RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with a tracheostomy and difficult weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation constitute a challenging problem in critical care. An increased duration of ventilation may lead to diaphragmatic dysfunction and a noninvasive assessment of the diaphragm, such as ultrasound, attracts interest in the clinical practice. We evaluated the relationship of ultrasound-derived indices with weaning outcome and with established indices of respiratory strength and load in subjects who are tracheostomized and undergoing weaning. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at an academic ICU in Greece. Twenty subjects with tracheostomy and difficult weaning, during a spontaneous breathing trial, underwent time synchronous diaphragmatic sonography and esophageal manometry, to assess diaphragmatic excursion and thickening fraction, esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressures, pressure-time product of the esophageal pressure, and maximum inspiratory pressure. The primary outcome was liberation from mechanical ventilation at 48 h. The relationship of diaphragmatic ultrasound with esophageal pressure-derived indices was also evaluated. RESULTS: Weaning from invasive ventilation failed in 10 subjects. Diaphragmatic excursion exhibited a significant difference between weaning success and failure (1.34 ± 0.56 versus 0.79 ± 0.44; P = .044), a strong correlation with transdiaphragmatic pressure (r = 0.7, P = .02), and a moderate correlation with the pressure-time product of the esophageal pressure (r = 0.65, P = .02) and the maximum inspiratory pressure (r = 0.66, P = .02). Transdiaphragmatic pressure presented the highest area under the curve (0.97). However, when transdiaphragmatic pressure was compared with diaphragmatic excursion (area under the curve, 0.84) for predictive accuracy, no significant difference was found. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic excursion is a valuable tool for the assessment of diaphragmatic strength, respiratory load, and weaning prediction.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiac injury is frequently reported in COVID-19 patients, the right ventricle (RV) is mostly affected. We systematically evaluated the cardiac function and longitudinal changes in severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and assessed the impact on survival. METHODS: We prospectively performed comprehensive echocardiographic analysis on mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients, using 2D/3D echocardiography. We defined left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction as ejection fraction (EF) < 40%, or longitudinal strain (LS) > - 18% and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction if two indices among fractional area change (FAC) < 35%, tricuspid annulus systolic plane excursion (TAPSE) < 1.6 cm, RV EF < 44%, RV-LS > - 20% were present. RV afterload was assessed from pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), PASP/Velocity Time Integral in the right ventricular outflow tract (VTIRVOT) and pulmonary acceleration time (PAcT). TAPSE/PASP assessed the right ventriculoarterial coupling (VACR). RESULTS: Among 176 patients included, RV dysfunction was common (69%) (RV-EF 41.1 ± 1.3%; RV-FAC 36.6 ± 0.9%, TAPSE 20.4 ± 0.4mm, RV-LS:- 14.4 ± 0.4%), usually accompanied by RV dilatation (RVEDA/LVEDA 0.82 ± 0.02). RV afterload was increased in most of the patients (PASP 33 ± 1.1 mmHg, PAcT 65.3 ± 1.5 ms, PASP/VTIRVOT, 2.29 ± 0.1 mmHg/cm). VACR was 0.8 ± 0.06 mm/mmHg. LV-EF < 40% was present in 21/176 (11.9%); mean LV-EF 57.8 ± 1.1%. LV-LS (- 13.3 ± 0.3%) revealed a silent LV impairment in 87.5%. A mild pericardial effusion was present in 70(38%) patients, more frequently in non-survivors (p < 0.05). Survivors presented significant improvements in respiratory physiology during the 10th ICU-day (PaO2/FiO2, 231.2 ± 11.9 vs 120.2 ± 6.7 mmHg; PaCO2, 43.1 ± 1.2 vs 53.9 ± 1.5 mmHg; respiratory system compliance-CRS, 42.6 ± 2.2 vs 27.8 ± 0.9 ml/cmH2O, all p < 0.0001). Moreover, survivors presented significant decreases in RV afterload (PASP: 36.1 ± 2.4 to 20.1 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.0001, PASP/VTIRVOT: 2.5 ± 1.4 to 1.1 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001 PAcT: 61 ± 2.5 to 84.7 ± 2.4 ms, p < 0.0001), associated with RV systolic function improvement (RVEF: 36.5 ± 2.9% to 46.6 ± 2.1%, p = 0.001 and RV-LS: - 13.6 ± 0.7% to - 16.7 ± 0.8%, p = 0.001). In addition, RV dilation subsided in survivors (RVEDA/LVEDA: 0.8 ± 0.05 to 0.6 ± 0.03, p = 0.001). Day-10 CRS correlated with RV afterload (PASP/VTIRVOT, r: 0.535, p < 0.0001) and systolic function (RV-LS, 0.345, p = 0.001). LV-LS during the 10th ICU-day, while ΔRV-LS and ΔPASP/RVOTVTI were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 improvements in RV function, RV afterload and RV-PA coupling at day 10 were associated with respiratory function and survival.
RESUMO
(1) Background: The optimal treatment of septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) remains questionable. The aim of the study was to compare the treatment of SCM based on levosimendan versus the best available therapy. (2) Methods: We conducted an observational study including patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy and circulatory failure. (3) Results: Fourteen patients (61%) received levosimendan, and nine received other treatments. The patients in the levosimendan group were more severely ill [APACHE II: 23.5 (14, 37) vs. 14 (13, 28), respectively, p = 0.012], and there was a trend for more decompensated LV function depicted by the LVEF [15% (10, 20) vs. 25% (5, 30), respectively, p = 0.061]. However, they presented a significantly higher increase in LVEF after seven days [15% (10, 20) to 50% (30, 68) (p < 0.0001) vs. 25% (5, 30) to 25% (15, 50) (p = 0.309), and a significantly higher decrease in lactate levels during the first 24 h [4.5 (2.5, 14.4) to 2.85 (1.2, 15), p = 0.036 vs. 2.9 (2, 18.9) to 2.8 (1, 15), p = 0.536]. Seven-day survival (64.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.424) and ICU survival (50% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.172) were higher in the first group, although differences did not reach statistical significance. The degree of left ventricular impairment and the magnitude of EF improvement by the seventh-day post-SCM onset were associated with mortality in regression analysis. (4) Conclusions: Our study presents main hemodynamic data supporting the possible efficacy of levosimendan treatment in patients with severe SCM.