Results From a Proficiency Testing Pilot for Immunosuppressant Microsampling Assays.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressive drugs is important for the prevention of allograft rejection in transplant patients. Several hospitals offer a microsampling service that provides patients the opportunity to sample a drop of blood from a fingerprick at home that can then be sent to the laboratory by mail. The aim of this study was to pilot an external quality control program. METHODS: Fourteen laboratories from 7 countries participated (fully or partly) in 3 rounds of proficiency testing for the immunosuppressants tacrolimus, ciclosporin, everolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolic acid. The microsampling devices included the following: Whatman 903 and DMPK-C, HemaXis, Mitra, and Capitainer-B. All assays were based on liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. In round 2, microsamples as well as liquid whole blood samples were sent, and 1 of these samples was a patient sample. RESULTS: Imprecision CV% values for the tacrolimus microsamples reported by individual laboratories ranged from 13.2% to 18.2%, 11.7%-16.3%, and 12.2%-18.6% for rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For liquid whole blood (round 2), the imprecision CV% values ranged from 3.9%-4.9%. For the other immunosuppressants, the results were similar. A great variety in analytical procedures was observed, especially the extraction method. For the patient sample, the microsample results led to different clinical decisions compared with that of the whole blood sample. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressant microsampling methods show great interlaboratory variation compared with whole blood methods. This variation can influence clinical decision-making. Thus, harmonization and standardization are needed. Proficiency testing should be performed regularly for laboratories that use immunosuppressant microsampling techniques in patient care.

Best Practices to Implement Dried Blood Spot Sampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Sampling of blood at home to determine the concentration of drugs or other compounds can be effective in limiting hospital-based sampling. This could lower hospital visits and patient burden, improve the quality of life, and reduce health care costs. Dried blood spot (DBS) microsampling is often used for this purpose, wherein capillary blood, obtained by pricking the heel or finger, is used to measure different analytes. Although DBS has several advantages over venous blood sampling, it is not routinely implemented in clinical practice. To facilitate the bench to bedside transition, it is important to be aware of certain challenges that need to be considered and addressed. RESULTS: Here, important considerations regarding the implementation of DBS in clinical practice, the choice of patients, blood sampling, transport, and laboratory analysis are discussed. In addition, we share our experience and provide suggestions on how to deal with these problems in a clinical setting.

Alternative Sampling Devices to Collect Dried Blood Microsamples: State-of-the-Art.

ABSTRACT: Dried blood spots (DBS) have been used in newborn screening programs for several years. More recently, there has been growing interest in using DBS as a home sampling tool for the quantitative determination of analytes. However, this presents challenges, mainly because of the well-known hematocrit effect and other DBS-specific parameters, including spotted volume and punch site, which could add to the method uncertainty. Therefore, new microsampling devices that quantitatively collect capillary dried blood are continuously being developed. In this review, we provided an overview of devices that are commercially available or under development that allow the quantitative (volumetric) collection of dried blood (-based) microsamples and are meant to be used for home or remote sampling. Considering the field of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), we examined different aspects that are important for a device to be implemented in clinical practice, including ease of patient use, technical performance, and ease of integration in the workflow of a clinical laboratory. Costs related to microsampling devices are briefly discussed, because this additionally plays an important role in the decision-making process. Although the added value of home sampling for TDM and the willingness of patients to perform home sampling have been demonstrated in some studies, real clinical implementation is progressing at a slower pace. More extensive evaluation of these newly developed devices, not only analytically but also clinically, is needed to demonstrate their real-life applicability, which is a prerequisite for their use in the field of TDM.

