percentage of markers were sited within the 'safe zone' for pleural decompression (4th to 6th ICSs). When sited outside the 'safe zone', MAP-determined markers were typically too caudal. However, if the site for pleural decompression was transposed one ICS cranially in children ≥4 years, the MAP technique performance improved significantly with 91% within the 'safe zone'. CONCLUSIONS: The MAP technique reliably determines a safe site for pleural decompression in children, albeit with an age-based adjustment, the Mid-Arm Point in PAEDiatrics (MAPPAED) rule: 'in children aged ≥4 years, use the MAP and go up one ICS to hit the safe zone. In children <4 years, use the MAP.' When together with this rule, the MAP technique will identify a site within the 'safe zone' in 9 out of 10 children.

Interpretation of computed tomography of the cervical spine by non-radiologists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: After trauma, clearance of the cervical spine refers to the exclusion of underlying serious injuries. Accurate assessment of computed tomography (CT) is commonly required prior to clearance of the cervical spine. Delays to clearance can lead to prolonged immobilization with associated patient discomfort and adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to determine performance of non-radiologists to evaluate cervical spine CT. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library with sources of grey literature and reference lists of selected articles were appraised from inception to April 2021. We included manuscripts that reported discordance in CT cervical spine interpretation between non-radiologists and radiologists. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess quality of included studies and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: There were 43 studies identified for eligibility and 4 manuscripts included in the final analysis. There were two studies that reported on the performance of radiology residents, one study on the performance of surgical residents and one on emergency physicians. The pooled discordance was 0.25 (95%CI 0.21-0.28) but was lower for radiology residents (range 0.007-0.05). There was significant statistical heterogeneity (I2  = 99.6%, P < 0.001) among studies. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of evidence documenting the ability of non-radiologists in accurately interpreting CT of the cervical spine. A number of discordant findings suggest that studies with larger sample sizes are indicated to accurately ascertain the ability of non-radiologists in this area.

Radiological features of pulmonary fat embolism in trauma patients: a case series.

PURPOSE: Fat embolism syndrome (FES) is a rare complication in trauma patients (usually with long bone fractures) in which migrating medullary fat precipitates multiorgan dysfunction, classically presenting with dyspnoea, petechiae and neurocognitive dysfunction. Although this triad of symptoms is rare, it nonetheless aids diagnosis of pulmonary fat embolism (PuFE). Typical imaging features of PuFE are not established, although increasing use of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in this cohort may provide important diagnostic information. We therefore conducted a case series of FES patients with CTPA imaging at a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Medical records and various radiological investigations including CTPA of consecutive patients diagnosed clinically with FES between 2006 and 2018, including demographics, injury and their progress during their admission, were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen FES patients with retrievable CTPAs were included (mean age 31.2 years, range 17-69; 12 males [80%]). 93.3% had long bone fractures. CTPA was performed 2.00 ± 1.41 days post-admission. Review of these images showed pulmonary opacity in 14 (93.3%; ground-glass opacities in 9 [64.3%], alveolar opacities in 6 [42.9%]), interlobular septal thickening in 10 (66.7%), and pleural effusions in 7 (46.7%). Filling defects were identified in three (20%) CTPAs, with density measuring - 20HU to + 63HU. Ten patients (66.7%) had neuroimaging performed, with two patients demonstrating imaging findings consistent with cerebral fat emboli. CONCLUSION: CTPA features of PuFE are variable, with ground-glass parenchymal changes and septal thickening most commonly seen. Filling defects were uncommon.

