Factors influencing time to seeking medical advice and onset of treatment in women who are diagnosed with breast cancer in Serbia.

OBJECTIVE: Streamlining the diagnosis is a key factor in improving the treatment outcomes for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine factors influencing time to seeking medical advice and treatment onset in women who are diagnosed with breast cancer in Serbia. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, cross-sectional national survey, performed at 10 oncology centers in Serbia. Time intervals spent throughout the complex diagnostic pathway were evaluated using a validated questionnaire administered to women with breast cancer (n = 800). Total interval (TI) was determined using predefined time scales, including one referring to patient interval (PI), and several related to health care system interval (SI). RESULTS: Mean PI, SI, and TI were 4.5, 9.2, and 12.9 weeks, respectively; 20% of patients had a PI>12 weeks. Based on the multivariate regression model, longer PI was associated with perceived lack of time and personal disregard or trivialization of detected symptoms and signs. Women who were supported by family members or friends and had at least a secondary level education tended to have a shorter PI. Longer PI was correlated with a longer SI, while regular self-examination, having been diagnosed by an oncologist, and living in a major city were associated with shorter SI. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors, related to psychological, demographic, behavioral, and health system characteristics, determined both the time to seeking medical advice and treatment onset for breast cancer. These findings support review and refining of national strategies and policies to promote early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer.

Primarily tamoxifen-unresponsive, steroid receptor-positive breast cancer may respond to an aromatase inhibition: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Breast carcinomas becoming tamoxifen-resistant after objective clinical response to antiestrogen therapy may remain responsive to other endocrine agents due to different mechanisms of action. The aim of our study was to analyze whether primarily tamoxifen-unresponsive/steroid receptor (SR) - positive breast carcinomas can respond to an aromatase inhibition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen postmenopausal, SR-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients were included: they had previously failed to respond to tamoxifen, either as primary systemic therapy for advanced disease, or as adjuvant treatment (5 and 8 patients, respectively). Patients were treated with 2.5 mg letrozole daily, from 2-25 months, mostly until disease progression. RESULTS: Partial response (PR) was obtained in one third of the patients (4/13); additionally, 3 patients showed disease stabilization (SD) longer than 6 months. The observed response duration lasted from 7 to 36+ months (median 9). Overall survival from the beginning of letrozole treatment was better in letrozole responders compared with nonresponders. It appeared as if there were two different subgroups of patients: one completely endocrine-unresponsive, and the other unresponsive to tamoxifen but responsive to letrozole (supposed to be primarily tamoxifen-resistant, but otherwise endocrine-responsive). HER-2 overexpression (immunohistochemically determined as 2+ and 3+) was found in 3 patients, which could not account for the different endocrine responsiveness. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that some SR-positive breast carcinomas, primarily tamoxifen-unresponsive, may respond to letrozole, thus being endocrine-responsive, while others did not respond, probably due to complete endocrine unresponsiveness. It is not likely that HER-2 was the biomarker that made the difference between these two subgroups.

Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin in doxorubicin-resistant advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

AIM: Twenty-two anthracycline-resistant advanced breast cancer patients were entered from June 1995 till November 1997 in a phase II study to assess the activity and tolerability of second-line chemotherapy consisting of mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were eligible if they failed to respond to doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy, given as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Treatment consisted of mitoxantrone, 12 mg/m2 iv infusion on day 1, and leucovorin, 50 mg iv 1 hr before 5-fluorouracil, 350 mg/m2 iv infusion on days 1-3, every three weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were eligible for response, 2 refused further therapy after 2 cycles, and 1 was excluded because grade 3 myelotoxicity developed during the first cycle. Partial remission of 15 months duration occurred in 1 patient, in 7/19 women disease remained stable with a median duration of 11 months (range, 5-24), and 11/19 patients experienced progressive disease. Median time to disease progression was 2 months (range, 0-17), and median survival was 8 months (range, 0-24). Toxicity was generally mild and acceptable. One patient was excluded because of grade 3 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, and one due to cardiotoxicity assessed by the drop of left ventricular ejection fraction to more than 20% below the initial value. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the very low objective response rate, almost one-fourth of our anthracycline-resistant patients achieved a disease stabilization of 27 weeks duration during mitoxantrone-based second-line chemotherapy. Hence, mitoxantrone in combination with 5-fluorouracil, especially continuous infusion, should be further investigated in this setting, particularly if new and expensive drugs, considered the most active, are not readily available.