Breast Cancer Patient's Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery at 5 and 10 Years for Stage II-III Disease.

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer offers the possibility to facilitate breast and axillary surgery; it is a test of chemosensibility in vivo with significant prognostic value and may be used to tailor adjuvant treatment according to the response. Material and Methods: A retrospective single-institution cohort of 482 stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracycline and taxans, plus antiHEr2 in Her2-positive cases, was studied. Survival was calculated at 5 and 10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test were calculated for differences according to age, BRCA status, menopausal status, TNM, pathological and molecular surrogate subtype, 20% TIL cut-off, surgical procedure, response to chemotherapy and the presence of vascular invasion. Results: The pCR rate was 25.3% and was greater in HER2 (51.3%) and TNBC (31.7%) and in BRCA carriers (41.9%). The factors independently related to patient survival were pathology and molecular surrogate subtype, type of surgery, response to NACT and vascular invasion. BRCA status was a protective prognostic factor without reaching statistical significance, with an HR 0.5 (95%CI 0.1-1.4). Mastectomy presented a double risk of distant recurrence compared to breast-conservative surgery (BCS), supporting BCS as a safe option after NACT. After a mean follow-up of 126 (SD 43) months, luminal tumors presented a substantial difference in survival rates calculated at 5 or 10 years (81.2% compared to 74.7%), whereas that for TNBC was 75.3 and 73.5, respectively. The greatest difference was seen according to the response in patients with pCR, who exhibited a 10 years DDFS of 95.5% vs. 72.4% for those patients without pCR, p < 0001. This difference was especially meaningful in TNBC: the 10 years DDFS according to an RCB of 0 to 3 was 100%, 80.6%, 69% and 49.2%, respectively, p < 0001. Patients with a particularly poor prognosis were those with lobular carcinomas, with a 10 years DDFS of 42.9% vs. 79.7% for ductal carcinomas, p = 0.001, and patients with vascular invasion at the surgical specimen, with a 10 years DDFS of 59.2% vs. 83.6% for those patients without vascular invasion, p < 0.001. Remarkably, BRCA carriers presented a longer survival, with an estimated 10 years DDFS of 89.6% vs. 77.2% for non-carriers, p = 0.054. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help patients and clinicians make well-informed decisions.

Embolismo por polimetil-metacrilato posterior a inyección subcutánea en región glútea: a propósito de un caso / Polymethyl-methacrylate embolism after subcutaneous injection in gluteal region: report of a case

El polimetil-metacrilato es un polímero de alta resistencia al impacto, ampliamente utilizado en diferentes campos de la medicina, sin embargo, aún no está clara su indicación como relleno glúteo. A pesar de su aparente inocuidad, se han presentado complicaciones durante su uso como granulomas y nódulos palpables. Se han reportado casos de embolismo pulmonar por polimetil-metacrilato posterior a vertebroplastias. Sin embargo, no se encontró reporte bibliográfico de casos de embolismo pulmonar con su uso en procedimientos estéticos. Presentamos caso de paciente femenino de 31 años de edad, quien 4 horas luego de la inyección de 500 cm3 de polimetil-metacrilato en cada región glútea, presenta disnea en reposo de aparición súbita con tos seca y palpitaciones, disminución de agudeza visual y petequias generalizadas. Se diagnostica probable embolismo pulmonar por polimetil-metacrilato y retinopatía de Purtscher. Existe similitud clínica e imaginología del caso en estudio con embolismo por silicone, y las imágenes del fondo de ojo semejan la obstrucción de pequeñas arteriolas retinianas compatibles con este diagnóstico. Se sugieren nuevas investigaciones en el uso de polimetil-metacrilato como procedimiento estético en pro de la seguridad y en beneficio de los pacientes

Polymethyl-methacrylate is a high impact resistant polymer, widely used in different medicine fields, however its indication in buttock implants is still not clear. Even though its apparent innocuity, it has presented complications like granulomas and palpable nodules. There have been reported cases of pulmonary embolism caused by polimetil-metacrilato secondary to vertebroplasties. However, there have been no bibliographic cases of pulmonary embolism due to its use in aesthetic procedures. We present a case of a woman patient of 31 years old, who 4 hours after 500 cc injection of polymethyl- Methacrylate in each buttock, presents rest dyspnea with abrupt dry cough and palpitations, reduction in visual acuity and generalized petechiae. It is diagnosed probable pulmonary embolism by polimetil-metacrilato and Purtscher retinopathy. There is a clinical and imaginological similitude between this case and silicone embolism and the images of fondoscopy are similar to those of small retinian arteriole obstruction compatible with the diagnosis. Thereby, it is suggested new investigations in the use of polymethyl-methacrylate as esthetic procedure in favor of the patient’s security and benefit