Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36834286

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced urgent and unique challenges to family planning providers and staff in ensuring continued access to high-quality services, particularly for groups who experience greater barriers to accessing services, such as women with systemically marginalized identities and adolescents and young adults (AYA). While research has documented key adaptations made to service delivery during the early phase of the pandemic, limited studies have used qualitative methods. This paper draws on qualitative interview data from family planning providers and staff in Title-X-funded clinics and school-based clinics-two settings that serve populations that experience greater barriers to accessing care-to (a) describe the adaptations made to service delivery during the first year of the pandemic and (b) explore provider and staff experiences and impressions implementing these adaptations. In-depth interviews were conducted with 75 providers and staff between February 2020 and February 2021. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed via inductive content analysis followed by thematic analysis. Four key themes were identified: (1) Title-X- and school-based staff made multiple, concurrent adaptations to continue family planning services; (2) providers embraced flexibility for patient-centered care; (3) school-based staff faced unique challenges to reaching and serving youth; and (4) COVID-19 created key opportunities for innovation. The findings suggest several lasting changes to family planning service delivery and provider mindsets at clinics serving populations hardest hit by the pandemic. Future studies should evaluate promising practices in family planning service delivery-including telehealth and streamlined administrative procedures-and explore how these are experienced by diverse patient populations, particularly AYA and those in areas where privacy or internet access are limited.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Adolescente , Humanos , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Pandemias , Educação Sexual
2.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0213605, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30883583

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Modeling contributes to health program planning by allowing users to estimate future outcomes that are otherwise difficult to evaluate. However, modeling results are often not easily translated into practical policies. This paper examines the barriers and enabling factors that can allow models to better inform health decision-making. DESCRIPTION: The Decision Makers' Program Planning Tool (DMPPT) and its successor, DMPPT 2, are illustrative examples of modeling tools that have been used to inform health policy. Their use underpinned Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) scale-up for HIV prevention in southern and eastern Africa. Both examine the impact and cost-effectiveness of VMMC scale-up, with DMPPT used initially in global advocacy and DMPPT 2 then providing VMMC coverage estimates by client age and subnational region for use in country-specific program planning. Their application involved three essential steps: identifying and engaging a wide array of stakeholders from the outset, reaching consensus on key assumptions and analysis plans, and convening data validation meetings with critical stakeholders. The subsequent DMPPT 2 Online is a user-friendly tool for in-country modeling analyses and continuous program planning and monitoring. LESSONS LEARNED: Through three iterations of the DMPPT applied to VMMC, a comprehensive framework with six steps was identified: (1) identify a champion, (2) engage stakeholders early and often, (3) encourage consensus, (4) customize analyses, (5), build capacity, and (6) establish a plan for sustainability. This framework could be successfully adapted to other HIV prevention programs to translate modeling results to policy and programming. CONCLUSIONS: Models can be used to mobilize support, strategically plan, and monitor key programmatic elements, but they can also help inform policy environments in which programs are conceptualized and implemented to achieve results. The ways in which modeling has informed VMMC programs and policy may be applicable to an array of other health interventions.


Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Programas Voluntários , Adolescente , Adulto , África Oriental , África Austral , Criança , Circuncisão Masculina/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Adulto Jovem
3.
PLoS One ; 12(9): e0184484, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28926568

RESUMO

Engaging key populations, including gender and sexual minorities, is essential to meeting global targets for reducing new HIV infections and improving the HIV continuum of care. Negative attitudes toward gender and sexual minorities serve as a barrier to political will and effective programming for HIV health services. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), established in 2003, provided Gender and Sexual Diversity Trainings for 2,825 participants including PEPFAR staff and program implementers, U.S. government staff, and local stakeholders in 38 countries. The outcomes of these one-day trainings were evaluated among a subset of participants using a mixed methods pre- and post-training study design. Findings suggest that sustainable decreases in negative attitudes toward gender and sexual minorities are achievable with a one-day training.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Saúde Global , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Educação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Autoeficácia
6.
Glob Public Health ; 12(2): 185-199, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26256402

RESUMO

Limited research has examined the social context surrounding stigma and discrimination and HIV outcomes among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We surveyed 900 PLHIV in Brazil and examined the relationship between stigma, discrimination and HIV outcomes utilising multivariable logistic regression. HIV stigma and discrimination were inversely associated with age (AOR Stigma 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.88; AOR Discrimination 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95) and income (AOR Stigma 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99; AOR Discrimination 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.82). Stigma was inversely associated with education (AOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96) and no history of sex work (AOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.90), and positively associated with having children (AOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.18-2.48). Discrimination was inversely associated with no history of drug use (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95). Stigma and discrimination were found to be inversely associated with overall health (AOR Stigma 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.74; AOR Discrimination 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97). Discrimination was associated with having a sexually transmitted infection since HIV diagnosis (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.32). Findings suggest that future interventions should address multiple social inequalities faced by PLHIV to reduce HIV stigma and discrimination and improve health and HIV outcomes.


