Yield of Gluten Challenge in Patients on Self-Prescribed Gluten-Free Diets.

BACKGROUND: Patients on a gluten-free diet (GFD) whose celiac disease (CD) status is unknown may undergo gluten challenge (GC) to clarify their diagnosis. Though this is an established diagnostic practice, the proportion of patients undergoing GC who are diagnosed with CD is unknown. AIMS: We aimed to analyze which factors were predictive of having CD in a cohort of patients who underwent GC followed by upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy. METHODS: We identified adult patients at a CD referral center who had been on a GFD and then underwent GC to determine a diagnosis of CD during the years spanning 2006 to 2020. We compared those patients found to have CD (defined as villus atrophy/Marsh 3) on duodenal biopsy with those who did not, using the chi square and Fischer exact tests. RESULTS: We identified 206 patients who underwent GC. Of these 206, 30 (14%) were diagnosed with CD based on post-GC duodenal biopsy. 176 of the 206 (85%) patients reported various gastrointestinal symptoms, including bloating (39%), though these were more common in those without CD (any GI symptoms: 89% vs 67%, p 0.004; bloating: 43% vs 20%, p 0.019). Serology values, when normalized, including pre- and post-challenge TTG IgA (37% vs 1.7%, p 0.001; 23% versus 2.3%, p 0.001), DGP IgG and IgA (57% vs 2.8%, p 0.001; 37% vs 6.2%, p 0.001) were higher in the group of patients with CD. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing GC for diagnostic purposes, only 14% had evidence of villus atrophy corresponding with CD on duodenal biopsy. The presence of any elevated pre-challenge serology was associated with CD. Bloating in combination with low serologies may help risk stratify patients as being less likely to have CD upon GC.

A Telemonitoring Intervention for Cirrhotic Ascites Management Is Cost-Saving.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites experience frequent hospital admissions, leading to poor quality of life and high healthcare costs. Monitoring weight is a component of ascites care and telemonitoring may improve outcomes and costs. Goals We aimed to evaluate the cost and outcomes of current care compared to a telemonitoring system for ascites. Study We developed a decision-analytic model that examined 100 simulated patients over a 6-month horizon. We compared usual care to a new telemonitoring program, which we estimate costs $50,000/6 months. RESULTS: The cost of standard of care for 100 patients with cirrhotic ascites over a 6-month period is $167,500 more expensive than telemonitoring. By varying parameter probabilities by ± 10% and outcome costs by ± 20%, we found that standard of care remains more expensive than care with a telemonitoring intervention by $9400 to $340,200 per 6-month period. Standard of care leads to 9 more admissions (range 4 to 12) than a telemonitoring intervention, while telemonitoring leads to 9 more outpatient visits (range 6 to 9) and 28 additional outpatient large volume paracenteses (LVPs) (range 17 to 28). With more and less expensive telemonitoring interventions, standard of care remained more expensive. With 50% adherence to the intervention, standard of care was $89,848 more expensive. CONCLUSIONS: In almost all probability and cost scenarios, a telemonitoring intervention is cost-saving for the management of cirrhotic ascites. Using hospital admissions as a surrogate for quality of care, patient outcomes are improved primarily though more proactive medical intervention and more LVPs.

Patients' Risk Tolerance for Non-Dietary Therapies in Celiac Disease.

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder mediated by an immune response to dietary gluten that affects the small intestine and leads to inflammation, malabsorption, and systemic consequences.1 The only established therapy is strict adherence to a gluten-free diet.2,3 Recently there has been growth in the development of novel non-dietary therapies for patients with CD,4 which are driven by dissatisfaction with the burden of the gluten-free diet.5,6.