Impact of COVID vaccination rollout on the use of computed tomography venography for the assessment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is rare; however, it has been observed in patients with vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia syndrome (VITT) following the use of adenovirus vector vaccines against COVID-19. Adverse vaccine effects have been heavily addressed in mainstream media, likely contributing to vaccination anxiety. This study aimed to assess how the vaccine rollout and media coverage has influenced the use of computed tomography venography (CTV) in an acute care setting of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Single-centre retrospective cohort study from 30 March 2021 to 13 June 2021. Direct comparison to same calendar dates in the preceding 3 years. RESULTS: In 2021, 57 patients received CTV with headache being the reason in 48 (84%) and 40 (70%) had received ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination). Only 20 of these patients received CTV after platelets and D-Dimer had returned, and only three patients met existing guidelines for imaging. Zero cases were positive. The number of CTV studies was 5.2 times than in 2020 and 2.7 times the mean number for the 3 preceding years. CONCLUSION: The use of CTV in patients with headache has markedly increased at our centre since negatively biased vaccination influence of mainstream media. Headache is a common vaccine-related side effect and VITT is exceptionably rare. With the rates of vaccination increasing in the community, these results highlight the importance of strict adherence to established evidence-based guidelines. Otherwise, critical care capacity, and in particular imaging resources already under pressure will be strained further.

Predicting fracture outcomes from clinical registry data using artificial intelligence supplemented models for evidence-informed treatment (PRAISE) study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius (wrist) fractures are the second most common fracture admitted to hospital. The anatomical pattern of these types of injuries is diverse, with variation in clinical management, guidelines for management remain inconclusive, and the uptake of findings from clinical trials into routine practice limited. Robust predictive modelling, which considers both the characteristics of the fracture and patient, provides the best opportunity to reduce variation in care and improve patient outcomes. This type of data is housed in unstructured data sources with no particular format or schema. The "Predicting fracture outcomes from clinical Registry data using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Supplemented models for Evidence-informed treatment (PRAISE)" study aims to use AI methods on unstructured data to describe the fracture characteristics and test if using this information improves identification of key fracture characteristics and prediction of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes following wrist fractures compared to prediction models based on standard registry data. METHODS AND DESIGN: Adult (16+ years) patients presenting to the emergency department, treated in a short stay unit, or admitted to hospital for >24h for management of a wrist fracture in four Victorian hospitals will be included in this study. The study will use routine registry data from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR), and electronic medical record (EMR) information (e.g. X-rays, surgical reports, radiology reports, images). A multimodal deep learning fracture reasoning system (DLFRS) will be developed that reasons on EMR information. Machine learning prediction models will test the performance with/without output from the DLFRS. DISCUSSION: The PRAISE study will establish the use of AI techniques to provide enhanced information about fracture characteristics in people with wrist fractures. Prediction models using AI derived characteristics are expected to provide better prediction of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following distal radius fracture.

Risk stratification of emergency department patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism: Is chest pain a reason to investigate?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to risk-stratify chest pain as a presenting symptom in patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) to assess for any association. In addition, this study aimed to assess traditionally acknowledged PE risk factors in an Australian population. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study assessing patients who presented to our emergency department during the period of 1 January 2019 to 1 January 2020. 730 consecutive patients who went on to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) examination after presentation were included. RESULTS: The rate of CTPA being positive in this study was 11.6% (85/730). Chest pain was associated with a non-significant reduction in the odds of PE (OR 0.774, P = 0.327). Univariate analysis showed significantly increased odds of a diagnosis of PE with presentation for leg pain/swelling (OR 6.670, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed increasing age (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.002-1.034, P = 0.024), clinical signs of a DVT (OR 3.194, 95% CI 1.803-5.657, P < 0.001) and positive D-dimer (OR 1.762, 95% CI 1.011-3.071, P = 0.046) were associated with increased odds of PE. CONCLUSION: In this study, Emergency Department presentation with chest pain, whilst the most common reason to perform a CTPA, resulted in reduced odds with regard to the diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism. The use of CTPA in this setting may be rationalised according to other factors such as localised leg pain as a symptom, signs of DVT, increasing age or positive D-dimer.

The status of radiation protection in medicine in the Asia-Pacific region.

More than half of the world's population live in Asia-Pacific. This region is culturally diverse, with significant disparities in terms of socio-economic status, provision of health care and access to advanced technology. The medical use of ionising radiation is increasing worldwide and similarly within the Asia-Pacific region. In this paper, we highlight the current status in usage of ionising radiation in medicine in the region, and review the legal framework, implementation and activities in radiation protection. Asia-Pacific countries are active in strengthening radiation protection by promoting education and training. Various projects and activities initiated by international organisations such as the IAEA, WHO and ICRP have provided stimulation in the region, but more work is needed to continue to improve protection practices.

Management of Australian Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Are Potentially Harmful Treatments Still Used?

Clinical trials have shown that intravenous albumin and decompressive craniectomy to treat early refractory intracranial hypertension can cause harm in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The extent to which these treatments remain in use is unknown. We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with severe TBI admitted to five neurotrauma centers across Australia between April 2013 and March 2015. Patients were identified from local trauma and intensive care unit (ICU) registries and followed until hospital discharge. Main outcome measures were the administration of intravenous albumin, and decompressive craniectomy for intracranial hypertension. Analyses were predominantly descriptive. There were 303 patients with severe TBI, of whom a minority received albumin (6.9%) or underwent early decompressive craniectomy for treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension complicating diffuse TBI (2.3%). The median (intequartile range [IQR]) age was 35 (24, 58), and most injuries were caused by road traffic accidents (57.4%) or falls (25.1%). Overall, 34.3% of patients died while in the hospital and the remainder were discharged to rehabilitation (44.6%), other health care facilities (4.6%), or home (16.5%). There were no patient characteristics significantly associated with use of albumin or craniectomy. Intravenous albumin and craniectomy for treatment of intracranial hypertension were used infrequently in Australian neurotrauma centers, indicating alignment between best available evidence and practice.

Technique, radiation safety and image quality for chest X-ray imaging through glass and in mobile settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has led to preparations within our hospital for an expected surge of patients. This included developing a technique to perform mobile chest X-ray imaging through glass, allowing the X-ray unit to remain outside of the patient's room, effectively reducing the cleaning time associated with disinfecting equipment. The technique also reduced the infection risk of radiographers. We assessed the attenuation of different types of glass in the hospital and the technique parameters required to account for the glass filtration and additional source to image distance (SID). Radiation measurements were undertaken in a simulated set-up to determine the appropriate position for staff inside and outside the room to ensure occupational doses were kept as low as reasonably achievable. Image quality was scored and technical parameter information collated. The alternative to imaging through glass is the standard portable chest X-ray within the room. The radiation safety requirements for this standard technique were also assessed. Image quality was found to be acceptable or borderline in 90% of the images taken through glass and the average patient dose was 0.02 millisieverts (mSv) per image. The majority (67%) of images were acquired at 110 kV, with an average 5.5 mAs and with SID ranging from 180 to 300 cm. With staff positioned at greater than 1 m from the patient and at more than 1 m laterally from the tube head outside the room to minimise scatter exposure, air kerma values did not exceed 0.5 microgray (µGy) per image. This method has been implemented successfully.

After-hours emergency radiology CT reporting by radiology registrars at an Australian level 1 trauma centre: A review of discrepancies between preliminary and final reports.

INTRODUCTION: There is reliance on radiology registrar reporting of after-hours CT scans in many public hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. This study evaluates the extent and nature of CT reporting discrepancies after-hours by comparing trainee preliminary reports with consultant finalised reports. METHODS: A retrospective review of all after-hours CT scans between January and December 2014 by radiology trainees at a level 1 trauma centre was performed. Discrepancies were classified as major or minor, by year level of trainee, time of report and scan type (Trauma vs. Non-Trauma). Major discrepancies were investigated to assess if they led to increased morbidity, mortality or a change in treatment. RESULTS: 17,948 after-hours CT scans were performed. A total of 1235 preliminary reports required addendums (discrepancy rate of 6.9%). There were 630 Trauma and 605 Non-Trauma studies. There were 56 major (0.3%) and 1179 minor (6.6%) discrepancies. Of the 56 major discrepancies there were 12 (0.3%) in the Trauma and 44 (6.6%) in the Non-Trauma groups. There were no adverse patient outcomes due to any major discrepancy. There were more minor discrepancies in reports of Trauma CTs compared to Non-Trauma (P ≤ 0.0001). No relationship between the time of report issued and discrepancy rate (P = 0.811) was observed. There was a lower discrepancy rate the more experienced the registrar from year 2 to advanced fellowship (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The discrepancy rates of after-hours CT trainee reports were lower at this institution compared to international literature (6.9% vs. 7.7%). The majority of preliminary trainee reports were accurate with no increased morbidity or mortality resulting from major discrepancies.

