Free Fibula Flap in Traumatic Femoral Bone Reconstruction: A 10-year Review.

Introduction: The loss of femoral bone substance represents a major therapeutic issue. When the loss of bone substance is extensive, or the local condition is unfavourable, there are few satisfactory solutions. In this study, we share our experience of large femoral bone reconstruction by free fibula flap. Materials and methods: A retrospective monocentric chart review (2007-2017) was performed for 26 patients after receiving a pure bone-free fibula flap operation. The times of consolidation and hypertrophy of the graft were analysed according to the fixation with a 2-year follow-up. Results: The time to consolidation was 8.7 months (range, 6-15) for double plates, 7.2 months (range, 5-11) for locked plates, 6 months (range, 5-7) for external fixators and plate blades and 8 months (range, 7-9) for intramedullary nails.Full weight-bearing was resumed at an average of 6.5 months (range, 5-10) postoperatively. It was authorised at 7 months (range, 5-10) for patients fixed by double plate, at 6.3 months (range, 5-9) for those fixed by a locked plate, at 5.5 months (range, 5-6) for those fixed by an external fixator or plate blade and at 7 months for those fixed by an intramedullary nail. Conclusion: Free fibula flap remains reliable in the face of a great loss of bone material after trauma, with high consolidation rates. The choice of fixation must be reasoned and should offer a compromise between stability, allowing consolidation and hypertrophy of the graft, and rigidity, exposing the risk of massive osteosynthesis dismantling. Other multicentric studies, including more patients, should be carried out to compare the techniques of fixation. How to cite this article: Viaud-Ambrosino S, Bargemon JBV, Kachouh N, et al. Free Fibula Flap in Traumatic Femoral Bone Reconstruction: A 10-year Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):44-50.

Radiocarpal fracture-dislocation: Review of the literature, new classification and decision algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Radiocarpal fractures and dislocations are rarely described in the literature. However, the consequences at the functional level are severe, with the loss of almost half of the articular amplitude. The most widespread classification is that of Dumontier, which divides the injury into two categories according to the presence or absence of a fracture. Currently, no classification considers fracture-dislocations in a global and multi-tissue manner; therefore, no therapeutic strategy has been reported. METHODS: We conducted an exhaustive bibliographic search for cohort or case report articles concerning radiocarpal fracture-dislocations published between 1990 and the present. Only descriptions of the injury were identified (noting the type of fracture, direction of displacement and carpal injuries). RESULTS: In all, data were collected from 14 retrospective series and 16 case reports involving 218 patients. Thirty-five and 183 cases involved anterior and posterior displacement, respectively. A fracture of the distal radius was found in 183 cases and 35 cases had a dislocation only, with no significant fracture. Among the posterior displacements, 44 isolated styloid fractures, 62 styloid and posterior marginal fractures, 29 bimarginal fractures (large anterior fragment and small posterior fragment) and 31 fractures of all the fragments described by Medoff with impaction of the central pavement were found. Anterior displacement fractures were found in 17 cases (styloid and/or anterior marginal fracture). We were able to group the different traumatic clinical forms according to a six-category classification. DISCUSSION: A review of the literature highlighted three major components in the management of radiocarpal fracture-dislocations: the bone component, the ligament component and the associated intracarpal lesions. These three components were included in our classification and allowed us to accurately describe all types of radiocarpal fracture-dislocations published in the literature. Authors currently agree on management of the bone component but disagree on that of the ligament component. Particular attention should be paid to intracarpal lesions, which lead to poor outcomes if ignored. Based on our biographical research, we propose a management plan for these complex injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VI.

What is the place of wrist arthroscopy in surgical residents' training? Wrist Arthroscopy in Residents Survey (WARS).

INTRODUCTION: Wrist arthroscopy has become an essential method in the management of patients suffering from wrist pathologies. This technique must be mastered by residents wishing to specialize in upper limb surgery. However, no study has evaluated residents' access to wrist arthroscopy. HYPOTHESIS: Residents have difficulty accessing wrist arthroscopy surgery during their training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We sent out an online questionnaire to all orthopedic and plastic surgery referents in France. Data were collected over a 6-month period from December 2020 to May 2021. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Regarding the 98 responses obtained, we observed that 77.54% of residents have seen between 0 and 10 wrist arthroscopies and 35.71% have never seen a wrist arthroscopy. In addition, only 23.80% of residents have had access to training on cadavers, and 57.14% of residents were trained in private facilities. DISCUSSION: Access to the operating room remains difficult for residents in upper limb surgery. Our results suggest that wrist arthroscopy training could be improved. New training methods could be adapted for wrist arthroscopy and to overcome the lack of access to wrist arthroscopy for residents. LEVEL OF INCIDENCE: IV.

A jersey finger diagnostic trap: Rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon.

Management of a 30-year-old man with a rarely described form of jersey finger: simultaneous rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis on the middle finger. Excision of the superficial tendon and anchoring of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon was performed. After 6 months of follow-up, the patient did not present any complaint and reported a complete return to his daily activities. Although very rare, these lesions could be easily detected upstream by ultrasound to avoid 'surprise' during surgical exploration and allow better operative planning.