Flucloxacillin decreases tacrolimus blood trough levels: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Tacrolimus and everolimus are widely used to prevent allograft rejection. Both are metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP3A4 and are substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Drugs influencing the activity or expression of CYP enzymes and P-gp can cause clinically relevant changes in the metabolism of immunosuppressants. Several case reports have reported that flucloxacillin appeared to decrease levels of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 and P-gp. The magnitude of this decrease has not been reported yet. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared the tacrolimus and everolimus blood trough levels (corrected for the dose) before, during, and after flucloxacillin treatment in eleven transplant patients (tacrolimus n = 11 patients, everolimus n = 1 patient, flucloxacillin n = 11 patients). RESULTS: The median tacrolimus blood trough level decreased by 37.5% (interquartile range, IQR 26.4-49.7%) during flucloxacillin treatment. After discontinuation of flucloxacillin, the tacrolimus blood trough levels increased by a median of 33.7% (IQR 22.5-51.4%). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed statistically significantly lower tacrolimus trough levels during treatment with flucloxacillin compared with before (p = 0.009) and after flucloxacillin treatment (p = 0.010). In the only available case with concomitant everolimus and flucloxacillin treatment, the same pattern was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Flucloxacillin decreases tacrolimus trough levels, possibly through a CYP3A4 and/or P-gp-inducing effect. It is strongly recommended to closely monitor tacrolimus and everolimus trough levels during flucloxacillin treatment and up to 2 weeks after discontinuation of flucloxacillin.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling and dried blood spot microsampling vs. conventional venous sampling for tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring.

Objectives Monitoring tacrolimus blood concentrations is important for preventing allograft rejection in transplant patients. Our hospital offers dried blood spot (DBS) sampling, giving patients the opportunity to sample a drop of blood from a fingerprick at home, which can be sent to the laboratory by mail. In this study, both a volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) device and DBS sampling were compared to venous whole blood (WB) sampling. Methods A total of 130 matched fingerprick VAMS, fingerprick DBS and venous WB samples were obtained from 107 different kidney transplant patients by trained phlebotomists for method comparison using Passing-Bablok regression. Bias was assessed using Bland-Altman. A multidisciplinary team pre-defined an acceptance limit requiring >80% of all matched samples within 15% of the mean of both samples. Sampling quality was evaluated for both VAMS and DBS samples. Results 32.3% of the VAMS samples and 6.2% of the DBS samples were of insufficient quality, leading to 88 matched samples fit for analysis. Passing-Bablok regression showed a significant difference between VAMS and WB, with a slope of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.97) but not for DBS (slope 1.00; 95% CI 0.95-1.04). Both VAMS (after correction for the slope) and DBS showed no significant bias in Bland-Altman analysis. For VAMS and DBS, the acceptance limit was met for 83.0% and 96.6% of the samples, respectively. Conclusions VAMS sampling can replace WB sampling for tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring, but VAMS sampling is currently inferior to DBS sampling, both regarding sample quality and agreement with WB tacrolimus concentrations.

Effects, costs and implementation of monitoring kidney transplant patients' tacrolimus levels with dried blood spot sampling: A randomized controlled hybrid implementation trial.

AIMS: Dried blood spot (DBS) home sampling allows monitoring creatinine levels and tacrolimus trough levels as an alternative for blood sampling in the hospital, which is important in kidney transplant patient follow-up. This study aims to assess whether DBS home sampling results in decreased patient travel burden and lower societal costs. METHODS: In this single-centre randomized controlled hybrid implementation trial, adult kidney transplant patients were enrolled. The intervention group (n = 25) used DBS home sampling on top of usual care in the first 6 months after transplantation. The control group (n = 23) received usual care only. The primary endpoint was the number of outpatient visits. Other endpoints were costs per patient, patient satisfaction and implementation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the average number of outpatient visits between the DBS group (11.2, standard deviation: 1.7) and the control group (10.9, standard deviation: 1.4; P = .48). Average costs per visit in the DBS group were not significantly different (€542, 95% confidence interval €316-990) compared to the control group (€533, 95% confidence interval €278-1093; P = .66). Most patients (n = 19/23, 82.6%) were willing to perform DBS home-sampling if this would reduce the number of hospital visits. Only 55.9% (n = 143/256) of the expected DBS samples were received and 1/5 analysed on time (n = 52/256). CONCLUSION: Adult kidney transplant patients are willing to perform DBS home sampling. However, to decrease patient travel burden and costs in post-transplant care, optimization of the logistical process concerning mailing and analysis of DBS samples is crucial.

Performance of a web-based application measuring spot quality in dried blood spot sampling.

Background The dried blood spot (DBS) method allows patients and researchers to collect blood on a sampling card using a skin-prick. An important issue in the application of DBSs is that samples for therapeutic drug monitoring are frequently rejected because of poor spot quality, leading to delayed monitoring or missing data. We describe the development and performance of a web-based application (app), accessible on smartphones, tablets or desktops, capable of assessing DBS quality at the time of sampling by means of analyzing a picture of the DBS. Methods The performance of the app was compared to the judgment of experienced laboratory technicians for samples obtained in a trained and untrained setting. A robustness- and user test were performed. Results In a trained setting the app yielded an adequate decision in 90.0% of the cases with 4.1% false negatives (insufficient quality DBSs incorrectly not rejected) and 5.9% false positives (sufficient quality DBSs incorrectly rejected). In an untrained setting this was 87.4% with 5.5% false negatives and 7.1% false positives. A patient user test resulted in a system usability score of 74 out of 100 with a median time of 1 min and 45 s to use the app. Robustness testing showed a repeatability of 84%. Using the app in a trained and untrained setting improves the amount of sufficient quality samples from 80% to 95.9% and 42.2% to 87.9%, respectively. Conclusions The app can be used in trained and untrained setting to decrease the amount of insufficient quality DBS samples.

Official International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Guideline: Development and Validation of Dried Blood Spot-Based Methods for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Dried blood spot (DBS) analysis has been introduced more and more into clinical practice to facilitate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). To assure the quality of bioanalytical methods, the design, development and validation needs to fit the intended use. Current validation requirements, described in guidelines for traditional matrices (blood, plasma, serum), do not cover all necessary aspects of method development, analytical- and clinical validation of DBS assays for TDM. Therefore, this guideline provides parameters required for the validation of quantitative determination of small molecule drugs in DBS using chromatographic methods, and to provide advice on how these can be assessed. In addition, guidance is given on the application of validated methods in a routine context. First, considerations for the method development stage are described covering sample collection procedure, type of filter paper and punch size, sample volume, drying and storage, internal standard incorporation, type of blood used, sample preparation and prevalidation. Second, common parameters regarding analytical validation are described in context of DBS analysis with the addition of DBS-specific parameters, such as volume-, volcano- and hematocrit effects. Third, clinical validation studies are described, including number of clinical samples and patients, comparison of DBS with venous blood, statistical methods and interpretation, spot quality, sampling procedure, duplicates, outliers, automated analysis methods and quality control programs. Lastly, cross-validation is discussed, covering changes made to existing sampling- and analysis methods. This guideline of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology on the development, validation and evaluation of DBS-based methods for the purpose of TDM aims to contribute to high-quality micro sampling methods used in clinical practice.

Quality Assessment of Dried Blood Spots from Patients With Tuberculosis from 4 Countries.

BACKGROUND: Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a blood collection tool that uses a finger prick to obtain a blood drop on a DBS card. It can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring, a method that uses blood drug concentrations to optimize individual treatment. DBS sampling is believed to be a simpler way of blood collection compared with venous sampling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of DBSs from patients with tuberculosis all around the world based on quality indicators in a structured assessment procedure. METHODS: Total 464 DBS cards were obtained from 4 countries: Bangladesh, Belarus, Indonesia, and Paraguay. The quality of the DBS cards was assessed using a checklist consisting of 19 questions divided into 4 categories: the integrity of the DBS materials, appropriate drying time, blood volume, and blood spot collection. RESULTS: After examination, 859 of 1856 (46%) blood spots did not comply with present quality criteria. In 625 cases (34%), this was due to incorrect blood spot collection. The DBS cards from Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Paraguay seemed to be affected by air humidity, causing the blood spots not to dry appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: New tools to help obtain blood spots of sufficient quality are necessary and environmental specific recommendations to determine plasma concentration correctly. In addition, 3% of the DBS cards were rejected because the integrity of the materials suggesting that the quality of plastic ziplock bags currently used to protect the DBS cards against contamination and humidity may not be sufficient.

Clinical application of a dried blood spot assay for sirolimus and everolimus in transplant patients.

Background Monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs such as everolimus and sirolimus is important in allograft rejection prevention in transplant patients. Dried blood spots (DBS) sampling gives patients the opportunity to sample a drop of blood from a fingerprick at home, which can be sent to the laboratory by mail. Methods A total of 39 sirolimus and 44 everolimus paired fingerprick DBS and whole blood (WB) samples were obtained from 60 adult transplant patients for method comparison using Passing-Bablok regression. Bias was assessed using Bland-Altman. Two validation limits were pre-defined: limits of analytical acceptance were set at >67% of all paired samples within 20% of the mean of both samples and limits of clinical relevance were set in a multidisciplinary team at >80% of all paired samples within 15% of the mean of both samples. Results For both sirolimus and everolimus, Passing-Bablok regression showed no differences between WB and DBS with slopes of 0.86 (95% CI slope, 0.72-1.02) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.84-1.06), respectively. Only everolimus showed a significant constant bias of 4%. For both sirolimus and everolimus, limits of analytical acceptance were met (76.9% and 81.8%, respectively), but limits or clinical relevance were not met (77.3% and 61.5%, respectively). Conclusions Because pre-defined limits of clinical relevance were not met, this DBS sampling method for sirolimus and everolimus cannot replace WB sampling in our center at this time. However, if the clinical setting is compatible with less strict limits for clinical relevance, this DBS method is suitable for clinical application.

A volumetric absorptive microsampling LC-MS/MS method for five immunosuppressants and their hematocrit effects.

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a LC-MS/MS assay for tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, cyclosporin A and mycophenolic acid using volumetric absorptive microsampling tips as a sampling device and to investigate the effect on the recoveries of the analyte concentration in combination with the hematocrit (HT), which included temsirolimus (a structural analog). Results: The maximum observed overall bias was 9.6% for the sirolimus LLOQ, while the maximum overall coefficient of variation was 8.3% for the everolimus LLOQ. All five immunosuppressants demonstrated to be stable in the volumetic absorbtive microsampling tips for at least 14 days at 25°C. Biases caused by HT effects were within 15% for all immunosuppressants between HT levels of 0.20 and 0.60 l/l, except for cyclosporin A, which was valid between 0.27 and 0.60 l/l. Reduced recoveries were observed at high analyte concentrations in combination with low HT values for sirolimus, everolimus and temsirolimus. Conclusion: A robust extraction and analysis method in volumetric absorptive microsampling tips was developed and fully validated. HT- and concentration-related recovery effects were observed but were within requirements of the purpose of the analytical method.

Dried blood spot validation of five immunosuppressants, without hematocrit correction, on two LC-MS/MS systems.

AIM: Hematocrit (Ht) effects remain a challenge in dried blood spot (DBS) sampling. The aim was to develop an immunosuppressant DBS assay on two LC-MS/MS systems covering a clinically relevant Ht range without Ht correction. RESULTS: The method was partially validated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, cyclosporin A and fully validated for mycophenolic acid on an Agilent and Thermo LC-MS/MS system. Bias caused by Ht effects were within 15% for all immunosuppressants between Ht levels of 0.23 and 0.48 l/l. Clinical validation of DBS versus whole blood samples for tacrolimus and cyclosporin A showed no differences between the two matrices. CONCLUSION: A multiple immunosuppressant DBS method without Ht correction, has been validated, including a clinical validation for tacrolimus and cyclosporin A, making this procedure suitable for home sampling.

Clinical Validation of Simultaneous Analysis of Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine A, and Creatinine in Dried Blood Spots in Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of creatinine and immunosuppressive drug concentrations, such as tacrolimus (TaC) and cyclosporin A (CsA), is important in the outpatient follow-up of kidney transplant recipients. Monitoring by dried blood spot (DBS) provides patients the opportunity to sample a drop of blood from a fingerprick at home, which can be sent to the laboratory by mail. METHODS: We performed a clinical validation in which we compared measurements from whole-blood samples obtained by venapuncture with measurements from DBS samples simultaneously obtained by fingerprick. After exclusion of 10 DBS for poor quality, and 2 for other reasons, 199, 104, and 58 samples from a total of 172 patients were available for validation of creatinine, TaC and CsA, respectively. Validation was performed by means of Passing & Bablok regression, and bias was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: For creatinine, we found y = 0.73x - 1.55 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] slope, 0.71-0.76), giving the conversion formula: (creatinine plasma concentration in µmol/L) = (creatinine concentration in DBS in µmol/L)/0.73, with a nonclinically relevant bias of -2.1 µmol/L (95% CI, -3.7 to -0.5 µmol/L). For TaC, we found y = 1.00x - 0.23 (95% CI slope, 0.91-1.08), with a nonclinically relevant bias of -0.28 µg/L (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.12 µg/L). For CsA, we found y = 0.99x - 1.86 (95% CI slope, 0.91-1.08) and no significant bias. Therefore, for neither TaC nor CsA, a conversion formula is required. CONCLUSIONS: DBS sampling for the simultaneous analysis of immunosuppressants and creatinine can replace conventional venous sampling in daily routine.