Clinical clearance of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In patients who are awake with normal mental and neurologic status, it has been suggested that the thoracolumbar (TL) spine may be cleared by clinical examination, irrespective of the mechanism of injury. The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and accuracy of a clinical decision tool focused towards clearance of the TL spine during assessment of patients in the emergency department after trauma. METHODS: A prospective interventional study was conducted at two major trauma centres. The intervention of a clinical decision tool for assessment of the TL spine was applied prospectively to all patients with subsequent imaging results acting as the comparator. The primary outcome variable was fracture of the thoracic or lumbar vertebra(e). The clinical decision tool was assessed using sensitivity and specificity for detecting a TL fracture and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There were 188 cases included for analysis that all underwent imaging of the thoracic and/or lumbar vertebrae. There were 34 (18%) patients diagnosed with fractures of the thoracic and/or lumbar vertebrae. In this pilot study, sensitivity of the clinical decision tool was 100% (95% CI 87.3-100%) and specificity was 37.0% (95% CI 29.5-45.2%) for the detection of a thoracic or lumbar vertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility of clinical clearance of the TL spine in two major trauma centres was demonstrated in a clinical study setting. Evaluation of this clinical decision tool in patients following blunt trauma, particularly in reducing imaging rates, is indicated using a larger prospective study.

Potentially preventable trauma deaths: A retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Reviewing prehospital trauma deaths provides an opportunity to identify system improvements that may reduce trauma mortality. The objective of this study was to identify the number and rate of potentially preventable trauma deaths through expert panel reviews of prehospital and early in-hospital trauma deaths. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prehospital and early in-hospital (<24 h) trauma deaths following a traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest that were attended by Ambulance Victoria (AV) in the state of Victoria, Australia, between 2008 and 2014. Expert panels were used to review cases that had resuscitation attempted by paramedics and underwent a full autopsy. Patients with a mechanism of hanging, drowning or those with anatomical injuries deemed to be unsurvivable were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 1183 cases that underwent full autopsies, resuscitation was attempted by paramedics in 336 (28%) cases. Of these, 113 cases (34%) were deemed to have potentially survivable injuries and underwent expert panel review. There were 90 (80%) deaths that were not preventable, 19 (17%) potentially preventable deaths and 4 (3%) preventable deaths. Potentially preventable or preventable deaths represented 20% of those cases that underwent review and 7% of cases that had attempted resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: The number of potentially preventable or preventable trauma deaths in the pre-hospital and early in-hospital resuscitation phase was low. Specific circumstances were identified in which the trauma system could be further improved.

Cost-Effectiveness of Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multinational Trial-Based Economic Analysis.

The EPO-TBI multi-national randomized controlled trial found that erythropoietin (EPO), when compared to placebo, did not affect 6-month neurological outcome, but reduced illness severity-adjusted mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), making the cost-effectiveness of EPO in TBI uncertain. The current study uses patient-level data from the EPO-TBI trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EPO in patients with moderate or severe TBI from the healthcare payers' perspective. We addressed the issue of transferability in multi-national trials by estimating costs and effects for specific geographical regions of the study (Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and Saudi Arabia). Unadjusted mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% confidence interval [CI]) at 6 months were 0.027 (0.020-0.034; p < 0.001) higher in the EPO group, with an adjusted QALY increment of 0.014 (0.000-0.028; p = 0.04). Mean unadjusted costs (95% CI) were $US5668 (-9191 to -2144; p = 0.002) lower in the treatment group; controlling for baseline IMPACT-TBI score and regional heterogeneity reduced this difference to $2377 (-12,446 to 7693; p = 0.64). For a willingness-to-pay threshold of $US50,000 per QALY, 71.8% of replications were considered cost-effective. Therefore, we did not find evidence that EPO was significantly cost-effective in the treatment of moderate or severe TBI at 6-month follow-up.