Frequency of and Risk Factors Associated With Hospital Readmission After Sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: Although children who survive sepsis are at risk for readmission, identification of patient-level variables associated with readmission has been limited by administrative datasets. We determined frequency and cause of readmission within 90 days of discharge and identified patient-level variables associated with readmission using a large, electronic health record-based registry. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 3464 patients treated for sepsis or septic shock between January 2011 and December 2018 who survived to discharge at a single academic children's hospital. We determined frequency and cause of readmission through 90 days post-discharge and identified patient-level variables associated with readmission. Readmission was defined as inpatient treatment within 90 days post-discharge from a prior sepsis hospitalization. Outcomes were frequency of and reasons for 7-, 30-, and 90-day (primary) readmission. Patient variables were tested for independent associations with readmission using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Following index sepsis hospitalization, frequency of readmission at 7, 30, and 90 days was 7% (95% confidence interval 6%-8%), 20% (18%-21%), and 33% (31%-34%). Variables independently associated with 90-day readmission were age ≤ 1 year, chronic comorbid conditions, lower hemoglobin and higher blood urea nitrogen at sepsis recognition, and persistently low white blood cell count ≤ 2 thous/µL. These variables explained only a small proportion of overall risk (pseudo-R2 range 0.05-0.13) and had moderate predictive validity (area under the receiver operating curve range 0.67-0.72) for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Children who survive sepsis were frequently readmitted, most often for infections. Risk for readmission was only partly indicated by patient-level variables.

Creating a performance appraisal template for pharmacy technicians using the method of equal-appearing intervals.

OBJECTIVE: To design a highly quantitative template for the evaluation of community pharmacy technicians' job performance that enables managers to provide sufficient feedback and fairly allocate organizational rewards. DESIGN: Two rounds of interviews with two convenience samples of community pharmacists and pharmacy technicians were conducted. The interview in phase 1 was qualitative, and responses were used to design the second interview protocol. During the phase 2 interviews, a new group of respondents ranked technicians' job responsibilities, identified through the initial interviewees' responses, using scales the researchers had designed using an interval-level scaling technique called equal-appearing intervals. SETTING: Chain and independent pharmacies. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1-20 pharmacists and 20 technicians from chain and independent pharmacies; phase 2-20 pharmacists and 9 technicians from chain and independent pharmacies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of the importance of technician practice functions and corresponding responsibilities. RESULTS: Weights were calculated for each practice function. A weighted list of practice functions was developed, and this may serve as a performance evaluation template. Customer service-related activities were judged by pharmacists and technicians alike to be the most important technician functions. CONCLUSION: Many pharmacies either lack formal performance appraisal systems or fail to implement them properly. Technicians may desire more consistent feedback from pharmacists and value information that may lead to organizational rewards. Using a weighted, behaviorally anchored performance appraisal system may help pharmacists and pharmacy managers meet these demands.