Incidence of venous thromboembolic events not related to vascular catheters in a prospective cohort of critically ill children.

The risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered to be low in the general paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) population, and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not routinely used. PICU patients considered at high-risk of VTE could possibly benefit from pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, but the incidence of VTE in this group of patients is unclear. This was an observational, prospective study at a tertiary multi-disciplinary paediatric hospital. We used comprehensive ultrasonography screening for VTE in critically ill children with multiple risk factors for VTE. Patients admitted to PICU ≥ 72 h and with ≥ two risk factors for VTE were included. Patients receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during their entire PICU stay were excluded. The primary outcome of the study was VTEs not related to the use of a CVC. Ultrasonography screening of the great veins was performed at PICU discharge. Seventy patients with median (interquartile range) 3 (2-4) risk factors for VTE were evaluated. Median age was 0.3 years (0.03-4.3) and median PICU length of stay 9 days (5-17). Regarding the primary outcome, no symptomatic VTEs occurred and no asymptomatic VTEs were found on ultrasonography screening, resulting in an incidence of VTEs not related to a vascular catheter of 0% (95% CI: 0-5.1%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that VTEs not related to a vascular catheter are a rare event even in a selected group of severely ill small children considered to be at high risk of VTE. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children in the PICU often have several risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). • The incidence of VTE in PICU patients is highly uncertain, and there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding VTE prophylaxis. WHAT IS NEW: • This study found an incidence of VTEs not related to a vascular catheter of 0% (95% CI: 0-5.1%). • This indicates that such VTE events are rare even in PICU patients with multiple risk factors for VTE.

Incidence of and risk factors for venous thrombosis in children with percutaneous non-tunnelled central venous catheters.

BACKGROUND: Venous thrombosis (VT) in children is often associated with a central venous catheter (CVC). We aimed to determine the incidence of VT associated with percutaneous non-tunnelled CVCs in a general paediatric population, and to identify risk factors for VT in this cohort. METHODS: Observational, prospective study enrolling consecutive patients at a tertiary multi-disciplinary paediatric hospital. A total of 211 percutaneous, non-tunnelled CVCs were analysed. Data regarding potential risk factors for CVC-related VT were collected. Compression ultrasonography with colour Doppler was used to diagnose VT. RESULTS: Overall, 30.3% of children developed CVC-related VT, with an incidence rate of 29.6 (confidence interval, 22.5-36.9) cases/1000 CVC days. Upper body CVC location, multiple lumen CVCs, and male gender were independent risk factors for VT in multivariate analysis. All upper body VTs were in the internal jugular vein (IJV). The occurrence of CVC-related VT did not affect length of paediatric ICU or hospital stay. In patients with VT, femoral CVCs, young age, paediatric ICU admission, and a ratio of CVC/vein diameter >0.33 were associated with VT being symptomatic, occlusive, or both. IJV VT was often asymptomatic and non-occlusive. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric non-tunnelled CVCs are frequently complicated by VT. Avoiding IJV CVCs and multiple lumen catheters could potentially reduce the overall risk of VT. However, IJV VT was more likely to be smaller and asymptomatic compared with femoral vein VT. More data are needed on the risk of complications from smaller, asymptomatic VT compared with the group of VT with symptoms or vein occlusion. Femoral vein CVCs and CVC/vein diameter >0.33 could be modifiable risk factors for VT with larger thrombotic mass. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000442505.