A survey of awareness of diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases among healthcare professionals and researchers in India.

Rare diseases (RDs) are those that affect a small fraction of the total population. In India, where resources are scarce, the healthcare infrastructure and policy framework are focused on mitigating diseases that affect a large number of people. As a result,many cases ofRDs remain unreported, undiagnosed, and untreated. To understandthe currentlevel of RD awareness among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and researchers, as they are key stakeholders in diagnosis, treatment, policy making, and drug development, we conducted a survey based on identification of an RD, time for diagnosis, treatment options, and relationship with family history and geographic location. The survey was divided into two parts, one for researchers and the other for healthcare professionals, each consisting of 22 questions. We observed that among all our respondents, 31% of researchers and 29% of HCPs did not know the time required for diagnosis of a rare disease they mentioned in the survey. They identified the importance of family history but failed to realize its association with geographic location. The results from the exploratory study can provide information for enabling larger studies to develop recommendations and policies that can improve awareness about RDs in healthcare communities.

On the Manufacturers of Biosimilars in Asia.

Over the past 2 decades, biosimilars have created an opportunity for access to affordable medicines globally. The development process includes robust analytical and functional comparability, equivalent pharmacokinetic profile, and demonstration of lack of any meaningful clinical differences. In this brief opinion article, we offer an overview of the major aspects that are involved in biosimilar development and regulatory requirements in Asia in order to facilitate a standardized process that can enable cost-effective development of biosimilars.

Immunogenicity, Efficacy, and Safety of Biosimilar Insulin Aspart (MYL-1601D) Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart (Novolog®) in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes After 24 Weeks: A Randomized Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: MYL-1601D is a proposed biosimilar of originator insulin aspart, Novolog®/NovoRapid® (Ref-InsAsp-US/Ref-InsAsp-EU). OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of MYL-1601D with Ref-InsAsp-US in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). METHODS: This was a 24-week, open-label, randomized, phase III study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to mealtime MYL-1601D or Ref-InsAsp-US in combination with insulin glargine (Lantus SoloSTAR®) once daily. The treatment-emergent antibody response (TEAR) rate (defined as patients who were anti-insulin antibody [AIA] negative at baseline and became positive at any timepoint post-baseline or patients who were AIA positive at baseline and demonstrated a 4-fold increase in titer values at any timepoint post-baseline) was the primary endpoint. The study also compared the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), prandial, basal, and total daily insulin, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) profiles, immunogenicity, and adverse events (AEs) including hypoglycemia. RESULTS: In total, 478 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis (MYL-1601D: 238; Ref-InsAsp-US: 240) set. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the primary endpoint was within the pre-defined equivalence margin of ±11.7% and the treatment differences (SE) in TEAR responders between the treatment groups was - 2.86 (4.16) with 90% CI - 9.71 to 3.99. The mean (SD) changes from baseline for HbA1c, FPG, and insulin dosages were similar in both groups at week 24. The safety profiles including hypoglycemia, immune-related events, AEs, and other reported variables were similar between the treatment groups at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: MYL-1601D demonstrated similar immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety profiles to Ref-InsAsp-US in patients with T1D over 24 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03760068.

Development and validation of a cell based assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against recombinant insulins.

Recombinant biopharmaceuticals can induce generation of anti-drug antibodies, which could potentially neutralize therapeutic drug activity. In this report, we describe development and validation of a cell-based assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies (Nab) against insulin and insulin analogues. In order to achieve clinically meaningful sensitivity the method used an early signalling event, insulin induced insulin receptor phosphorylation as the endpoint. Percentage insulin receptor phosphorylation in cell lysates was measured using ECL based ELISA. Presence of neutralizing antibodies (Nab) in samples will inhibit insulin induced receptor phosphorylation and consequently lead to a reduction in the percentage of phosphorylated insulin receptor. Additionally, usage of human insulin receptor overexpressing recombinant CHO cell line further improved the assay sensitivity by reducing the fixed drug (EC50) concentration used for induction of receptor phosphorylation. To ensure adequate free drug tolerance a pre-treatment step was introduced, where serum samples underwent acid dissociation and charcoal extraction before drug incubation. In order to distinguish ADA positive samples containing true Nab from samples containing non-antibody phosphorylation inhibitory serum factors, a confirmatory tier was integrated based on immunodepletion using protein AGL mix. Assay parameters including determination of screening and confirmatory cut-points, intra and inter assay precision, selectivity, specificity and stability were assessed during validation in accordance with recent regulatory guidelines and white papers. The advantage of selecting insulin receptor phosphorylation as assay endpoint made the assay capable of detecting Nab against insulin and insulin analogues.