Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Biliary complications are a major drawback of liver transplantation. AIM: To analyse, in a single centre, experience in endoscopic diagnosis and management of biliary complications after liver transplantation. PATIENTS: A total of 147 consecutive liver transplantations performed on 132 patients over a 5-year period. METHODS: Evaluation of the incidence and type of biliary-related complications and analysis of their diagnosis and endoscopic treatment by cholangiopancreatography in terms of success of the endoscopic approach, conversion to surgery and long-term patient and graft survival. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed on 30 patients (23%). Overall incidence of biliary complications as confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was 17% (25 cases). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was negative in 5 cases (16%). Biliary complications were successfully treated by endoscopy in 84% of cases (21 out of 25 patients); 4 cases (16%) required a surgical approach (2 choledochojejunostomy, 2 retransplantation) due to failure to correct the problem endoscopically. Stenoses and biliary sludge associated with retained internal stent were almost always successfully managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, while anastomotic leakage more frequently required a surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a safe and effective approach for diagnosis and treatment of biliary-related complications after liver transplantation thereby reducing morbidity and mortality related to re-operation which is, however, required in selected cases.

Percutaneous mechanical fragmentation and stent placement for the treatment of early posttransplantation portal vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Early portal vein thrombosis is a rare but severe complication of liver transplantation requiring retransplantation or at least surgical thrombectomy, both hampered by high morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We describe of a case of successful long-term recanalization of early posttransplantation portal vein thrombosis by a minimally invasive percutaneous transhepatic angiographic approach using both mechanical fragmentation and pharmacological lysis of the thrombus followed by stent placement. RESULTS: Mechanical fragmentation and contemporaneous local urokinase administration resulted in complete removal of the clot; the use of a vascular stent after balloon dilatation allowed restoration of normal blood flow to the liver after 9 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This case report confirms the possibility of successful recanalization of the portal vein after early posttransplantation thrombosis by a minimally invasive angiographic approach. Balloon dilatation and placement of a vascular stent could help to decrease the risk of recurrent thrombosis.

[Sliding hiatal hernia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux: physiopathology and surgical treatment]. / Ernia iatale da scivolamento nel paziente con malattia da reflusso gastroesofageo. Fisiopatologia e terapia chirurgica.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to evaluate how the sliding hiatal hernia, in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), acts on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal clearance, and how surgical therapy corrects the physiopathological parameters. METHODS: Records of 25 patients with only GERD and of 15 with GERD associated to hiatal hernia (> 3.5 cm) were reviewed. Ten subjects without symptoms and/or endoscopic and functional signs of GERD were considered as control group. The selection of the patients was done by reviewing radiographic examination, endoscopy and functional tests (esophageal manometry, pH-monitoring). RESULTS: Manometry showed a greater LES incompetence (pressure and length) and a worse peristalsis (distal amplitude) in the group with reflux and hiatal hernia against patients with reflux only. Also, patients with hiatal hernia had more acid exposure (total time pH < 4 in the distal esophagus) and a longer time of esophageal clearance, at pH-monitoring. The functional tests in 8 patients, before and after laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication with posterior closing of the crura, showed a normalised LES, esophageal clearance and acid exposure. Esophageal peristalsis did not show any statistically significance. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of hiatal hernia, in patients with GERD, causes worse LES, peristalsis and clearance with a greater acid exposure of the esophagus. Fundoplication, by reconstructing the sphincter-diaphragm unit, normalises the preoperative physiopathology situation but without an effective peristalsis improvement.

[Echolaparoscopy in the staging of abdominal neoplasms. Prospective study]. / L'ecolaparoscopia nella stadiazione delle neoplasie addominali. Studio prospettico.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and influence on surgical strategy of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound on staging of abdominal malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic ultrasound staging, according to the TNM classification, of 80 consecutive cases of abdominal malignancies in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and influence on surgical strategy. Pathologic examination of final surgical specimens or laparoscopic biopsies was used as control. RESULTS: Laparoscopic ultrasound evaluation was carried out successfully in 95% of cases with no mortality and morbidity. Twenty one out of 76 patients (28%) had their stage changed based on laparoscopic ultrasound findings. Unnecessary laparotomy was avoided in 11 cases (14%) due to evidence of advanced disease at laparoscopic ultrasound. For pancreatic cancer laparoscopic ultrasound was more sensitive for TNM, specificity was higher just for nodal evaluation. For liver tumor laparoscopic staging revealed more sensitive for N and M evaluation. Laparoscopic ultrasound staging had low specificity and sensitivity for T evaluation, while it was more sensitive and specific than clinical staging for nodal and distant metastasis assessment respectively for gastric and colon cancer. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ultrasound staging is a safe, feasible and effective staging tool for several abdominal malignancies. The introduction of laparoscopic ultrasound probes overcomes the lack of tactile sensation proper of laparoscopy, allowing precise evaluation of both solid and deeply located abdominal structures. The use of laparoscopic ultrasound staging may help to reduce the number of unnecessary laparotomies.

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the management of splenomegaly: our preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic splenectomy for normal-sized spleens has several advantages compared with laparotomy. Only a few cases of splenomegaly done by laparoscopy are reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to show that laparoscopy for splenomegaly is feasible and has several advantages over the open operation. METHODS: We performed retrospective chart review of 8 cases of splenomegaly managed by laparoscopy (group 1), 15 cases of open splenomegaly (group 2), and 27 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy for normal-sized spleens (group 3). Comparison has been done between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3 in terms of operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusion, postoperative ileus, postoperative stay, and mortality and morbidity rates. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 required longer operative time and significantly less intraoperative blood transfusion compared with group 2. The postoperative course was less complicated and shorter in group 1 than in group 2. Operative time was longer in group 1 compared with group 3. No significant differences in terms of postoperative course have been found between groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy for splenomegaly is a feasible, effective, and safe technique for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. This approach seems to have several advantages over the open operation. Prospective, randomized trials would be required for a proper quantitative evaluation.