The state of neurosurgical training and education in East Asia: analysis and strategy development for this frontier of the world.

OBJECTIVE: The authors, who are from Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Taiwan, sought to illustrate the processes of training neurosurgeons in their respective settings by presenting data and analyses of the current state of neurosurgical education across the East Asian region. METHODS: The authors obtained quantitative data as key indicators of the neurosurgical workforce from each country. Qualitative data analysis was also done to provide a description of the current state of neurosurgical training and education in the region. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis was also done to identify strategies for improvement. RESULTS: The number of neurosurgeons in each country is as follows: 370 in Indonesia, 10,014 in Japan, 152 in Malaysia, 134 in the Philippines, and 639 in Taiwan. With a large neurosurgical workforce, the high-income countries Japan and Taiwan have relatively high neurosurgeon to population ratios of 1 per 13,000 and 1 per 37,000, respectively. In contrast, the low- to middle-income countries Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines have low neurosurgeon to population ratios of 1 per 731,000, 1 per 210,000, and 1 per 807,000, respectively. In terms of the number of training centers, Japan has 857, Taiwan 30, Indonesia 7, Malaysia 5, and the Philippines 10. In terms of the number of neurosurgical residents, Japan has 1000, Taiwan 170, Indonesia 199, Malaysia 53, and the Philippines 51. The average number of yearly additions to the neurosurgical workforce is as follows: Japan 180, Taiwan 27, Indonesia 10, Malaysia 4, and the Philippines 3. The different countries included in this report have many similarities and differences in their models and systems of neurosurgical education. Certain important strategies have been formulated in order for the system to be responsive to the needs of the catchment population: 1) establishment of a robust network of international collaboration for reciprocal certification, skills sharing, and subspecialty training; 2) incorporation of in-service residency and fellowship training within the framework of improving access to neurosurgical care; and 3) strengthening health systems, increasing funding, and developing related policies for infrastructure development. CONCLUSIONS: The varied situations of neurosurgical education in the East Asian region require strategies that take into account the different contexts in which programs are structured. Improving the education of current and future neurosurgeons becomes an important consideration in addressing the health inequalities in terms of access and quality of care afflicting the growing population in this region of the world.

Long-term outcomes of pallidal deep brain stimulation in X-linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP): Up to 84 months follow-up and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP/DYT3/Lubag) patients had improved dystonia and parkinsonism with bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the literature. METHOD: We reviewed eleven XDP patients who underwent bilateral pallidal DBS from October 2009 to September 2018. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III scores were reviewed from baseline up to the longest follow-up together with the demographic and clinical data. The published case reports on DBS in XDP were also reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age was 39 ±â€¯9.2 years with a mean disease duration of 3 years (range 1-9 years). An immediate response for dystonia post-DBS (1 month) was seen in all cases, with a mean BFMDRS score of 23.3 ±â€¯12.12 [from a mean baseline of 36.3 ±â€¯12.1] and a small change in the mean UPDRS-III score of 20 ±â€¯10.39 [from a mean baseline of 24.04 ±â€¯8.74]. At 12 months (n = 10), the mean BFMDRS score was 13.7 ±â€¯10.63 and the mean UPDRS-III score was 19 ±â€¯13.19. There was improvement in the clinical and functional stage of the patients, with majority in Stage 1 (n = 3) and Stage 2 (n = 5) at their last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bilateral pallidal DBS should be considered as a treatment option for XDP. It is effective in the first 12 months in controlling dystonia with variable response in controlling parkinsonism. It may be effective in up to 72-84 months, as seen in three patients.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease in the Philippines: Outcomes of the Philippine Movement Disorder Surgery Center.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment modality for Parkinson disease (PD). The first DBS for PD in the Philippines was performed at the Philippine Movement Disorder Surgery Center in 2006. There are no Philippine data on DBS for PD. We aim to determine the motor improvement and reduction in medication dosage of all patients with PD who underwent DBS at the Philippine Movement Disorder Surgery Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients with PD (n = 17) who underwent DBS from 2006 to 2016. The change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor and levodopa equivalent dose were determined. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in the UPDRS motor in all patients off medication at 3 months (48.2%; P = 0.004), 1 year (47.3%; P = 0.026), 2 years (48.4%; P = 0.021), and 3 years (66.0%; P = 0.032) after DBS and on medication at 3 months (43.3%; P = 0.023), 6 months (24.7%; P = 0.053), and 1 year (38.1%; P = 0.033). A significant reduction in the dosage of PD medications was also seen until the second year of follow-up (52.3%; P < 0.001). Adverse events included an attempted suicide and a device-related infection. CONCLUSIONS: DBS for PD improves the UPDRS motor score in the off-medication and on-medication state, with the maximal benefit seen at 3 years after surgery and reduces PD medication dosage by half. Although the benefit from DBS is undeniable, the high cost of the procedure precludes more patients from benefitting from it. There is a need for government support to expand access to DBS.

The promise of deep brain stimulation in X-linked dystonia parkinsonism.

X-Linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP) is a rapidly progressive and disabling neurodegenerative disease affecting mainly male Filipinos with origins from Panay Island. We reviewed all the past neurosurgical ablative procedures done for XDP patients listed in the Philippine XDP registry. From 1960 to 1982, six patients had undergone bilateral chemopallidotomies or bilateral thalomotomies staged over time. Half of these patients had significant improvement in their symptoms but five of the six patients (83%) developed postoperative morbidities, mainly speech impairment or hemiparesis. All the five reported GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) cases for XDP were also reviewed, showing consistently immediate improvement of symptoms (61.5%-88.3% decrease in the Burke-Marsden-Fahn Dystonia Rating Scale) lasting up to a year with no adverse effects noted. We also present the first Philippine case of GPi DBS done in the youngest XDP patient to date. This present case showed dramatic improvement (88.3% decrease of the Burke-Marsden-Fahn Dystonia Rating Scale) of his dystonic symptoms, without incurring any persistent adverse effects. The results of these early cases of pallidal DBS for XDP show that DBS is generally a safe and effective procedure for alleviating the disabling symptoms of XDP in contrast to previous ablative surgeries performed on these patients.

Gamma knife radiosurgery and brain metastases: local control, survival, and quality of life.

OBJECT: The purpose of this paper was to describe the clinical outcome in patients with brain metastases who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS). METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of 54 patients with brain metastases who underwent 62 GKS procedures. This series covered a 43-month period. A total of 174 lesions were treated: 38 patients harbored solitary whereas 24 patients harbored multiple metastases. The authors assessed outcome by examining local disease control, survival, and quality of life. The overall local control rate was 85%; the mean time to failure of local control was 10.5 months; and median survival was 8.4 months. Median survival, evaluated by the log-rank test, was greater among patients with a single metastasis (p = 0.043), breast cancer (p = 0.021), and those who had undergone multiple GKS procedures for local failure (p = 0.009). The initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score and whole-brain radiotherapy were not significantly related to median survival. The KPS scores tended to remain stable through the follow-up period. There were no morbidities or deaths attributable to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Results in this series suggest that GKS can be an effective tool for the control of brain metastases. A prospective investigation should be performed to validate trends seen in this retrospective study.