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/tendências , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Profissionais do Sexo , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Estigma Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Análise de Variância , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/estatística & dados numéricos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/economia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Autoimagem , Profissionais do Sexo/psicologia , Profissionais do Sexo/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
7.
Torture ; 26(1): 17-44, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27857003

RESUMO

This research describes the development and findings of a literature review and analysis meant to inform the international torture and trauma treatment community. The review focuses on interventions that have been used among populations affected by torture, based on a review of journals indexed in commonly used search engines. Work on the review began in September 2008 and continued to be updated until March 2014. In total, 88 studies of interventions for torture victims were identified. Studies ranged from randomized controlled trials utilizing evidence-based treatments to case studies employing non-structured, supportive therapies. Based on the results of the analysis, we have included recommendations for interventions that demonstrate effectiveness in treating survivors of torture and other systematic violence who suffer from PTSD, depression and anxiety. Priorities for mental health research for survivors of torture and other systematic violence are also recommended.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/terapia , Depressão/terapia , Psicoterapia , Pesquisa , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Tortura/psicologia , Violência/psicologia , Adulto , Ansiedade/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
PLoS One ; 11(7): e0157071, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27409079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2012, South Africa set a goal of circumcising 4.3 million men ages 15-49 by 2016. By the end of March 2014, 1.9 million men had received voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). In an effort to accelerate progress, South Africa undertook a modeling exercise to determine whether circumcising specific client age groups or geographic locations would be particularly impactful or cost-effective. Results will inform South Africa's efforts to develop a national strategy and operational plan for VMMC. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study team populated the Decision Makers' Program Planning Tool, Version 2.0 (DMPPT 2.0) with HIV incidence projections from the Spectrum/AIDS Impact Module (AIM), as well as national and provincial population and HIV prevalence estimates. We derived baseline circumcision rates from the 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey. The model showed that circumcising men ages 20-34 offers the most immediate impact on HIV incidence and requires the fewest circumcisions per HIV infection averted. The greatest impact over a 15-year period is achieved by circumcising men ages 15-24. When the model assumes a unit cost increase with client age, men ages 15-29 emerge as the most cost-effective group. When we assume a constant cost for all ages, the most cost-effective age range is 15-34 years. Geographically, the program is cost saving in all provinces; differences in the VMMC program's cost-effectiveness across provinces were obscured by uncertainty in HIV incidence projections. CONCLUSION: The VMMC program's impact and cost-effectiveness vary by age-targeting strategy. A strategy focusing on men ages 15-34 will maximize program benefits. However, because clients older than 25 access VMMC services at low rates, South Africa could consider promoting demand among men ages 25-34, without denying services to those in other age groups. Uncertainty in the provincial estimates makes them insufficient to support geographic targeting.


Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina/economia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Voluntários/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Circuncisão Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Prevalência , Software , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
PLoS One ; 11(7): e0158693, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27410234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uganda aims to provide safe male circumcision (SMC) to 80% of men ages 15-49 by 2016. To date, only 2 million men have received SMC of the 4.2 million men required. In response to age and regional trends in SMC uptake, the country sought to re-examine its targets with respect to age and subnational region, to assess the program's progress, and to refine the implementation approach. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Decision Makers' Program Planning Tool, Version 2.0 (DMPPT 2.0), was used in conjunction with incidence projections from the Spectrum/AIDS Impact Module (AIM) to conduct this analysis. Population, births, deaths, and HIV incidence and prevalence were used to populate the model. Baseline male circumcision prevalence was derived from the 2011 AIDS Indicator Survey. Uganda can achieve the most immediate impact on HIV incidence by circumcising men ages 20-34. This group will also require the fewest circumcisions for each HIV infection averted. Focusing on men ages 10-19 will offer the greatest impact over a 15-year period, while focusing on men ages 15-34 offers the most cost-effective strategy over the same period. A regional analysis showed little variation in cost-effectiveness of scaling up SMC across eight regions. Scale-up is cost-saving in all regions. There is geographic variability in program progress, highlighting two regions with low baseline rates of circumcision where additional efforts will be needed. CONCLUSION: Focusing SMC efforts on specific age groups and regions may help to accelerate Uganda's SMC program progress. Policy makers in Uganda have already used model outputs in planning efforts, proposing males ages 10-34 as a priority group for SMC in the 2014 application to the Global Fund's new funding model. As scale-up continues, the country should also consider a greater effort to expand SMC in regions with low MC prevalence.


Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Geografia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Uganda/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA