OFF-times before, during, and after nighttime sleep periods in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations and the effects of opicapone: A post hoc analysis of diary data from BIPARK-1 and -2.

INTRODUCTION: In BIPARK-1 and BIPARK-2, addition of once-daily opicapone to levodopa/carbidopa significantly reduced daily "OFF"-time relative to placebo in adults with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. Diary data from these studies were pooled and analyzed post hoc to characterize "OFF"-times around nighttime sleep and to explore the effects of opicapone 50 mg. METHODS: "OFF" before sleep (OBS), "OFF during the nighttime sleep period" (ODNSP), early morning "OFF" (EMO), and duration of nighttime sleep and awake periods were analyzed descriptively at baseline. Mean changes from baseline to Week 14/15 (end of double-blind treatment) were analyzed using two-sided t-tests in participants with data for both visits. RESULTS: At baseline, 88.3 % (454/514) of participants reported having OBS (34.0 %), ODNSP (17.1 %), or EMO (79.6 %). Those with ODNSP had substantially shorter mean duration of uninterrupted sleep (4.4 h) than the overall pooled population (7.1 h). At Week 14/15, mean decrease from baseline in ODNSP duration was significantly greater with opicapone than with placebo (-0.9 vs. -0.4 h, P < 0.05). In participants with ODNSP at baseline, the decrease in total time spent awake during the night-time sleep period was significantly greater with opicapone than with placebo (-1.0 vs. -0.4 h, P < 0.05), as was the reduction in percent time spent awake during the night-time sleep period (-12.8 % vs. -4.5 %, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: "OFF"-times around nighttime sleep were common in BIPARK-1 and BIPARK-2. Opicapone may improve sleep by decreasing the amount of time spent awake during the night in patients with PD who have night-time sleep period "OFF" episodes.

Validation of the RBD Symptom Severity Scale in the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy Consortium.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterized by dream enactment. The International RBD Study Group developed the RBD Symptom Severity Scale (RBDSSS) to assess symptom severity for clinical or research use. We assessed the psychometric and clinimetric properties of the RBDSSS in participants enrolled in the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium for RBD. METHODS: NAPS participants, who have polysomnogram-confirmed RBD, and their bedpartners completed the RBDSSS (participant and bedpartner versions). The RBDSSS contains 8 questions to assess the frequency and severity/impact of (1) dream content, (2) vocalizations, (3) movements, and (4) injuries associated with RBD. Total scores for participant (maximum score = 54) and bedpartner (maximum score = 38) questionnaires were derived by multiplying frequency and severity scores for each question. The Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) and RBD symptom frequency were assessed by a physician during a semistructured clinical interview with participants and, if available, bedpartners. Descriptive analyses, correlations between overall scores, and subitems were assessed, and item response analysis was performed to determine the scale's validity. RESULTS: Among 261 study participants, the median (interquartile range) score for the RBDSSS-PT (participant) was 10 (4-18) and that for the RBDSSS-BP (bedpartner) was 8 (4-15). The median CGI-S was 3 (3-4), indicating moderate severity. RBDSSS-BP scores were significantly lower in women with RBD (6 vs 9, p = 0.02), while there were no sex differences in RBDSSS-PT scores (8 vs 10.5, p = 0.615). Positive correlations were found between RBDSSS-PT vs RBDSSS-BP (Spearman rs = 0.561), RBDSSS-PT vs CGI-S (rs = 0.556), and RBDSSS-BP vs CGI-S (rs = 0.491, all p < 0.0001). Item response analysis showed a high discriminatory value (range 1.40-2.12) for the RBDSSS-PT and RBDSSS-BP (1.29-3.47). DISCUSSION: We describe the RBDSSS with adequate psychometric and clinimetric properties to quantify RBD symptom severity and good concordance between participant and bedpartner questionnaires and between RBDSSS scores and clinician-assessed global severity.

Comorbid neurotrauma increases neurodegenerative-relevant cognitive, motor, and autonomic dysfunction in patients with REM sleep behavior disorder: A substudy of the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy Consortium.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is strongly associated with phenoconversion to an overt synucleinopathy, e.g., Parkinson's disease (PD), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), and related disorders. Comorbid traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - henceforth "neurotrauma" (NT) - increase the odds of RBD by ~2.5-fold and is associated with an increased rate of service-connected PD in Veterans. Thus, RBD and NT are both independently associated with PD; however, it is unclear how NT influences neurological function in patients with RBD. METHODS: Participants ≥18 years with overnight-polysomnogram-confirmed RBD were enrolled between 8/2018 to 4/2021 through the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium. Standardized assessments for RBD, TBI, and PTSD history, as well as cognitive, motor, sensory and autonomic function were completed. This cross-sectional analysis compared cases (n=24; RBD+NT) to controls (n=96; RBD), matched for age (~60 years), sex (15% female), and years of education (~15 years). RESULTS: RBD+NT reported earlier RBD symptom onset (37.5±11.9 vs. 52.2±15.1 years of age) and a more severe RBD phenotype. Similarly, RBD+NT reported more severe anxiety and depression, greater frequency of hypertension, and significantly worse cognitive, motor, and autonomic function compared to RBD. No differences in olfaction or color vision were observed. CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional, matched case:control study shows individuals with RBD+NT have significantly worse neurological measures related to common features of an overt synucleinopathy. Confirmatory longitudinal studies are ongoing; however, these results suggest RBD+NT may be associated with more advanced neurological symptoms related to an evolving neurodegenerative process.

Role of sleep in neurodegeneration: the consensus report of the 5th Think Tank World Sleep Forum.

Sleep abnormalities may represent an independent risk factor for neurodegeneration. An international expert group convened in 2021 to discuss the state-of-the-science in this domain. The present article summarizes the presentations and discussions concerning the importance of a strategy for studying sleep- and circadian-related interventions for early detection and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. An international expert group considered the current state of knowledge based on the most relevant publications in the previous 5 years; discussed the current challenges in the field of relationships among sleep, sleep disorders, and neurodegeneration; and identified future priorities. Sleep efficiency and slow wave activity during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep are decreased in cognitively normal middle-aged and older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Sleep deprivation increases amyloid-ß (Aß) concentrations in the interstitial fluid of experimental animal models and in cerebrospinal fluid in humans, while increased sleep decreases Aß. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for dementia. Studies indicate that positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment should be started in patients with mild cognitive impairment or AD and comorbid OSA. Identification of other measures of nocturnal hypoxia and sleep fragmentation could better clarify the role of OSA as a risk factor for neurodegeneration. Concerning REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), it will be crucial to identify the subset of RBD patients who will convert to a specific neurodegenerative disorder. Circadian sleep-wake rhythm disorders (CSWRD) are strong predictors of caregiver stress and institutionalization, but the absence of recommendations or consensus statements must be considered. Future priorities include to develop and validate existing and novel comprehensive assessments of CSWRD in patients with/at risk for dementia. Strategies for studying sleep-circadian-related interventions for early detection/prevention of neurodegenerative diseases are required. CSWRD evaluation may help to identify additional biomarkers for phenotyping and personalizing treatment of neurodegeneration.

Frequency of Orthostatic Hypotension in Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although orthostatic hypotension (OH) can be an early feature of autonomic dysfunction in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), no large-scale studies have examined the frequency of OH in iRBD. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the frequency of OH in a large multicenter iRBD cohort. METHODS: Participants 18 years or older with video polysomnogram-confirmed iRBD were enrolled through the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy consortium. All participants underwent 3-minute orthostatic stand testing to assess the frequency of OH, and a Δ heart rate/Δ systolic blood pressure (ΔHR/ΔSBP) ratio <0.5 was used to define reduced HR augmentation, suggestive of neurogenic OH. All participants completed a battery of assessments, including the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson Disease-Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT) and others assessing cognitive, motor, psychiatric, and sensory domains. RESULTS: Of 340 iRBD participants (65 ± 10 years, 82% male), 93 (27%) met criteria for OH (ΔHR/ΔSBP 0.37 ± 0.28; range 0.0-1.57), and of these, 72 (77%) met criteria for OH with reduced HR augmentation (ΔHR/ΔSBP 0.28 ± 0.21; range 0.0-0.5). Supine hypertension (sHTN) was present in 72% of those with OH. Compared with iRBD participants without OH, those with OH were older, reported older age of RBD symptom onset, and had worse olfaction. There was no difference in autonomic symptom scores as measured by SCOPA-AUT. DISCUSSION: OH and sHTN are common in iRBD. However, as patients may have reduced autonomic symptom awareness, orthostatic stand testing should be considered in clinical evaluations. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the relationship between OH and phenoconversion risk in iRBD. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03623672; North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy Consortium.

Impact of outpatient gastroenterology consult on pharmacotherapy and management of gastrointestinal symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.

Background & aims: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients, and GI dysmotility is thought to induce motor fluctuations, requiring escalation of levodopa therapy. The role of GI consultation in managing such symptoms, however, is unclear. In this study, we investigate the possible association between GI dysmotility symptoms and escalated LEDD therapy, as well as factors associated with GI consultation for PD symptom management. Methods: This was a retrospective case-study of 248 PD patients evaluated by outpatient neurology at Massachusetts General Brigham Healthcare from 2018 to 2022. Logistic regression, t-test, and Fisher exact tests were performed to identify factors associated with GI consult, change in LEDD with consult, and association of consultation with GI diagnoses and treatments, respectively. Results: Among 248 PD patients, 12.9% received GI consultation despite 96.8% having GI symptoms. Bloating was the primary symptom associated with receiving GI consultation (OR 3.59 [95% CI 1.47-8.88], p = 0.005). GI consultation increased the odds of receiving GI-specific medications (78.2% vs 46.3%, p = 0.001) and specialized GI diagnoses like gastroparesis (9.4% vs 0.46%, p < 0.001) and pelvic floor dysfunction (15.6% vs 0%, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, LEDD tended not to change after GI consultation, and dysmotility symptoms, including bloating, did not predict need for higher LEDD. Conclusions: While treating symptoms of dysmotility may not ameliorate levodopa-based motor fluctuations as much as previously thought, GI consultations are underutilized in PD, and patients who receive GI consultation are more likely to have changes in GI diagnosis and treatment.

Safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of SYN120, a dual 5-HT6/5-HT2A antagonist, for the treatment of Parkinson disease dementia: A randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: SYN120 is a dual serotonin receptor (5-HT6/5-HT2A) antagonist hypothesized to improve cognition and psychiatric symptoms. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SYN120 in patients with Parkinson disease dementia (PDD). METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, 16-week phase 2a proof-of-concept trial in PDD with concomitant cholinesterase inhibitor use, eligible patients were randomized to oral SYN120 (100 mg/day) or placebo. Adverse events (AEs), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, and discontinuations assessed safety and tolerability. The primary and key secondary efficacy measures were the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerized assessment system Continuity of Attention and Quality of Episodic Memory scores. Other efficacy measures were: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician's Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC), Brief Penn Parkinson's Daily Activity Questionnaire-15 (PDAQ-15), Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Sleep Scale (SCOPA-Sleep), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were randomized to SYN120 (N = 38) or placebo (N = 44), AEs occurred in 74% and 77% of patients, and treatment discontinuation in both groups was 16%. Nausea and vomiting were more frequent, and motor symptoms (UPDRS) worsened in the SYN120 group. At week 16, the SYN120 and placebo groups did not differ significantly for any cognitive assessment. Cognitive activities of daily living (PDAQ-15) and the NPI-Apathy/Indifference scores improved nominally in the SYN120 group compared with placebo (unadjusted p = 0.029 and 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: SYN120 was adequately tolerated, mild worsening of motor symptoms was noted and it did not improve cognition in PDD patients. Its potential benefits for cognitive activities of daily living and apathy warrant further study. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02258152.

Sleep Disorders and Circadian Disruption in Huntington's Disease.

Sleep and circadian alterations are common in patients with Huntington's disease (HD). Understanding the pathophysiology of these alterations and their association with disease progression and morbidity can guide HD management. We provide a narrative review of the clinical and basic-science studies centered on sleep and circadian function on HD. Sleep/wake disturbances among HD patients share many similarities with other neurodegenerative diseases. Overall, HD patients and animal models of the disease present with sleep changes early in the clinical course of the disease, including difficulties with sleep initiation and maintenance leading to decreased sleep efficiency, and progressive deterioration of normal sleep architecture. Despite this, sleep alterations remain frequently under-reported by patients and under-recognized by health professionals. The degree of sleep and circadian alterations has not consistently shown to be CAG dose-dependent. Evidence based treatment recommendations are insufficient due to lack of well-designed intervention trials. Approaches aimed at improving circadian entrainment, such as including light therapy, and time-restricted feeding have demonstrated a potential to delay symptom progression in some basic HD investigations. Larger study cohorts, comprehensive assessment of sleep and circadian function, and reproducibility of findings are needed in future in order to better understand sleep and circadian function in HD and to develop effective treatments.

Assessment of heterogeneity among participants in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative cohort using α-synuclein seed amplification: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence shows that α-synuclein seed amplification assays (SAAs) have the potential to differentiate people with Parkinson's disease from healthy controls. We used the well characterised, multicentre Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort to further assess the diagnostic performance of the α-synuclein SAA and to examine whether the assay identifies heterogeneity among patients and enables the early identification of at-risk groups. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis is based on assessments done at enrolment for PPMI participants (including people with sporadic Parkinson's disease from LRRK2 and GBA variants, healthy controls, prodromal individuals with either rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) or hyposmia, and non-manifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA variants) from 33 participating academic neurology outpatient practices worldwide (in Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK, and the USA). α-synuclein SAA analysis of CSF was performed using previously described methods. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the α-synuclein SAA in participants with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls, including subgroups based on genetic and clinical features. We established the frequency of positive α-synuclein SAA results in prodromal participants (RBD and hyposmia) and non-manifesting carriers of genetic variants associated with Parkinson's disease, and compared α-synuclein SAA to clinical measures and other biomarkers. We used odds ratio estimates with 95% CIs to measure the association between α-synuclein SAA status and categorical measures, and two-sample 95% CIs from the resampling method to assess differences in medians between α-synuclein SAA positive and negative participants for continuous measures. A linear regression model was used to control for potential confounders such as age and sex. FINDINGS: This analysis included 1123 participants who were enrolled between July 7, 2010, and July 4, 2019. Of these, 545 had Parkinson's disease, 163 were healthy controls, 54 were participants with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit, 51 were prodromal participants, and 310 were non-manifesting carriers. Sensitivity for Parkinson's disease was 87·7% (95% CI 84·9-90·5), and specificity for healthy controls was 96·3% (93·4-99·2). The sensitivity of the α-synuclein SAA in sporadic Parkinson's disease with the typical olfactory deficit was 98·6% (96·4-99·4). The proportion of positive α-synuclein SAA was lower than this figure in subgroups including LRRK2 Parkinson's disease (67·5% [59·2-75·8]) and participants with sporadic Parkinson's disease without olfactory deficit (78·3% [69·8-86·7]). Participants with LRRK2 variant and normal olfaction had an even lower α-synuclein SAA positivity rate (34·7% [21·4-48·0]). Among prodromal and at-risk groups, 44 (86%) of 51 of participants with RBD or hyposmia had positive α-synuclein SAA (16 of 18 with hyposmia, and 28 of 33 with RBD). 25 (8%) of 310 non-manifesting carriers (14 of 159 [9%] LRRK2 and 11 of 151 [7%] GBA) were positive. INTERPRETATION: This study represents the largest analysis so far of the α-synuclein SAA for the biochemical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Our results show that the assay classifies people with Parkinson's disease with high sensitivity and specificity, provides information about molecular heterogeneity, and detects prodromal individuals before diagnosis. These findings suggest a crucial role for the α-synuclein SAA in therapeutic development, both to identify pathologically defined subgroups of people with Parkinson's disease and to establish biomarker-defined at-risk cohorts. FUNDING: PPMI is funded by the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and funding partners, including: Abbvie, AcureX, Aligning Science Across Parkinson's, Amathus Therapeutics, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Bial Biotech, Biohaven, Biogen, BioLegend, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calico Labs, Celgene, Cerevel, Coave, DaCapo Brainscience, 4D Pharma, Denali, Edmond J Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly, GE Healthcare, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Golub Capital, Insitro, Janssen Neuroscience, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Neurocrine Biosciences, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Takeda, Teva, UCB, VanquaBio, Verily, Voyager Therapeutics, and Yumanity.

Progression of clinical markers in prodromal Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies: a multicentre study.

The neurodegenerative synucleinopathies, including Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, are characterized by a typically lengthy prodromal period of progressive subclinical motor and non-motor manifestations. Among these, idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder is a powerful early predictor of eventual phenoconversion, and therefore represents a critical opportunity to intervene with neuroprotective therapy. To inform the design of randomized trials, it is essential to study the natural progression of clinical markers during the prodromal stages of disease in order to establish optimal clinical end points. In this study, we combined prospective follow-up data from 28 centres of the International REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Study Group representing 12 countries. Polysomnogram-confirmed REM sleep behaviour disorder subjects were assessed for prodromal Parkinson's disease using the Movement Disorder Society criteria and underwent periodic structured sleep, motor, cognitive, autonomic and olfactory testing. We used linear mixed-effect modelling to estimate annual rates of clinical marker progression stratified by disease subtype, including prodromal Parkinson's disease and prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies. In addition, we calculated sample size requirements to demonstrate slowing of progression under different anticipated treatment effects. Overall, 1160 subjects were followed over an average of 3.3 ± 2.2 years. Among clinical variables assessed continuously, motor variables tended to progress faster and required the lowest sample sizes, ranging from 151 to 560 per group (at 50% drug efficacy and 2-year follow-up). By contrast, cognitive, olfactory and autonomic variables showed modest progression with higher variability, resulting in high sample sizes. The most efficient design was a time-to-event analysis using combined milestones of motor and cognitive decline, estimating 117 per group at 50% drug efficacy and 2-year trial duration. Finally, while phenoconverters showed overall greater progression than non-converters in motor, olfactory, cognitive and certain autonomic markers, the only robust difference in progression between Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies phenoconverters was in cognitive testing. This large multicentre study demonstrates the evolution of motor and non-motor manifestations in prodromal synucleinopathy. These findings provide optimized clinical end points and sample size estimates to inform future neuroprotective trials.

Enrollment of Participants From Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Comparative Assessment of the STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 Trials.

Background and Objectives: Representation of persons from marginalized racial and ethnic groups in Parkinson disease (PD) trials has been low, limiting the generalizability of therapeutic options for individuals with PD. Two large phase 3 randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3, screened participants from overlapping Parkinson Study Group clinical sites under similar eligibility criteria but differed in participation by underrepresented minorities. The goal of this research is to compare recruitment strategies of PD participants belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic groups. Methods: A total of 998 participants with identified race and ethnicity consented to STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 from 86 clinical sites. Demographics, clinical trial characteristics, and recruitment strategies were compared. NINDS imposed a minority recruitment mandate on STEADY-PD III but not SURE-PD3. Results: Ten percent of participants who consented to STEADY-PD III self-identified as belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic groups compared to 6.5% in SURE-PD3 (difference = 3.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4%-7.5%, p value = 0.034). This difference persisted after screening (10.1% of patients in STEADY-PD III vs 5.4% in SURE-PD 3, difference = 4.7%, 95% CI 0.6%-8.8%, p value = 0.038). Discussion: Although both trials targeted similar participants, STEADY-PD III was able to consent and recruit a higher percentage of patients from racial and ethnic marginalized groups. Possible reasons include differential incentives for achieving minority recruitment goals. Trial Registration Information: This study used data from The Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Assessment of Isradipine for Parkinson Disease (STEADY-PD III; NCT02168842) and the Study of Urate Elevation in Parkinson's Disease (SURE-PD3; NCT02642393).

Study design challenges and strategies in clinical trials for rare diseases: Lessons learned from pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.

Substantial challenges in study design and methodology exist during clinical trial development to examine treatment response in patients with a rare disease, especially those with predominant central nervous system involvement and heterogeneity in clinical manifestations and natural history. Here we discuss crucial decisions which may significantly impact success of the study, including patient selection and recruitment, identification and selection of endpoints, determination of the study duration, consideration of control groups including natural history controls, and selection of appropriate statistical analyses. We review strategies for the successful development of a clinical trial to evaluate treatment of a rare disease with a focus on inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) that present with movement disorders. The strategies presented using pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) as the rare disease example can be applied to other rare diseases, particularly IEMs with movement disorders (e.g., other neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation disorders, lysosomal storage disorders). The significant challenges associated with designing a clinical trial in rare disease can sometimes be successfully met through strategic engagement with experts in the rare disease, seeking regulatory and biostatistical guidance, and early involvement of patients and families. In addition to these strategies, we discuss the urgent need for a paradigm shift within the regulatory processes to help accelerate medical product development and bring new innovations and advances to patients with rare neurodegenerative diseases who need them earlier in disease progression and prior to clinical manifestations.

Baseline characteristics of the North American prodromal Synucleinopathy cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is widely considered a prodromal synucleinopathy, as most with RBD develop overt synucleinopathy within ~10 years. Accordingly, RBD offers an opportunity to test potential treatments at the earliest stages of synucleinopathy. The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium has created a multisite RBD participant, primarily clinic-based cohort to better understand characteristics at diagnosis, and in future work, identify predictors of phenoconversion, develop synucleinopathy biomarkers, and enable early stage clinical trial enrollment. METHODS: Participants ≥18 years of age with overnight polysomnogram-confirmed RBD without Parkinson's disease, dementia, multiple system atrophy, or narcolepsy were enrolled from nine sites across North America (8/2018 to 4/2021). Data collection included family/personal history of RBD and standardized assessments of cognitive, motor, sensory, and autonomic function. RESULTS: Outcomes are primarily reported based on sex (361 total: n = 295 male, n = 66 female), and secondarily based on history of antidepressant use (n = 200 with, n = 154 without; with correction for sex differences) and based on extent of synucleinopathy burden (n = 56 defined as isolated RBD, n = 305 defined as RBD+ [i.e., exhibiting ≥1 abnormality]). Overall, these participants commonly demonstrated abnormalities in global cognition (MoCA; 38%), motor function (alternate tap test; 48%), sensory (BSIT; 57%), autonomic function (orthostatic hypotension, 38.8%), and anxiety/depression (BAI and PHQ-9; 39.3% and 31%, respectively). INTERPRETATION: These RBD participants, assessed with extensive history, demographic, cognitive, motor, sensory, and autonomic function demonstrated a lack of sex differences and high frequency of concomitant neurological abnormalities. These participants will be valuable for future longitudinal study and neuroprotective clinical trials.

Startle-induced rapid release of a gait initiation sequence in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait.

OBJECTIVE: Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by the inability to initiate stepping, despite the intention to do so. This study used a startling acoustic stimulus paradigm to examine if the capacity to select, prepare and initiate gait under simple and choice reaction time conditions are impaired in people with PD and FOG. METHODS: Thirty individuals (10 PD with FOG, 10 PD without FOG, and 10 controls) performed an instructed-delay gait initiation task under simple and choice reaction time conditions. In a subset of trials, a startle stimulus (124 dB) was presented 500 ms before the time of the imperative go-cue. Anticipatory postural adjustments preceding and accompanying gait initiation were quantified. RESULTS: The presentation of a startling acoustic stimulus resulted in the rapid initiation of an anticipatory postural adjustment sequence during both the simple and choice reaction time tasks in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The neural capacity to prepare the spatial and temporal components of gait initiation remains intact in PD individuals with and without FOG. SIGNIFICANCE: The retained capacity to prepare anticipatory postural adjustments in advance may explain why external sensory cues are effective in the facilitation of gait initiation in people with PD with FOG.

Ethical Aspects of Prodromal Synucleinopathy Prognostic Counseling.

Alpha-synucleinopathies can be identified in their prodromal phase, raising several ethical issues. In this review, we first provide definitions of prodromal α-synucleinopathies and discuss the importance of distinguishing between prodromes and risk factors. Next, we discuss the implications of a diagnosis of prodromal α-synucleinopathy and considerations regarding prognostic counseling in both clinical and research settings. We review available data on patient preferences regarding disclosure as well as providers' perspectives. We examine the pros and cons of disclosing a diagnosis of prodromal α-synucleinopathy, taking into consideration the differences between clinical and research settings. Asking about willingness to know in clinical and research settings and the shared decision-making process applied to prognostic counseling is discussed. Concerning research settings, ethical aspects regarding clinical trials are addressed. Availability of direct-to-consumer technologies will likely lead to novel contexts requiring prognostic counseling, and future neuroprotective or neuromodulating treatments may require further considerations on the timing, role, and importance of prognostic counseling. Recommendations on how to address ethical gaps should be a priority for patients, medical professional societies, and research workgroups. Ethical issues must be considered as an integral part of the overall clinical and research approach to prodromal synucleinopathies.

Chronotype, sleep, and sleepiness in Parkinson's disease.

We aimed to determine the distribution of chronotypes in a cohort of PD patients and to evaluate the relationships between chronotype and PD characteristics, and self-reported metrics of sleep and sleepiness. Chronotype was characterized using the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). PD participants were categorized as Evening Types (ET), Neither Types (NT), or Morning Types (MT). Sleepiness was assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep metrics included self-reported sleep times and latency. 186 participants with PD, age 65.5 ± 9.8 yrs, disease duration 6.17 ± 6.7 yrs completed the MEQ. Most participants were classified as MT (63.4%). Participants in the ET group were younger than those in the NT and MT groups (57.6 ± 6.3 vs 67.3 ± 10.2 vs 64.9 ± 9.5). The mean disease duration was not different among chronotypes. No significant relationship between chronotype and sleepiness was found. MT participants woke up and went to bed significantly earlier than NT participants. There was no significant difference between chronotypes and PD medications. Further studies should examine if PD severity and progression affect the chronotype, and whether certain chronotype differentially affects the quality of life, symptom control, and medication effectiveness in the PD population.