Nonclinical Development of ENV905 (Difluprednate) Ophthalmic Implant for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated with Ocular Surgery.

PURPOSE: Topical corticosteroids are widely used in the treatment of inflammation and pain after ocular surgery, but they possess several shortcomings, including frequent dosing and low patient adherence. We evaluated the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ENV905 (difluprednate or DFBA) Ophthalmic Implant, a single-dose drug delivery system, compared with 0.05% Durezol. METHODS: PRINT® technology was used to fabricate ENV905 implants for either intracameral (IC) or subconjunctival (SCJ) delivery of extended-release DFBA. A postoperative inflammation model and ocular pharmacokinetics studies of ENV905 or Durezol were conducted in albino rabbits for a maximum of 12 weeks. RESULTS: Suppression of ocular inflammation was marked for both IC and SJC ENV905 compared with placebo, and it was superior or equivalent to that observed with QID Durezol. Concentrations of desacetyl difluprednate (DFB, active metabolite) peaked on day 1 and tapered over time for ENV905, with IC ENV905 delivering DFB to the target tissue at the time of greatest inflammation, whereas SJC produced a longer duration of exposure. Durezol eyes demonstrated consistent exposure over time with maximal exposure in the cornea. Although the pharmacokinetic profile differed for the two routes, efficacy was similar. CONCLUSION: ENV905 was well tolerated and demonstrated a robust reduction in ocular inflammation with targeted drug delivery. The results from these studies show that ENV905 provides a sustained therapeutic effect after a single dose. By resolving low patient compliance and eliminating the peaks and troughs in drug concentration, sustained drug delivery via ENV905 may further improve the overall control of postoperative inflammation and pain.

Ocular surface distribution and pharmacokinetics of a novel ophthalmic 1% azithromycin formulation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the ocular distribution of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution and the effect of polycarbophil-based mucoadhesive formulation on ocular tissue levels of azithromycin after single and multiple topical administrations in the rabbit eye. METHODS: Rabbits were treated with either a single administration of 1% azithromycin solution with or without polycarbophil, or with multiple administrations of 1% azithromycin solution in polycarbophil. Drug concentrations were measured using LC/MS/MS. Conjunctiva, cornea, aqueous humor, and tear samples were analyzed over a period of 144 h after a single administration of azithromycin with or without polycarbophil. Eyelid, conjunctiva, cornea, aqueous humor, and tear samples were collected over a period of 288 h during and after multiple administrations of azithromycin. RESULTS: Azithromycin was rapidly absorbed and distributed in the ocular tissues, reaching within 5 min, concentrations of 10,539 microg/mL in tear film, 108 microg/g in conjunctiva, and 40 microg/g in the cornea. The drug demonstrated tissue-specific half-lives of 15, 63, and 67 h, respectively. Following multiple administrations, the drug gradually accumulated. The polycarbophil formulation increased the bioavailability of the drug, producing peak concentrations that were between 5- and 12-fold higher than those without polycarbophil. Azithromycin also distributed rapidly in the eyelids, reaching peak concentrations of 180 mug/g at the end of the 7-day treatment, and was eliminated with a half-life of 125 h. Six days after treatment was discontinued, eyelid levels of azithromycin were above 40 microg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained and high concentrations were encountered with 7-day approved administration of 1% azithromycin formulation (AzaSite, Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Durham, NC) within all ocular surface tissues, particularly the lids. Many ocular surface disorders involving the tear film, eyelids, and adnexal structures are associated with chronic, low-grade bacterial infection and may potentially lead to decreased vision secondary to corneal scarring. Various topical antibiotic and steroid combinations with or without oral tetracyclines are commonly used with variable clinical response and known potential side effects. The clinical relevance of this study is unknown; however, the long-lasting antibacterial and additional anti-inflammatory properties of topical azithromycin might offer an effective alternative treatment option and should be explored further in clinical studies.