RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes of reconstruction of the aortomitral continuity (AMC) during concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacement (ie, the "Commando" procedure). DESIGN: A retrospective study of consecutive cardiac surgeries from 2010 to 2022. SETTING: At a single institution. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing double aortic and mitral valve replacement. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were dichotomized by the performance (or not) of AMC reconstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 331 patients underwent double-valve replacement, of whom 21 patients (6.3%) had a Commando procedure. The Commando group was more likely to have had a previous aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) (66.7% v 27.4%, p < 0.001), redo cardiac surgery (71.4% v 31.3%, p < 0.001), and emergent/salvage surgery (14.3% v 1.61%, p = 0.001), whereas surgery was more often performed for endocarditis in the Commando group (52.4% v 22.9%, p = 0.003). The Commando group had higher operative mortality (28.6% v 10.7%, p = 0.014), more prolonged ventilation (61.9% v 31.9%, p = 0.005), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (312 ± 118 v 218 ± 85 minutes, p < 0.001), and longer ischemic time (252 ± 90 v 176 ± 66 minutes, p < 0.001). Despite increased short-term morbidity in the Commando group, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation showed no difference in long-term survival between each group (p = 0.386, log-rank). On multivariate Cox analysis, the Commando procedure was not associated with an increased hazard of death, compared to MVR + AVR (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% CI: 0.65-2.59, p = 0.496). CONCLUSIONS: Although short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality were found to be higher for patients undergoing the Commando procedure, AMC reconstruction may be equally durable in the long term.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Valva Mitral , Humanos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Valva Aórtica/cirurgiaRESUMO
Chemodectomas are tumors derived from parasympathetic nonchromaffin cells and are often found in the aortic and carotid bodies. They are generally benign but can cause mass-effect symptoms and have local or distant spread. Surgical excision has been the main curative treatment strategy. The National Cancer Database was reviewed to study all patients with carotid or aortic body tumors from 2004 to 2015. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes were examined, split by tumor location. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated for both locations. In total, 248 patients were examined, with 151 having a tumor in the carotid body and 97 having a tumor in the aortic body. Many variables were similar between both tumor locations. However, aortic body tumors were larger than those in the carotid body (477.80 ± 477.58 mm vs 320.64 ± 436.53 mm, p = 0.008). More regional lymph nodes were positive in aortic body tumors (65.52 ± 45.73 vs 35.46 ± 46.44, p <0.001). There were more distant metastases at the time of diagnosis in carotid body tumors (p = 0.003). Chemotherapy was used more for aortic body tumors (p = 0.001); surgery was used more for carotid body tumors (p <0.001). There are slight differences in tumor characteristics and response to treatment. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of management, and radiation can often be considered. In conclusion, chemodectomas are generally benign but can present with metastasis and compressive symptoms that make understanding their physiology and treatment important.