Modest decreases in NNRTI susceptibility do not influence virological outcome in patients receiving initial NNRTI-containing triple therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of modest (< 10-fold) decreases in baseline non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) susceptibility and their impact on virological response to NNRTI-containing triple therapy in drug-naive individuals. METHODS: Baseline HIV resistance phenotype, genotype and response to therapy were examined retrospectively for all antiretroviral-naive individuals initiating therapy with two nucleoside analogues and an NNRTI in British Columbia, Canada, between 05/1997 and 08/1999 (n = 279), followed until July 31 2001. Time to viral suppression (first of at least two consecutive plasma viral loads < 400 copies HIV RNA copies/ml) and viral rebound (to > or = 400 copies/ml after first pVL < 400 copies HIV RNA copies/ml), were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Nevirapine was the most commonly prescribed NNRTI (96%). Four- to 10-fold decreased susceptibility to NNRTIs was observed in > 30% of untreated individuals at baseline, an observation strongly driven by decreased susceptibility to delavirdine (22.4%). A > 10-fold decrease in susceptibility to any NNRTI was observed only rarely (< 2%). There was no association between four- and 10-fold decreased baseline susceptibility to NNRTIs and virological outcome (P > 0.05). In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictors of poor virological response to NNRTI-based therapy were baseline plasma viral load and the proportion of time on therapy in the first year of follow-up. There was no relationship between the presence of previously reported mutations associated with decreased NNRTI susceptibility (at codons 135 and 283 in HIV reverse transcriptase) and virological response. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the clinically significant level of resistance to NNRTIs, particularly nevirapine, in drug-naive individuals is likely greater than four- to 10-fold.

Both baseline HIV-1 drug resistance and antiretroviral drug levels are associated with short-term virologic responses to salvage therapy.

BACKGROUND: To determine the impact of HIV-1 drug resistance at baseline and antiretroviral drug levels (DL) during follow-up on virologic response to the next antiretroviral regimen. METHODS: Baseline genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility was obtained for plasma virus from patients failing a protease inhibitor-containing regimen. Untimed plasma antiretroviral DL were performed and the distribution of DL after 12 weeks of follow-up was classified as above (DLHigh) or below (DLLow) the median. Inhibitory quotients [IQ = (DL at week 12)/(fold change in IC50 to wild-type)] were determined for each drug in the regimen. Primary outcome was change in log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (DeltaVL) from baseline to 12 weeks. RESULTS: There were 137 patients who had baseline resistance data available for the antiretroviral drugs used in the salvage regimen, and DL at week 12. Each drug with DLHigh was associated with DeltaVL = -0.40 (P = 0.0002) while each drug with DLLow had DeltaVL = -0.16 (P = 0.11). In multivariate models DeltaVL associated with each active drug (defined by genotype) with DLHigh was -0.48 log10 (P < 0.0001), and with each active drug with DLLow was -0.22 (P = 0.03). The DeltaVL was -0.18 if no drugs in the regimen had an IQ > median, compared to -0.58 for one drug, -1.06 for two drugs, -0.86 for three drugs, and -1.44 for four or five drugs with IQ > median (P < 0.0001 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: In salvage therapy, both the number of active drugs and the DL for each drug in the new regimen determine the antiviral response.

A randomized trial assessing the impact of phenotypic resistance testing on antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of treatment decisions guided by phenotypic resistance testing (PRT) or standard of care (SOC) on short-term virological response. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in 25 university and private practice centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 272 subjects who failed to achieve or maintain virological suppression (HIV-1-RNA plasma level > 2000 copies/ml) with previous exposure to two or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one protease inhibitor. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization was to antiretroviral therapy guided by PRT or SOC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of subjects with HIV-1-RNA plasma levels less than 400 copies/ml at week 16 (primary); change from baseline in HIV-1-RNA plasma levels and number of "active" (less than fourfold resistance) antiretroviral agents used (secondary). RESULTS: At week 16, using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a greater proportion of subjects had HIV-1-RNA levels less than 400 copies/ml in the PRT than in the SOC arm (P = 0.036, ITT observed; P = 0.079, ITT missing equals failure). An ITT observed analysis showed that subjects in the PRT arm had a significantly greater median reduction in HIV-1-RNA levels from baseline than the SOC arm (P = 0.005 for 400 copies/ml; P = 0.049 for 50 copies/ml assay detection limit). Significantly more subjects in the PRT arm were treated with two or more "active" antiretroviral agents than in the SOC arm (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Antiretroviral treatment guided prospectively by PRT led to the increased use of "active" antiretroviral agents and was associated with a significantly better virological response.