Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Perit Dial Int ; 36(5): 519-25, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044794

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: ♦ INTRODUCTION: This study was carried out to investigate the center effect on the risk of peritoneal dialysis (PD) failure within the first 6 months of therapy using a multilevel approach. ♦ METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study based on data from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry. We analyzed 5,406 incident patients starting PD between January 2008 and December 2012 in 128 PD centers. The end of the observation period was December 31, 2013. ♦ RESULTS: Of the 5,406 patients, 415 stopped PD within the first 6 months. There was a significant heterogeneity between centers (variance of the random effect: 0.10). Only 3% of the variance of the event of interest was attributable to differences between centers. At the individual level, only treatment before PD (odds ratio [OR]: 1.93 for hemodialysis and OR: 2.29 for renal transplantation) and underlying nephropathy (p < 0.01) were associated with early PD failure. At the center level, only center experience was associated (OR: 0.78) with the risk of PD failure. Center effect accounted for 52% of the disparities between centers. ♦ CONCLUSION: Center effect on early PD failure is significant. Center experience is associated with a lower risk of transfer to hemodialysis.


Assuntos
Unidades Hospitalares de Hemodiálise/organização & administração , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , França , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Peritonite/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 22(4): 1218-23, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17267540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In France, 48% of home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients require assistance to perform their exchange and manage their treatment. A total of 7% are aided by their family, and 41% by a private nurse. Of all the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, 61.7%, and among automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients 23%, are assisted at home for their bag exchanges and connections. Assisted APD patients (AAPD) are more comorbid and elderly so that a home helper is not always available: this explains why most helpers at home are private visiting nurses paid by the National Social Security. In addition to the home helper (nurse or family), 58% of centres make regular additional home visits to check the respect of procedures previously taught during the initial training of the nurse or the family helper. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the type of home assistance received by dependent patients had an influence on peritonitis rates, and if home visits done by nurses of training centres may improve results. METHODS: Peritonitis rates and the probability of being peritonitis free were analysed for 1624 new APD patients recorded in the French PD Registry (RDPLF) between 2000 and 2004, and followed-up until early 2005. RESULTS: Nurse-assisted APD patients had a peritonitis rate of one episode every 36 months, and family-assisted patients one episode every 45 months; using Poisson analysis this trend was not significant (P=0.11). However, the probability of being peritonitis free was significantly higher for family-assisted (69.8% at 2 year) compared with home nurse-aided persons (54.4%) after adjustment for age, diabetes and the Charlson comorbidity index. This difference disappeared when nurses from the training centre regularly visited PD patients at their home in the presence of their helper, whichever type of assistance they received. In addition, when the nurses from the training centres visited private nurse-assisted patients, the probability of being peritonitis free was significantly improved in comparison with those persons who did not receive home visits, from 33.9% to 50.8% at 3 years (P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: APD patients assisted at home by a private nurse have a higher risk of developing peritonitis than family-assisted patients, unless additional regular home visits are organized by the original training centre. Therefore, we recommend that home visits be regularly made for dependent PD patients to optimize the quality of care provided by the helper.


Assuntos
Hemodiálise no Domicílio/efeitos adversos , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/enfermagem , Assistência Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/enfermagem , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Assistência Domiciliar/normas , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA